Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

Installed my Apexi PFC into my HCR32 yesterday, its an AP Engineering one suited to RB20.

Did the standard self learning procedure, 10 minutes normal idle, 10 minutes with the A/C on and 10 minutes with the demister on.

Everything went fine; car started up and idled fine etc

When I drove the car is drove all smooth and stuff and everything was fine, but I noticed when I gave it a bit of throttle the engine check light (I think it is?) began to flash.

I checked the H/C and the knock readings were at 105 and injector duty at 93.x % @ roughly 6,xxx RPM?

All I have done to the car is;

Blitz return flow intercooler

3" turbo back exhaust (but running standard cat)

BOSCH 040 in-tank pump

Boost creeps up to 12-13psi

Standard air box

Running on BP Ultimate

Is any reason why the knock readings and injduty would go up so high?

I am just slightly confused as I thought the PFC would run a standard map so I don't know what's going wrong, unless it's because of the extra 2-3psi or boost?

In higher gears such as 4th and 5th when cruising at about 100km/h, if I put my foot down sometimes it holds fine, other times the light on the cluster would flash then we'd check the H/C and knock would be under 100, but injduty would be like 90%+

dials01.jpg

Why would the check light start flashing?

The light I have circled in blue is the one that starts flashing, its pretty quick and I back off straight away when it flashes so not sure on the duration of the flash. Is that the engine check light?

Also sometimes when I come to a stop the idle is quiet high, about 1,100rpm which slightly varies between 1,000 - 1,500 RPM as appose to the usually 800rpm.

What does knock mean/doing, and whats a safe level?

Any reason injduty is so high?

Any thoughts?

Edited by abu
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199295-installed-pfc-few-questions/
Share on other sites

hi abu

this is all covered in the powerfc faq - have a read and youll find all the answers

when you got the unit did you perform an ETC, DATA INIT or did you just do the self idle learn procedure?

the engine check light (as covered by the faq) comes on when knocking goes past 60 or when inj duty goes past 98%

hi abu

this is all covered in the powerfc faq - have a read and youll find all the answers

when you got the unit did you perform an ETC, DATA INIT or did you just do the self idle learn procedure?

the engine check light (as covered by the faq) comes on when knocking goes past 60 or when inj duty goes past 98%

Hey Paul

Been waiting for you to come on so I could ask you about this!

Yeah did the ETC, DATA INIT and YES. Did the full self-learning procedure, and did a sensor check.

All the sensors and everything are working, and checked all the values such as tmng, injduty, watertmp etc on idle and it was all as you indicated in your write up, so ordinary out of the normal there.

Oh I see, I thought maybe it would come on closer to 100, so a safe level is 60 knock and under?

Edited by abu

SETTING, INJECTOR

what do you see in here?

yeah a knock of 60 is pretty high and could be causing damage - hence why the engine light comes on

stop flogging the car and loading it up until you get it sorted

SETTING, INJECTOR

what do you see in here?

yeah a knock of 60 is pretty high and could be causing damage - hence why the engine light comes on

stop flogging the car and loading it up until you get it sorted

Will do man, thanks.

Haven't checked injectors but I checked the AFM and it was set to R32 NORMAL.

I will check the injector settings tonight when I get home. What if its set correctly, what else could be the issue?

I am just waiting to get a 3" cat in so I can get it on the dyno for a tune.

What would be causing the idle variance?

Edited by abu

just make sure the injectors are all on %100 and nothing else is changed

it sounds fine hitting 95% at 6k isnt a big deal, as long as it doesnt do it at 4000rpm it should be fine

and it will be on stock maps so it will be considerably richer than it will once its fully tuned - the afr's (could) well dip into the 9's at 6000rpm which is stupid

this will just drive up the duty and waste fuel etc - under normal conditions it will be around 12 so duty would be considerably less if this is the case

plonk it on a dyno and see what comes out - in the mean time if you insist on driving it and trashing it learn how to use the ign correct feature under SETTING, INJ/IGN ADJ and back out a few deg of timing to clear away the knocking issue you are seeing

just make sure the injectors are all on %100 and nothing else is changed

it sounds fine hitting 95% at 6k isnt a big deal, as long as it doesnt do it at 4000rpm it should be fine

and it will be on stock maps so it will be considerably richer than it will once its fully tuned - the afr's (could) well dip into the 9's at 6000rpm which is stupid

this will just drive up the duty and waste fuel etc - under normal conditions it will be around 12 so duty would be considerably less if this is the case

plonk it on a dyno and see what comes out - in the mean time if you insist on driving it and trashing it learn how to use the ign correct feature under SETTING, INJ/IGN ADJ and back out a few deg of timing to clear away the knocking issue you are seeing

Thanks Paul, makes sense now.

Don't drive the car a great deal anyway, short runs here and there thats about it.

Will try and get it onto a dyno within the next few days and hopefully get it all sorted, but for now I will have a little play around with the igntmng and see how that goes.

Hey, the tmng was hitting like 42deg @6,xxx RPM. Does that sound about right or a bit to high?

On idle it was on the normal 15 - 20deg.

42deg at 6 grand doesnt sound right

are you sure your reading it correctly and not just looking at the max value?

when you press UP it just shows you the max value for any given time - not at the current point in time

42deg ign timing would have been around 3000rpm ish or a bit lower - which is normal

15deg ing timing at idle is normal - also before you get a full time - make sure the mechanic does base idle ign timing check & set with a timing light

42deg ign timing at 6k on load will destroy the engine - which is why it sounds like your reading it wrong

most gtst's run around 20deg ign timing up near 6k RPM

42deg at 6 grand doesnt sound right

are you sure your reading it correctly and not just looking at the max value?

when you press UP it just shows you the max value for any given time - not at the current point in time

42deg ign timing would have been around 3000rpm ish or a bit lower - which is normal

15deg ing timing at idle is normal - also before you get a full time - make sure the mechanic does base idle ign timing check & set with a timing light

42deg ign timing at 6k on load will destroy the engine - which is why it sounds like your reading it wrong

most gtst's run around 20deg ign timing up near 6k RPM

I'm pretty sure I read it right.

What we did was, I would give it throttle in say 3rd, engine check light would come on then I'd back of and press up.

Ah wait I seee.. it just gives you the highest reading for each value right, so highest for igntmng, injduty, RPM, but that doesn't mean the igntmng, injduty and RPM are all read at the same time.

eg: @ 6,000RPM it was at 40deg igntmng and 95% injduty?

Its more like the highest RPM read was, the highest injduty was, and the highest igntmng was.

Yep I miss interpreted the information given.

Edited by abu

my car on the datalogit was showing engine light on dash with quarter throttle @3000rpm 3rd gear on the road. for that section of the map it was set to less then 23 which at the time of the light ad a knock reading of over 70.... basicaly std engine, wonder wtf it could be..

Well pulled the PFC out this afternoon as I couldn't get it to stop knocking, so stock ECU went back in.

Just wondering if the car knocks with the PFC, will it knock on the stock ECU, or is it safe to drive with the stock ECU?

cram it in there with the harness like it does naturaly, then used gods greatest creation... the cable tie!

Hahah thanks man.

I had the kick panel over it and it held fine, sitting in the stock position but.

I just want to secure it to make sure it doesn't rattle and get wrecked.

velcro is your friend

Ah good idea.

I want to use velcro for the hand commander but I don't know where to position it yet!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...