Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ROFL :) He did try and puch Irvines light out after Japan! Does that count? :)

I never reallyt liked Irvine, he was a good driver because the Britush press needed a good F1 driver. But i loved the guy off the track. How about " What a start to my Grand Prix career. I got punched by Senna in my first race, crashed in my second, destroyed four cars in my third and got banned from my fourth. People are going to think I'm some kind of nutter." :D

Irv the Perve.

He was the gigolo of the F1 circus. I remember reading somewhere that he thought horses were hung like him.

If Hamfist wants to be Senna esque he has to start punching lights out,lol.

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

WOOOOO

GO BMW :D

looks like Louis has been taking driving lessons from his old man

ROFL! Yeah, the writing was on the wall there mate... A porka and the Mac binned in the same week.

Dadas put the mocker on him,....maybe brainfade does run in the family after all.

so it occured to me this morning

why is Hamilton being punished for accidently running into the back of a competitor, and there was no punishment for kimi for what seemed to be just as stupid an accident?

Simple.

FIA - Ferrari Intervention Assistance.

Plus he wasnt doing 200mph... ( how f**king dumb was raikonnens comment? )

That is all.

Edited by m3gtr
Dont start on the Kimi / Monaco no penalty thing. One incident was under green flags and race conditions. The other was under a pace car and a closed pit lane exit. NO FARKING SIMILARITIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Uh, Uh , i think its valid.

So...its okay if its a green light and at 200mph possibly causing a fatality but daft and amateurish at the end of the pitlane?

Roy, call a spade a spade. Raikkonen did more than nearly cause a fatality- he destoryed F.I's chance to get a massive pile of cash for their troubles.

And he shrugged his shoulders and said oh well, thats racing.

The bullshit about FI not being given points because Sutil passed under Yellows is just the Ferrari bullshitspinners attempting to downplay the situation.

How is this any different>

*waits for Roy to go Nuclear*

Not nuclear. :D Seeing things differently is fine. You are looking at is like a concerned mother though, "...poor FI" Not objectively as a motorsport fan. :)

A mistake at speed in slick conditions under green race conditions, unfortunate and sad as it may be, is motorsport. To hit another car waiting at pit exit with another car, in clear dry conditions when the pace car is on the track is not on. I cant believe you dont see this.

It isnt about a Sutil being robbed of points, or Kimi beign robbed of points by Lewis. Its about regulations, and what Lewis did is unfortunate and only required a momentary lapse in concentration, but what he and Rosberg did is in my eyes undefendable. Rosberg is even worse as there was already 3 cars stopped, near stopped and he hit Lewis!!!!!!!!

And i have never raced a car, but help with servicing of cars and helped a guy run at the state level, and i am sure i am not the only one who sees what happened as about the worst thing a driver can do.

Pit lane has a whole lot of special conditions, it is speed limited and controlled as there are pit teams, equipment, media etc etc. Cars and ppl dont go well together.

LOL, and i cant let you slide with the nearly causing a fatality thing. That is laughable. Nobody was hurt in the accident, any accident can kill a driver. Motorsport is dangerous and there are flags and controls to try and minimise that risk. So under race conditions it is acceptable (but still unfortunate, but inevitable) that accidents will happen. Under safety cars and in pit lanes its a NO NO! It cant be accepted by the powers to be. Never has been acceptable, and never will be. Hell, lets just start disobeying yellow flags next, as Duncan touched on the lack of respect for the yellow is enough of a concern and something the FIA should try and reigh in. Pit lane is holy ground, you dont miss lights, dismiss warnings on the pit radio to check the pit lane exit light and you dont hit cars!

Not nuclear. :D Seeing things differently is fine. You are looking at is like a concerned mother though, "...poor FI" Not objectively as a motorsport fan. :)

A mistake at speed in slick conditions under green race conditions, unfortunate and sad as it may be, is motorsport. To hit another car waiting at pit exit with another car, in clear dry conditions when the pace car is on the track is not on. I cant believe you dont see this.

It isnt about a Sutil being robbed of points, or Kimi beign robbed of points by Lewis. Its about regulations, and what Lewis did is unfortunate and only required a momentary lapse in concentration, but what he and Rosberg did is in my eyes undefendable. Rosberg is even worse as there was already 3 cars stopped, near stopped and he hit Lewis!!!!!!!!

And i have never raced a car, but help with servicing of cars and helped a guy run at the state level, and i am sure i am not the only one who sees what happened as about the worst thing a driver can do.

Pit lane has a whole lot of special conditions, it is speed limited and controlled as there are pit teams, equipment, media etc etc. Cars and ppl dont go well together.

LOL, and i cant let you slide with the nearly causing a fatality thing. That is laughable. Nobody was hurt in the accident, any accident can kill a driver. Motorsport is dangerous and there are flags and controls to try and minimise that risk. So under race conditions it is acceptable (but still unfortunate, but inevitable) that accidents will happen. Under dafety cars and in pit lanes its a NO NO!

Correct me if im wrong, but wasnt the accident in Monaco under the safety car?

