Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi i was just wondering wat program people have that they use 2 remap power fc. we were trying 2 get mine yesterday with the fc datalogic and it wouldnt read on mine and the car is in need of a tune as when running on light throttle the air/fuel is running at 10.0 to 1 and lucky 2 get 250k to a tank of fuel. thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199312-power-fc-programs/
Share on other sites

I think the software my tuner uses is called "FC Pro" or something similar. Its all in english. 250km's a tank is not good. Is the 02 sensor hooked up/turned on for closed loop operation? Check that in your settings. My tuner advised to leave the function off while tuning/mapping so it doesnt adjust itself and keeps the values you enter. Then turn on the 02sensor for closed loop when finished mapping, which should get better fuel consumption.

hey thanks for the quick reply ill look into that program does any1 know of other programs as i have 3 vehicles that need to use it. i just put a new o2 sensor in it but cause it doesnt have a hand controler i cant get into anything 2 find out where the tune has gone out of wak as it was all in the vehicle when i bought it the serial number in the fc is (pfc er34 000-0021) if that helps.

FC datalogit should work fine with any PFC, i havent had one it wont read yet....

unless it it is the old white box, there are two versions and one does upto r33 (all GTR's though) and the other does r34 GTT and TOYOTA. If your in melb and stuck i can tune it for you.

old version

fc-box-con.jpg

new one is the same but black.

i see you said it works on R33gtr if it is the white one it wonk work on any R34GTT FC.

if it is the genuine apex pro software you will have the same drama.

you have the wrong harware your PFC will be fine guaranteed.

we were trying his copy of datalogit and it would conect but then would say check ecu conection and we were trying for about 2 hours trying 2 connect it up. it works fine in his 33gtr but it wont read in my gtt and a 34gtr v spec so could it b the early version. my pfc is a silver box 2 if that helps.

this person bought the program about 4 months ago so i presume its op to date. The product is the FC COMMANDER PRO XPORT and the number is 415-x910 will this cover the r34 and if it will r they locked 2 a certain vin. Thanks in advance

this person bought the program about 4 months ago so i presume its op to date. The product is the FC COMMANDER PRO XPORT and the number is 415-x910 will this cover the r34 and if it will r they locked 2 a certain vin. Thanks in advance

you need another link box as that is the genuine APEXI version and that model only suits the following models (same as early fc datalogit);

Nissan

414-N010 BNR34

414-N011 GTR33

414-N012 ECR33

414-N013 S14(1)

414-N014 SR2014

414-N015 SR2015

414-N016 SR2016

414-N017 SR2017

414-N018 SR2018

414-N019 SR2D19

414-N020 SR2D20

414-N021 SR2D21

414-N023 SR2D23

414-N024 SR2D24

414-N025 BNR34D

414-N026 GTR33D

414-N028 BNR34L

414-N029 GTR33L

Subaru

414-F003 GC8F

414-F005 GC8DL

Toyota

414-T006 SXE10

414-T007 ZT231

414-T008 ZW30

414-T009 J100A

414-T010 SXE10T

414-T011 J100M

414-T012 ZW30T

414-T013 SX10A

414-T014 SX10TA

Mazda

414-Z004 FD3S4

414-Z005 FD3S5

414-Z006 FD3S6

Honda

414-H003 AH03

414-H004 AH04

Mitsubishi

414-M001 CP9A6

414-M002 CP9A5

414-M003 EVO6D

414-M005 EVO5D

414-M007 CT9A7

414-M008 EVO7D

414-M902 D32AL

414-M905 D32AD

414-M907 CT9AL

414-M908 CT9AD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...