Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well Max's is well known brand, and just because its cheap doesn't mean its poor quality. They sell large packets and often don't use plastic tubs, using a bag instead. It's fine if you've got a container at home you can transfer it into, it just means cheaper prices.

You should give the bulk nutrients stuff a whirl.

cheaper and mixes better, you'll be surprised how much better haha, i was shocked.

I would but this stuff honestly mixes fine. Regular shaker, shake for 5-10seconds and its like a chocolate milkshake. I've got a mate who always drinks it when he comes over but refuses to buy it himself because it tastes too good. Mind you I'm taking a weight gainer, not a pure protein. It contains no suger, but they typically do taste better.

I like Max's, there a good brand but I think they are pretty expensive. There WPI is really good if you can justify spending the extra coin, I've got a tub at home (got it for free for being a gold member :D). But I generally opt for Optimum Nutrition.

Righto thought id give raw eggs a go

been eating 4-6 of them a day, 2 raw in the morning 2 raw before bed and 2 cooked after training

the ones i have raw i mix in with casine protein, light lactose free milk

pretty much using it as a fuel before training and as a filler while i sleep.. no eggs dont contain the most protein but they are a good fuel and have good fats

one thing i have noticied is that im no longer hungry in the morning when i wake up, which has to be a good thing!

and yes i am aware of the arguments of cooked vs uncooked eggs, white vs yokes etc as well as the very off chance of salminala

anyone given raw eggs a go? what did you think of it?

Put everything aside and what's the point? Why not cook them?

If you're that strapped for time that you can't spare 3 minutes to cook some eggs, then cook a shit load all at once and eat them as you want, they won't taste any worse reheated than they would raw...

They dont taste like anything and it's easy as hell just to throw them in a shake...

Re heating them in a micro wave nukes them so no won't be doing that

Anyway how they taste or making time to cook them is not what I'm interested in...

I wanna know if people have seen results with upping their egg intake

apparently raw eggs are a no-no. cook them. something to do with if they're not cooked they don't provide the enzyme to digest them properly or something which equates to not getting the most protein out of them? somebody should research and provide a proper answer though :P

apparently raw eggs are a no-no. cook them. something to do with if they're not cooked they don't provide the enzyme to digest them properly or something which equates to not getting the most protein out of them? somebody should research and provide a proper answer though :P

http://www.livestrong.com/article/264564-raw-egg-protein-facts/

I would cook it just for lowering the chance of salmonella poisoning. Oh...and you absorb a *lot* more protein when its cooked :)

I cook eggs every morning... whole process takes me about 5min... I wouldn't eat them raw, taste awesome cooked with a bit of s&p

noticed a big change when I changed from so called 'healthy' breaky cereals and oats to eggs, beans, avo, chicken etc... no comparison and now I'm addicted to big hot breakfasts

my wife boils heaps of eggs every week and I grab one if I want a snack... banana, some nuts or a boiled egg keeps me from gnawing my arm off with hunger :thumbsup:

I normally eat 2 boiled eggs mid morning, cant stomach a big breaky so I just have a shake of protein concentrate (slow release) and sometimes ad creatine or carboplex multidexrtren for added carbs and 2-3 weetbix.

You guys should try Reflex, hands down the best supplement brand out there, I've tried just about all the brands and all the stuff sold at GNC or wherever really is complete rubbish, they all contain fillers and flour. Theres no testing of all the stuff they sell, really any numpty who wants to can make there own supplements and sell them, atleast Reflex is ISO tested and stuff like that.

Be carefull what pre-workouts you guys are taking, stuff like no explode are high in caffine and other rubbish. Dont listen to all the crap most of the guys tell you, its all marketing. Your body will get used to the caffine and after a few weeks the affects wont be as good.

If anyone is wanting to loose fat while gaining please be aware the time and frequency of your meals as it makes a huge difference. Im skinny so I've never had to worry to much but I have noticed a difference in body fat by eating 4-5 small meals a day and keeping your high carb and high glycemic foods to the morning and no later then mid afternoon. You can still eat before bed just dont eat anything that will increase your insulin. High insulin levels while doing nothing ie sitting down watching tv will make you store fat. Same goes for big meals, if you eat big meals all the time your body gets used to having excess energy and stores it as fat, if you eat more frequently your body will use most if not all the food consumed as energy and you won't store fat, you can even stay hungry for a little, say 15-30 mins before eating because your body wont eat muscle it will eat fat first, your body will only start eating muscle in extreme cases like not eating for 5-6 hours.

ive ripped a couple of posts from a body building thread that everyone might find interesting

first post:

Hunger doesn't mean muscle loss. In fact, most of the time it doesn't even mean you actually need to eat. Limbic Hunger is mental, and it causes you to be hungry around the times you normally eat due to the release of grehlin, which increases hunger and rises when you're in anticipation of a meal. Somatic Hunger is actual physical hunger that occurs when your stomach has been empty for a while. Grehlin can be released then as well.

Leptin increases hunger when body fat decreases, but it doesn't just increase when you 'don't cheat', and a cheat won't 'reset' leptin levels.

A lot of things cause hunger, so keep that in mind. Morbidly obese people don't stop getting hungry, despite the fact that they have plenty of body fat to use for energy.

Therefore, you can be hungry for many hours before actually losing any muscle. Fast for over a day, and then you might lose some muscle.

second post

Here's the thing- you pretty much ARE always undergoing catabolism. But guess what? You're also performing anabolism all the time too! Catabolism = breaking down. Anabolism = building up. These words aren't just associated with muscle (except on bb.com). Your body is constantly breaking down dietary nutrients and synthesizing protein, glucose, and triglycerides your body can actually use. You're also constantly tearing down and repairing muscle tissues. Your bodily functions never stop, and catabolism and anabolism follow a natural cycle for repair and growth. You catabolize fat for energy LONG before you catabolize muscle. Think in terms of days, not hours.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...