Not nuclear. :D Seeing things differently is fine. You are looking at is like a concerned mother though, "...poor FI" Not objectively as a motorsport fan. :)

A mistake at speed in slick conditions under green race conditions, unfortunate and sad as it may be, is motorsport. To hit another car waiting at pit exit with another car, in clear dry conditions when the pace car is on the track is not on. I cant believe you dont see this.

It isnt about a Sutil being robbed of points, or Kimi beign robbed of points by Lewis. Its about regulations, and what Lewis did is unfortunate and only required a momentary lapse in concentration, but what he and Rosberg did is in my eyes undefendable. Rosberg is even worse as there was already 3 cars stopped, near stopped and he hit Lewis!!!!!!!!

And i have never raced a car, but help with servicing of cars and helped a guy run at the state level, and i am sure i am not the only one who sees what happened as about the worst thing a driver can do.

Pit lane has a whole lot of special conditions, it is speed limited and controlled as there are pit teams, equipment, media etc etc. Cars and ppl dont go well together.

LOL, and i cant let you slide with the nearly causing a fatality thing. That is laughable. Nobody was hurt in the accident, any accident can kill a driver. Motorsport is dangerous and there are flags and controls to try and minimise that risk. So under race conditions it is acceptable (but still unfortunate, but inevitable) that accidents will happen. Under dafety cars and in pit lanes its a NO NO!

Heres the rub Roy.

Hamfists accident was just that - Stupid.

Raikkonnen on the other hand was downright dangerous.

And he walked away without even so much as a slap on the wrist.

no

first lap after they were released

I still think Raikkonen should have been penalised as well. Its not even arguable in my eyes, pits being holy ground or not.

As you saw, KR parked ALONG side Kubica. Thats poor form before the accident. They were having a squabble over track position but ended up side by side at the pit lane exit.

Raikkonen should have pulled in behind Kubica - simple as that.

To be fair, Hammos brainfade is a little less serious when you look at it from this perspective.

Raikkonen should not have been where he was in the first place.

It is such a conspiracy that a Ferrari driver was excluded from the results last year for running the light. Hamilton not only crossed the line under red he belted another car up the keifer and pushed a stationay car accross the line to boot!

Why is this even being discussed?

It is such a conspiracy that a Ferrari driver was excluded from the results last year for running the light. Hamilton not only crossed the line under red he belted another car up the keifer and pushed a stationay car accross the line to boot!

Why is this even being discussed?

umm, this is an F1 thread, is it not?

Dont start on the Kimi / Monaco no penalty thing. One incident was under green flags and race conditions in the wet at speed. The other was under a pace car and a closed pit lane exit. In perfect visibility and the dry !

NO FARKING SIMILARITIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ah Brisby...You save so much of my time with your posts :D

Heres the rub Roy.

Hamfists accident was just that - Stupid.

Raikkonnen on the other hand was downright dangerous.

And he walked away without even so much as a slap on the wrist.

Racing 750hp, 600kg cars in the wet is downright dangerous. It's called motor sport princess.

I still think Raikkonen should have been penalised as well. Its not even arguable in my eyes, pits being holy ground or not.

As you saw, KR parked ALONG side Kubica. Thats poor form before the accident. They were having a squabble over track position but ended up side by side at the pit lane exit.

Raikkonen should have pulled in behind Kubica - simple as that.

To be fair, Hammos brainfade is a little less serious when you look at it from this perspective.

Raikkonen should not have been where he was in the first place.

Yeah, If Raikkonen pulled in behind Kubica, your mate Hamilton more than likely would've taken them both out. If he can't see 2 flashing red lights and 2 cars PARKED side by side waiting for them to go green, what chance does he have of seeing 2 flashing red lights and the rear end of only 1 car parked in front of him...

Yeah, If Raikkonen pulled in behind Kubica, your mate Hamilton more than likely would've taken them both out. If he can't see 2 flashing red lights and 2 cars PARKED side by side waiting for them to go green, what chance does he have of seeing 2 flashing red lights and the rear end of only 1 car parked in front of him...

Yes, all very valid points. Dont forget that Dennis said on the radio "watch the lights on exit" Just one of those things. Driers have to absorb and process so much information. Sometimes they miss the obvious. :thumbsup:

Whitmarsh's comments were a bit disappointing. Thought it was a bit petty that he came out and hinted that its open season on McLaren and penalty time. LOL, has he forgetten there is a Williams in the judgement as well? At least Dennis said, bugger its one of those things.

Heres the rub Roy.

Hamfists accident was just that - Stupid.

Raikkonnen on the other hand was downright dangerous.

And he walked away without even so much as a slap on the wrist.

funnily enough, at that race, I think Kimi was trying to play it safe and break a bit earlier so not to runn into the back of Sutil but unfortunately, the braking point was on a wet patch on a corner. At least thats what I read from majority of the websites.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're not the first person that's said that about this car lol. A Touring wagon GT in Spark yellow mica would be the dog's danglies 😆 I will keep an eye out for a future purchase for sure. The seats are almost like the OEM Recaros... electric adjustment for fore/aft and tilt movements except reclining.   
    • Yes!! I love these! It's a shame its not the wagon though!   Thank everything that's holy that it doesn't have the interior of the Aussie delivered ones. Those seats are so much nicer.  
    • I'm both sorry and thankful that you do that. 
    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
×
×
  • Create New...