Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If I could go back I'd have gotten an early start on bench press while I was still young to balance it out.

Yer not to downplay 45kg as it took me some time to get to that, but for gym newbies it just doesn't sound like much when you compare it to core exercises like bench press, lateral exercises etc. further emphasising our point that isolation exercises don't need much weight particularly if it's a small muscle group.

Like a lot of us blokes I used to come into the gym and default to bench press and bicep exercises - not paying enough attention to triceps or lats... as you say, in hindsight you'd opt for a better balanced routine!

It's true it will raise your base metabolic rate because you burn through alot of energy when lifting and it will lose you some weight. Cardio is what really burns through the fat though. Combination of both will serve you well. Cardio also helps you to get through your workout easier and vice versa.

Both rugby and AFL players seem to put more emphasis on athleticism than brute strength these days.

As B said put more emphasis on the cardio, but you've got the right idea in not forgoing the weights altogether. Even though you're not training for strength, you can do weight training (45 min) followed by 20-30min cardio. The weight training done prior will continue to use up glycogen stores and burn calories even an hour after you've finished, whereas the more heart-rate-intensive cardio will tend to burn the calories nearer the time when you're doing it. This is one reason not to blindly believe the "Calories" readout on the cardio machine you're using as it doesn't tell the whole story. I've had great results by doing weights and cardio one after the other.

If you *are* trying to lose weight as a goal, then I suppose it is okay to do multiple exercises (as in a 'circuit' routine). Using lighter weights and minimal rest periods in between will get your heart rate going and encourage some fat loss (as in callisthenics). The goal would be to move from one station to the other with as little time in between as possible. I would probably still prefer to limit the number of muscle groups involved in one session though, and mix it up from session to session to provide some variety (necessary both for the body and for the mind in terms of motivation!). Having said that, doing leg exercises as part of your weights will help to burn fat quite effectively as they are a large muscle group and hence burn those calories well; while leg curls are good for the hammies, keep up those squats and lunges as they also incorporate some upper body to help provide more of a whole-body workout too. Use your trainer to make sure your squatting form is good otherwise you can do yourself some nasty injuries.

took me ages reading the last page, some good info.

Most young guys started off in the gym working pecs and biceps right? I know I did, perhaps thats because I had no guidance though.

also agree on the delt training, really do not need much weight at all if you are trying to isolate them.

Question, how much weight do you guys use on a front raise for shoulders and what kind of form do you use?

Edited by gersfan

Not a huge fan of front raises, I always thought they'd be bad for the lower back and rotator cuff...that said I have a weird left shoulder that seems to pop out when it feels like it lol, so gauging that by my own retarded body. Anyone ever hurt themselves doing front raises?

Yeah I don't really do front raises as I don't concentrate on them TOO much during my shoulder workouts as they kinda get trained from the chest workout as well. The only front raises I do are close grip but they are an exercise for traps, get a nice squeeze out of them :)

yeh i do front raises... with 12kg dumbells.. do one arm simulataneously (spellcheck anyone??).. i find that if you do a two arm front raise... you have very little balance and your arms are locked in to the position which is a little unnatural as you get to the top of the movement...

Birds... this is probably why your shoulder popped out.... at the top of the movement, your rear delts kick in and your lats pull together... squeezing the shoulders out... doing one arm front raise allows your body to twist a little so your shoulder can handle lifting the weight to 90 degrees..

p.s. im also like you... skinny kid in school.... will never be a "big" guy.... wide back but fark all chest.. haha.

think about it... you cant swing your shoulder in a complete circle... it will swing fine by your side... but at some point it has to go wide when it is nearing 90 degrees and from there it will go out sideways until the joint allows it to come back in to your body... if your arms are locked on to a flat bar... where can they go???

but if you swing one arm... your body can twist a little and you can make that arm go in a perfect straight circle.

also, id like to share a piece of info that i only learned over the weekend... some people may know it, some people might not...

flexing and posing helps with muscularity and blood pump... say after doing a chest set... if you flex and hold a pose for a minute or two... it will help with muscle seperation and get more blood flowing to that area... how you flex and what you "pop" can make a big difference to the shape of your muscle as it grows.... this can be the difference between a sunken but wide and blocky pec, or a short, sharp, but bulbous pec.

cheers

Linton

Apologies Linton, I should have clarified that my shoulder pop is actually a naturally occurring rotator cuff dislocation thing that I've had since I was very young. It doesn't give me any trouble or pain (I can actually make it pop on purpose, good party trick), but I do avoid putting weight on it when the shoulder is in that particular position (i.e. arm near or above head and moving out to the side) and have never bothered to see if front raises affect it or not (I just assumed the exercise would interfere) for fear of damaging the joint.

Behind neck shoulder press is the only isolated shoulder exercise I do and for some reason this doesn't affect it - I'm guessing because the other arm keeps it balanced and strict as per using a barbell. Might try front raises both ways (simultaneous and alternating) with small weights and see which is better for me, but interestingly, I suspect your method would actually make it pop given the pop occurs when my arm moves out to the side pivoting away from the body. Two handed front raise on a barbell is probably worse for lower back but probably better for my retarded shoulder because it will keep the arm in line with the body as best it can.

