Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

this is not a RB26. it is a BMW inline six 3.9L

Cannot decide between Gt55 and Gt60.

I know there are many big-boys here and your comments are appreciated.

Use of this car is Highway rolls & drag racing as well.

With the 3.9L displacement which turbo would you use?

Compression ratio. 9,0 to 10.5:1 (C16 all time use, as this is not a daily cruiser. I have a E46 M3 with twin GT3076s for daily use)

Arrow Precision Forged Titanium rods or Forged rods? How will Tit rods behave?

Pistons: which brand would you opt? CP/ Arias?

Main billet caps will be custom produced. There is no billet main cap for this engine.

Cylinder head: I am leaning towards Headgames. Any other reputable head builder?

Cams: Custom cams will be grind as per HKS 280 cam specs used on 2JZE. This is tough, need custom grinding.

Exhaust manifold: not as perfect as a Full-Race. But I will do my best in fabrication, smooth curves, trying to keep the runners close to equal.

Maximum engine speed will be 8800-9000 rpm

Which turbocharger would you choose? GT55 or GT60?

I personally dynoed a Supra with GT45-80 on my own Dyno Dynamics and saw full boost at around 5000 rpm on 3.0L. head was perfectly prepared with agressive Port & Polish and + 2 mm valves.

I have talked to another supra owner, and his full spool is around 6k rpm. With 500 cc extra engine capacity, a GT 55 would spool at around 5300-5500 rpm (assuming the compression ratio is 10,0 and cylinder head is very well prepared)

GT55 power band will be from 5500 to 8800 rpm. Acceptable and will put a smile on the face.

On the other side, GT60 is an unknown application. Cannot get first-hand information about GT60. I only saw this video

At which rpm will the Gt60 spool on this application with 3.9L engine? I fear of having full spool at around 6600-7000 rpm on the 3.9L with the GT60.

Which turbocharger would you choose for this application?

MD __________________

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/
Share on other sites

It Wouldnt Be School Holidays Would It?

And What Beemer Has a 3.9 In it?

M3's are 3.2

M3 has 3200 cc

M88 engine has 3.5 to 3.8L capacity. add to that a stroker kit, we end up 3.9L

Apart from the 3.9L project, below is my Twin Gt3076 E46 M3. photo is low resolution...

TWIN%20GT30R.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3551911
Share on other sites

very nice work and i stand corrected

thank you very much. RB family has been helpful and also was a source of inspiration.

i will test different A/R s on the exhaust side, different cams and try to find the best combo on my Dynamics. BTW you Aussie people have a wonderful Dyno, and i am also a lucky owner of dynamics dyno as well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552079
Share on other sites

Nice.

The Reason I Sounded Dubious At first is there are a lot of school students who claim to own all these rediculous cars.

I see the car is LHD so your in the US im Guessing.

Pistons I Personally would go Cosworth Custom Same with Con-Rods as by the looks of it There is no budget on this thing you are building.

Make sure you line bore the Billet mains with them torqued into place because of the difference in materials used (cast iron block - Steel Mains)

As For the Turbo I cant comment Because GT55 and GT60 Mean Nothing with out details like Trim, Comp and Exh A/R Etc Etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552087
Share on other sites

Hi Mr twin turbo M3, if the twin GT30R is really yours the I am pretty sure we've communicated albeit under slightly different names.

As For the Turbo I cant comment Because GT55 and GT60 Mean Nothing with out details like Trim, Comp and Exh A/R Etc Etc.

There is only one trim comp/turbine setting for the GT55 and GT60 turbos out there - they have an awesomely wide map and aren't likely to build boost quick enough to surge on a 3.9litre anyway. It'd make sense to go one of the smallest turbine a/rs on a BMW.

You mention rev range etc - what boost level/power level are you actually after? GT5591 is a HUGE turbo, I'd not even consider a GT60 and barely think about a GT55. The GT60 you showed, and the only other GT60 I've seen used were both on 26Bs which would provide a shiteload more exhaust gas than a 3.9l BMW though I guess you have to consider compressor efficiency, spinning a 3.9 to near 9000rpm will probably require a decent one though again what are you needs? Are you sure you need to rev that high to meet them?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552170
Share on other sites

I think you need to have a look at this thread

http://www.performanceforums.com/forums/sh....php?t=67218679

He had a gt60 and its just too big, he now has a precision turbo good for 2000 hp and is a shit load lighter then the garrett turbo.

Check it out.

alsads20066m47mb4.jpg

Edited by GTR1993
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552328
Share on other sites

no way i'd go for any of those turbos, you'll make some nice power but only for about 500rpm right before redline, that motor is just too small IMO

bigger turbo doesnt mean you'll g faster, look at something like a GT45 at the most, and you'll have power through the rev range, not just on top of it. with too big of a turbo, you just wont spend any time making power. put it on the quater and you'd struggle to run a 13

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552360
Share on other sites

Nice.

The Reason I Sounded Dubious At first is there are a lot of school students who claim to own all these rediculous cars.

I see the car is LHD so your in the US im Guessing.

Pistons I Personally would go Cosworth Custom Same with Con-Rods as by the looks of it There is no budget on this thing you are building.

Make sure you line bore the Billet mains with them torqued into place because of the difference in materials used (cast iron block - Steel Mains)

As For the Turbo I cant comment Because GT55 and GT60 Mean Nothing with out details like Trim, Comp and Exh A/R Etc Etc.

