Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

More specifically:

http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/licensing/gettin...conditions.html

Prohibited vehicles

The prohibited vehicle condition restricts provisional (P1 and P2) drivers from driving certain high performance vehicles. The condition applies to provisional licences issued on or after 11 July 2005

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3496192
Share on other sites

Yes before the Prohibited vehicles Law came out (11 July 2005) P1 AND P2's where allowed to drive Turbo cars. There was no markings of any restrictions on their license.

But the date is clear 11 July 2005. If you received your license before that date then you can drive turbo cars (ie. L's before 11 July 2005)

So you are asking if if can drive Turbo cars or not? See above.. comment.

Have a read of some other similar threads.

Such as:

P Plate Turbo Restrictions

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3496207
Share on other sites

im a greey p and im allowed to drive turbo only cuz i got my red p's before the new law kicked in...

i double checked with RTA before purchasing the car and i was fine with it....i got my red p's prob at the end of 2005 or something?

BTW: on the license it should say condition "Y" if ur on turbo ban.

Edited by R33Turbo
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3496221
Share on other sites

if you are driving a turbo car on a licence that was issued after the new laws came in then you need to show that you are exempt. they give you a paper that you MUST have in the car at all times to show that you are exempt, so it doesn't mean a damn thing if your licence doesn't have any of the markings that it should.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3496557
Share on other sites

You might get away with it. You might not.

If you come across a cop that does all the checks then expected to get reamed for more than just driving a turbo.

mmm not worth the risk, If you get caught they can probably slaughter you for altering your licence or something.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3498301
Share on other sites

if u got ur reds before the turbo ban then u can drive turbo assuming u havent been suspended or lost ur licence

i got my reds 2 days before the turbo ban and then got my green P's........then i got RBT'ed and the cop looked on his computer and didnt say anything about the turbo thing

so im pertty sure when u get ur greens u can still drive turbo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3498905
Share on other sites

yeah

im on my reds atm drivin gts4..

getting greens soon. so yeahh wat you said it only shows on the card, but when they check the computers i dont think it shows weather you can drive turbo or not..

im not 100% sure.. gota wait 2 years for full liences which is a bitch.! =(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3498933
Share on other sites

so im pertty sure when u get ur greens u can still drive turbo

Correct.

To quote myself:

Provisional licenses (Ps) are a min of 3 years.

According to the below...If you received your "Ps" before 11 July 2005 then you do not have any restrictions in regards to cars

If you received your P1 (Red Ps) before 11 July 2005 and then got your P2 (Green Ps) after 11 July 2005 you still do not have any restrictions in regards to cars.

If however you had your L's before 11 July 2005 then got you got your P1's after 11 July 2005 then you are restricted to certain vehicles.

Well that's my logical deduction.

http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/licensing/gettin...ons.html?llid=4

The prohibited vehicle condition restricts provisional (P1 and P2) drivers from driving certain high performance vehicles. The condition applies to provisional licences issued on or after 11 July 2005. The scheme aims to prohibit young driver access to vehicles that are overrepresented in young driver crashes.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3498949
Share on other sites

If you come across a cop that does all the checks then expected to get reamed for more than just driving a turbo.

If you hit someone while driving a car you're not licensed to drive, expect to get reamed even harder in multiple ways when you have to pay that victim's medical expenses out of own pocket because you're not covered by CTP.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3499115
Share on other sites

scathing - If you hit someone while driving a car you're not licensed to drive, expect to get reamed even harder in multiple ways when you have to pay that victim's medical expenses out of own pocket because you're not covered by CTP.

yeh thats what i was thinking, since you be driving a car your not licenced to drive then they'd prob do you for uninsured and all that shit even if they did pull you over, and yes cops can check up on you on their computer in the car, thats why they get your licence and go back to their car for a bit, check your record etc

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3500020
Share on other sites

im not sure about this but they'd probably do you for driving unlicenced or sum sh*t cause you wouldnt have a licence to drive a turbo car, its just not worth it imo

Just $400 for driving a prohibited vehicle and another $600 for altering a licence...............

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3502541
Share on other sites

I have my green p's and can drive turbo's but i had my red's before the laws came in...

I was thinking that as soon as these new laws came in I would be hassled a hell of a lot more by the cops cause of me driving a skyline with p's...but quiet the opposite... I have probably been pulled over 2 in the 12 months... none of which questiond me about the restriction... prior to the new laws i swear i used to get pulled over every weekend just for rbt n to check the car...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195145-quick-question/#findComment-3502644
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...