Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im not saying im super supreme (pun?) in anyway but i used to smash alot of stock r32 GTRs on a rollby but would get wasted off the line. but i would start catching up easily, but not enough to call it a victory. normally when i see a GTR i dont bother running off the line. maybe after i beat them real bad on the roll.

this was wen my car was at 250rwkw. so i cant wait to get my gt35 3.0L on the road =]

P.S i would like to explain again i dont think myself as uBur l33t. but just to give u an idea. wat do 32 gtrs output stock?

Edited by R34NRG
im not saying im super supreme (pun?) in anyway but i used to smash alot of stock r32 GTRs on a rollby but would get wasted off the line. but i would start catching up easily, but not enough to call it a victory. normally when i see a GTR i dont bother running off the line. maybe after i beat them real bad on the roll.

this was wen my car was at 250rwkw. so i cant wait to get my gt35 3.0L on the road =]

P.S i would like to explain again i dont think myself as uBur l33t. but just to give u an idea. wat do 32 gtrs output stock?

which drag strip in Melbourne does roll on starts?

which drag strip in Melbourne does roll on starts?

I have certainly never heard of one, which begs the question, how and where is the 'slowest skyline driver' on the road smashing all these R32 GTR's on 'roll by'?

Ive got to be one of the slowest skyline drivers there are. i never ever speed and havnt even done my 1st burnout hahahah (tyres expensive :) )

2nd gear pulls alot harder in rwd mode than awd in my r32 gtr. Feels like an extra 2psi. Cheers!

oh yeah its only noticable in 1st and 2nd gear.. when boosting in 3rd gear it obviously doesn't put much to the front wheels while in awd.. there for making very very little diff.

Edited by gtrboosting

Mine was tested at AutoSalon in 2005.

604awkw on the Sat and 608rwkw on the Sun. Same dyno, just dropped the front shaft and that was it.

not quite, but that difference isnt anything to get major excited about.

It will be less, but not substantially at all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...