Yes left hand drive. I am from the sphincter of the universe, not from US.

Budget is the last restriction, in these projects, if one tends to follow the economy root, results are disaster.

May I ask what you mean by LINE BORE BILLET? is this torque honing with the plate?

I am not a professional, do it as a hobby, and got a dynamics twin retarder dyno. www.da-motorsport.com is my page, not professional, but as a hobby.

GT55 with 91 mm comp wheel and 1.0 A/R spools at 6000-6300 rpm on a 3.4L supra with lots of head modification, with full race exhaust manifold.

So, on a 3.9L, full spool should be around 5300 - 5500 rpm. Assuming all variables are well matched and done.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552730
Share on other sites

What i mean is you need to bolt the mains caps down and hone them so they match. they also have different thermal expansion rates between the two different types of material (iron and steel) So from memory it needs to be done at normal operating temps of the block but dont quote me.

Speak to a high end engine builder who has expirence with billet steel mains on a cast iron block (you may have to ring the USA to get your answers)

A question though......why would you want power coming on at 6000rpm? that would just piss me off

nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, wheel spin, rev limiter, change gear, then do it all over again

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552750
Share on other sites

Hi Mr twin turbo M3, if the twin GT30R is really yours the I am pretty sure we've communicated albeit under slightly different names.

There is only one trim comp/turbine setting for the GT55 and GT60 turbos out there - they have an awesomely wide map and aren't likely to build boost quick enough to surge on a 3.9litre anyway. It'd make sense to go one of the smallest turbine a/rs on a BMW.

You mention rev range etc - what boost level/power level are you actually after? GT5591 is a HUGE turbo, I'd not even consider a GT60 and barely think about a GT55. The GT60 you showed, and the only other GT60 I've seen used were both on 26Bs which would provide a shiteload more exhaust gas than a 3.9l BMW though I guess you have to consider compressor efficiency, spinning a 3.9 to near 9000rpm will probably require a decent one though again what are you needs? Are you sure you need to rev that high to meet them?

Power is as much as the block will handle:) Stroke of 3.9L is 91 mm so we have safe piston speeds @ 9000 rpm. As a result, i will be safely revving 9ooo rpm. There will be more safety precautions such as sleeving the block and use of L19 studs.

Power should be as much as possible, fuel will be C16 all time as we wont use this car. I do not mention power, as our Dyno Dynamics reads lower less than US dynos. But the base power will be 300- 320 whp, in naturally aspirated trim. Goal is high compression ratio, serious port and polish.

Having a strong base power and boosting 30 to 45 psi will end up with nice figures, Assuming all go well and engine stays one piece.

One important point is: different cams and different A/Rs will be tested and the best combination will be found. It is a hobby so i will take it easy and go step by step.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552794
Share on other sites

What i mean is you need to bolt the mains caps down and hone them so they match. they also have different thermal expansion rates between the two different types of material (iron and steel) So from memory it needs to be done at normal operating temps of the block but dont quote me.

Speak to a high end engine builder who has expirence with billet steel mains on a cast iron block (you may have to ring the USA to get your answers)

A question though......why would you want power coming on at 6000rpm? that would just piss me off

nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, wheel spin, rev limiter, change gear, then do it all over again

Zebra.

Thank you for your interest.

I own a M3, which you saw above, equipped with twin GT3076s. This M3, may have full boost @ 5000 rpm. And rev 9000 rpm. (stock limiter is set @ 8ooo rpm) .

On the M3 i have a drivable and acceptable power band.

Other than the M3, i also have a 2,8L BMW inline with twin GT2871s. This 2.8L is making full boost at 4700 rpm and revving 8ooo rpm. Still acceptable.

When i was building the M3 3.2L with twin GT3076s and my 2,8L with twin GT2871, i was reading this forum and also gtr.co.uk and was trying to find out how Gt3037s of HKS responded on RB26 and RB30s.

Thanks to members of these 2 forums, I have great feedback.

SO far i did test the 2.8L twin Gt2871 on the road, was spooling @ 4700 rpm, A/Rs 0,64 on the hot side.

When the M3 twin GT3076 will be done i will post dyno dynamics graphs here as well.

Why did i tell you this story?

M3 twin GT3076 and 2.8L twin Gt2871 are drivable on road. 100 octane pump fuel of Shell is used. So still daily.

On the other side, the new project with 3.9L and GT??? will be used just for:

RACING BIG BOYS. There are some 900 whp supras in the sphincter of the universe, one of them made 830 whp on my dynamics. And there are some 7.0L corvettes with 350-500 hp nitroussss.

So with the 3.9L, just pure racing goal, C16 used all time, exhaust discharged straight to the pavement, no silencer, no interior, JUSTA BOMB to test with big boys on highway rolls.

For highway rolls between 100 km/h to 280 km/h this latest project will respond and compete with big boys.

What do you say?

mert

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552814
Share on other sites

What do you say?

Errr, any tires you could use on a street aren't likely to hold the power a maxed out GT5591R or bigger would make :S I'd probably stick to putting something like that on a tube framed drag car with huge slicks.

Here is a GTR running 4 full slicks black tracking down the dragstrip - running a lowly GT4508R:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199147-gt55-or-gt60/#findComment-3552874
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...