*curses the asymmetric properties of the human body*

And yeah, agree on the flexing/posing front after sets. Seems to make sense. I imagine it prevents the muscle from tightening into something of a knot. Similar in effect to a wide range of motion.

took me ages reading the last page, some good info.

Most young guys started off in the gym working pecs and biceps right? I know I did, perhaps thats because I had no guidance though.

also agree on the delt training, really do not need much weight at all if you are trying to isolate them.

Question, how much weight do you guys use on a front raise for shoulders and what kind of form do you use?

Don't do front raises these days, I need more focus on rear delts, just like you said I've worked the pecs and biceps too much in the past, relative to the back and tris. I will do side raises and overhead dumbell shoulder presses though.

*curses the asymmetric properties of the human body*

Yep. And I was just reading a respected bloke's article today about how your ratio of chest / leg girth should be around 1.7 or lower... Need to get back into the leg workouts more!

1.7 damn, I think I need to hit the leg weights too lol. Easily the most neglected muscle group!

Should add that my shoulder popped whilst I was cursing the assymetrical properties of the human body with my left arm...now that's irony.

Okay, 1.7 is prob ambitious for the intermediate gym-goer (like me)?

0 to 1.7 Congratulations, you have thighs of death!

1.7 to 1.85 Great legs, nicely proportioned to your torso

1.85 to 2.0 Your legs are lagging a bit but not bad

>2.0 You have severe chicken-leg syndrome

Taken from this guy's website - love his work - explains things clearly and doesn't seem full of himself - doesn't have ads on his page or charge a membership, etc etc. so you get the sense he's motivated by helping people and his love of the sport, as opposed to making money.

http://scoobysworkshop.com/legs.htm

This guy is great and I'd recommend all his videos to anyone. His vids were the first I ever used to get my form down and I'm glad I found these before others as his form is excellent. He obviously knows what he's doing, looks like he's got quite a big fanbase nowdays.

They dont work, have a Mate whos a PT, he doesn't suggest it to any of hes clients. I dont remember the reasoning, but a better diet will work better than these (in a healthy way)

Wow thanks man, you've totally changed my perception of whatever it is you're talking about. Not only, but I will be looking to consult you for further advice on topics because of your connection to an expert in the field who has obviously learnt more in his certificate courses than all of us combined in our years of training. Care to elaborate some?!?!

Cheers.

http://www.thepumpingstation.com/1repmax.html

A great little tool to help you workout what you should be lifting per set, ie 10reps warmup, 10reps touch heavier, 8 reps work set then 8 reps heaviest work set.

Andy, what was working for me was a weights session and then straight into 20mins flat out on the punch bag.

Consistancy is the key and about 4 times a week is good, maybe break it up with weghts and a run one day on the weekend.

Either way I dropped 10+ kg in 3 months with this routine.

Wow thanks man, you've totally changed my perception of whatever it is you're talking about. Not only, but I will be looking to consult you for further advice on topics because of your connection to an expert in the field who has obviously learnt more in his certificate courses than all of us combined in our years of training. Care to elaborate some?!?!

Cheers.

he must have read the title, clicked it and just typed reply instead of reading 44 pages

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Maf is a question mark but TPS  I have set at 0.47, the fact that I’m getting proper voltage range out of it with the key on leads me to believe it’s functioning properly. I’m getting proper voltages on basically everything. I still need to look up voltage ranges for z32 maf and test that 
    • Honestly no not at all, but it’s a very basic tune, it’s stock injectors q45 tps and z32 maf. Other than that it’s a completely stock base map. The file is from nistune and from my understanding if it was tune related I would be able to unplug maf and tps and it would still start even if it was a really shitty start. I have tried starting it with coolant temp, maf, and tps unplugged none of those 3 togethor or individually changes anything 
    • 🏆 Skyline Supremacy Meets Mount Panorama Magic 🏆 Join SAU NSW as we take the long way to Bathurst, the home of GTR greatness. Saturday 30th August 2025 7:00AM Meeting Hanna Park North Richmond 7:30AM Departure Cruise Via Bells of Line Road 9:00AM Arrival to Stop 1: Golden Poplars Meadow Flat 9:45AM Arrival to Final Destination: Mount Panorama Motor Racing Circuit Meet Location: Hanna Park North Richmond Stop 1: Golden Poplars Meadow Flat Final Destination: Mount Panorama Motor Racing Circuit   *Disclaimer* There will be a lead and follow car so no one should get lost. If you would like to attend or bring others along please put your name down and a +1 as numbers will be needed prior! This is NOT a race and we will all be adhering to all road rules. If this is what you want please come to one of our many track days. This is an official SAU:NSW event and will be run under a CAMS permit. One of the things that really sets our club apart is our commitment to being true enthusiasts. When on normal roads we strive to maintain good relations with the authorities as well as the public in general. When attending one of Skylines Australia NSW events please try to: • Be aware of surrounding environment and act accordingly. • Drive courteously on the state’s roads as a true enthusiast should. • Understand how important it is to maintain the good name of SAU NSW and thus, treat others accordingly. • Any misbehavior will not be tolerated and you will be asked to leave.
    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day   Highway gets as low as 10l/100km on my end so I'm not as worried about it being a mechanical issue. More likely just the tune on the haltech.
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
×
×
  • Create New...