Jump to content
SAU Community

Oils - Engine, Gearbox, Which Ones And Where To Get?


Recommended Posts

Hi SLED , thought I would just say that if your car was a new import, they would of had to put new oil in the car for compliance reasons .

The question is what type of oil . If the car was complied by a reputable workshop , they should of put in a good quality oil anyway.

But even then , I must admit , that I changed every oil in my car in the first month .

Mark Tilbrook recomended me to do this ,and I did ,so I wouldn't get any nasty surprises.

Just my 2c for you . Michael

Yeah I thoroughly agree Mike....I can't wait to dump all the oils and coolant and start fresh.

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've got Redline in my gearbox and when cold the second gear syncro can make a bit of a noise... uh ohh

Well you know what Bunny33 said on the previous page.......she may have a point there Hillzy.

i personaly know 2 ppl that their gear boxes have blown from using redline it damages the syincros (spelling) and mechanics i know only use redline in jap gear boxes when they need to shut them up if their is a little bit of a noise
Sorry pkblade but nearly everything you've stated here has been proven incorrect.

Synthetic oil used to be known for the couple of extra horsepower it could give you on the dyno but at the expense of your engines internals....it will not protect against piston skirt and bore scuffing and generally leaves your plugs too wet not to mention poor oil pressure and excessive oil consumption.

ULX-110 will always have better cling factor than Synthetic which is what we mainly need....an easy test is to half fill 2 glasses with each oil and stir then see which one clings on the side of the glass the longest......Synthetic oils have always been known to be bad for cold starts anyway.

As far as change between intervals, Mack Trucks in the USA have approved ULX-110 for 40,000 miles before change.

RB engines already have enough issues with their oil galleries and passages being too large so why would exaggerate the problem by using synthetics?

Well to begin with since I'm incorrect you might, as well as, inform all those who make & engineer these synthetic oils that they're incompetent in what they're doing :).

I didn’t say it’s cos of the oil that Top Fuelers regularly inspect the engine. Also, don’t know why you’re using Top Fuel dragsters as an example, they use thicker custom blends to suit their engine & application & same goes for diesel trucks as, implied by 'mid life crisis' - apples & oranges. The engines in our jap imports have much smaller clearances than most Aussie or American built pushrods so, a healthy RB engine using a suitable full synthetic is perfectly fine. Unless your engine is showing signs of wear your claim of excessive oil consumption with all synthetics is just codswallop.

Also, the problems you’ve mentioned aren’t really an issue for our dailys unless you start dramatically increasing the power &/or regularly go to the drags/ track or just like to hit the rev limiter for fun. In which case, I highly doubt the type of oil you use will miraculously solve the oil flow problems associated with our RB engines when racing. There are other more sure & direct measures to aid this problem (eg. larger sump, adding external return hose, modifying oil feeds & return galleries etc).

The test regarding oil clinging to glass don’t mean jack, many full synthetics have been engineered to bond with metal surfaces. Is your engine made of glass??

Also, there are synthetics that have extra additives as well that do similar things Ultra-Lube claims their product can do. I don’t have anything against ULX-110, nor semi-synthetics which I’ve used them in the past (namely Fuchs “Australia’s fastest oil” *awaits for cheque in mail* :)) but, was religious in changing it every 5000kms. However, I am sceptical when companies make larg Hp gain claims & it being superior to all synthetics whether full or semi when some of them also consist of similar additive make-ups.

Also, care to expand on the statement that all suitable synthetics are notoriously bad for cold starts & especially how so for turbo engines?

Well to begin with since I'm incorrect you might, as well as, inform all those who make & engineer these synthetic oils that they're incompetent in what they're doing. :whistling:

I didn’t say it’s cos of the oil that Top Fuelers regularly inspect the engine. Also, don’t know why you’re using Top Fuel dragsters as an example, they use thicker custom blends to suit their engine & application & same goes for diesel trucks as, implied by 'mid life crisis' - apples & oranges. The engines in our jap imports have much smaller clearances than most Aussie or American built pushrods so, a healthy RB engine using a suitable full synthetic is perfectly fine. Unless your engine is showing signs of wear your claim of excessive oil consumption with all synthetics is just codswallop.

Also, the problems you’ve mentioned aren’t really an issue for our dailys unless you start dramatically increasing the power &/or do regular drag/ track work or just like to hit the rev limiter reguarly for fun. In which case, I highly doubt the type of oil you use will miraculously solve the oil flow problems associated with our RB engines when racing. There are other more sure & direct measures to aid this problem (eg. larger sump, adding external return hose, modifying oil feeds & return galleries etc).

The test regarding oil clinging to glass don’t mean jack, many full synthetics have been engineered to bond with metal surfaces. Is your engine made of glass??

Also, there are synthetics that have extra additives as well that do similar things Ultra-Lube claims their product can do. I don’t have anything against ULX-110, nor semi-synthetics which I’ve used them in the past (namely Fuchs “Australia’s fastest oil” *awaits for cheque in mail* :) ) but, was religious in changing it every 5000kms. However, I am sceptical when companies make larg Hp gain claims & it being superior to all synthetics whether full or semi when some of them also consist of similar additive make-ups.

Also, care to expand on the statement that all suitable synthetics are notoriously bad for cold starts & especially how so for turbo engines?

Gee.....I must have hit a bit of a nerve there pkblade. I didn't mean to offend you in anyway and I'm sure your a nice guy but honestly, have another read of your recent post.....you like the word 'codswallop', I think 'dribble' might be more appropriate.

You seem to make alot of rash statements without qualifying anything so I assume it's based on your personal experience. I've based everything on documented evidence by people who have spent millions in testing and as far as testing fluids on chalk rather than cheese, GMH and every other large car manufacturer have been doing this on the race track for years before attempting anything in a passenger car. It stands to reason that subjecting oil to the extremes of a Mack truck and top fueler or a Formula 1 is the best test possible.....how do recommend these billion dollar international companies should conduct their testing then?

I'm not sure what your backgound is or what experience you've had but since you asked, at Adelaide Engine Service we used to do alot of the testing of friction modified oils vs the likes of Redex, Repco's non-friction modified (many years ago, probably before you were born) because of the excessive oil consumption in brand new Jap cars especially 4cyl Datsuns. We put out a white paper to the MTAA about our findings and it wasn't long after that Repco, Southcotts and the RAA began to warn about the dangers of some oils and there effects in new bores. Over recent years it hasn't been as crucial due to the different methods, materials and honing of bores (ie cross hatching at various angles and grades etc).

By the way, if you don't like experimenting with your kitchen glasses, try baked bean cans.......same results.

I probably shouldn't have responded to this post either, but ahhhh how much more can a koala bear?! :)

This is quoted directly from their website...

"Redline Lightweight ShockProof®

A unique gear oil designed to lubricate racing transmissions and transaxles which see serious loads (not recommended for most syncro-type transmissions). It has excellent low-temperature flow which allows easier shifting when cold. May be used to obtain maximum power transfer in racing differentials which do not see high temperatures. Similar to a 75W140 gear oil, but with the lower internal friction of an SAE 30 motor oil.

Used in most road-racing differentials with moderate power and dogring racing transaxles."

I have herd the exact same things about syncro wear, hence why i do not use it in my car. IMO Castrol brands are the cheapest and the best form of lubrication for diffs and gearbox's but each to his own.

Hey Dave....I didn't realy pay attention to your post before but it sounds like good info....thanks for the heads up.

stock filters can be cought from any automotive shop eg autobarn get ryco as they have an anti drain back valve and have a better filtration system as the webbing inside is 4 times as long as wesfil so better filtering and the r33 on is under $10 i think aslo the nissan ones are made by ryco just stamped nissan as is holden ford and mitsu but they dont tell you that as they want you to think that if your getting a manufactures filter the service is better but this is not the case and yes i do know this for a fact as all those training nights at autobarn werent all for nothing

also royal purple is once again for high reving engines as in being on the track if you dont belive me theo gt autosound also a friend of mine and he uses it in his drag s15 i promiss you dont need that sort of oil for every day driving and a few hills runs now in saying all this if you want to spend money cause it makes you happy or what ever then buy the motul 300v now the most intence race ever would have to lemoun (spelling sorry) the 24hr car race anyway and guess what they use.....yes motul,

now working at autobarn you really need do need to know what your talking about when it comes to oil and performance and ppl that know me know i know what im on about most of the time but if you give someone the wrong oil, verscosety, weight and brand then i could cause them to be sued i also recomend what i use and that goes for workshops and so on so if anyone on sau is using redline pleeeas change it straight away cause i do love you all so and um yeah thats all

stock filters can be cought from any automotive shop eg autobarn get ryco as they have an anti drain back valve and have a better filtration system

Yeah thanks for the good info Bunny. :P I went through a similar exercise when I was building the bike earlier this, wondering whether to use a filter with or without an anti drain back valve. In the case of certain V-Twins though, it depended on whether I was using a scavenging oil pump or not....I eventually worked it out. Wrong filter in an S&S motor could kiss away 1650cc of crated motor. :)

sure I have read in another oil post that ryco are substandard compared with nissan and some of the other aftermarket ones

try this thread for more info

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/go...=oil&st=640

its a long thread but interesting and relevant to the discussion here

I try to avoid them for both the Jeep and the 'Line just hear to many bad things over the years about em

from to many people

Yeah thanks for the good info Bunny. :P I went through a similar exercise when I was building the bike earlier this, wondering whether to use a filter with or without an anti drain back valve. In the case of certain V-Twins though, it depended on whether I was using a scavenging oil pump or not....I eventually worked it out. Wrong filter in an S&S motor could kiss away 1650cc of crated motor. :bunny:

thats right :)

sure I have read in another oil post that ryco are substandard compared with nissan and some of the other aftermarket ones

try this thread for more info

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/go...=oil&st=640

its a long thread but interesting and relevant to the discussion here

I try to avoid them for both the Jeep and the 'Line just hear to many bad things over the years about em

from to many people

well i use ryco on my car and all my mates that have imports use them as well and i use ryco fuel filter but i use a 210 because its slightly bigger

  • 4 weeks later...

well i just bought 5l of Nulon High Tech Fast Flowing 10w-40 from Holden Hill auto barn with there Nulon E20 oil additive

i was actually served by Flicks old CSA friend (blue turbo laser and Rx7) she says hello flick :)

i asked for a good price and she did great on the price :D i got $8 discount on my oil and filter combo

get motul everything.. autobarn stocks it and if u go to the autobarn on sir donald bradman drive the guy there is a rep for motul and is very helpful.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...