Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well technically, any aftermarket manifold is illegal as its a modification :P

However you will normally only get into trouble on what is mounted to the that manifold.

Most people from my experiences stick with the low mount manifolds on smaller, lower cost, normally interally gated turbo upgrades. Bolt on HKS and Trust turbos are good to low mount. Where people go to a high mount turbo is when the turbo becomes too small to fit in a low mount position and a gate is required. Plus it looks better in the engine bay as well.

My 2 cents

I would try and stay with a low mount if it's going to be a street driven car. It'll look more standard then a turbo staring at you when a cop pulls you over.

It really depends if the turbo will fit down low. Not sure on which one would perform better though. :P

I would try and stay with a low mount if it's going to be a street driven car. It'll look more standard then a turbo staring at you when a cop pulls you over.

It really depends if the turbo will fit down low. Not sure on which one would perform better though. :P

Unless you get a HKS cast low mount manifold, it really doesn't matter.

Have you seen a custom made low mount manifold? You have these tubes curving up then down into a collector, It's just as "attention seeking" as a top mount and can in no way be mistaken for a "std manifold" Not having a go or anything, just stating that if you're worried about cops, defects, etc, neither is any good, just stick with the std manifold. At the same time, if you're modifying to the extent that you are considering a manifold, then there will be 100 other things for the cops to pick on, what's one more :).

Unless you get a HKS cast low mount manifold, it really doesn't matter.

Have you seen a custom made low mount manifold? You have these tubes curving up then down into a collector, It's just as "attention seeking" as a top mount and can in no way be mistaken for a "std manifold" Not having a go or anything, just stating that if you're worried about cops, defects, etc, neither is any good, just stick with the std manifold. At the same time, if you're modifying to the extent that you are considering a manifold, then there will be 100 other things for the cops to pick on, what's one more :).

Honestly, no, I haven't. I would've just assumed that it would be similar to the standard one, but higher flowing. :P

well if ya get one make sure to get a big heat shield made up from a metal fabricator.If done properly it can look close to standard and hide a lot of goodies as well as insulating heat....well its a thought

The quality custom made manifolds, like 6boost, Extreme Turbo Manifolds (ETM), etc , have an option to ceramic coat it. This acts as a great insulator. You can also buy a turbo blanket, that covers the ext. housing.

For my set-up (high-mount) i have chosen to ceramic coat the manifold, get a heat shield custom fabricated by my mechanic and use thermal straps for the dump/down pipe. The heat shield will also cover the top part of the dump pipe, as i do not like the look of the thermal wrap.

Im going the top mount setup in my car

Will be using a Blanket for the turbo and a heat shield for the dump made up by a fabricator

The Thermal wrap is no good as Ive heard for everyday driving and most exhaust places/fabricators once they've made a dump will not warranty the product.

as for top mounts ive heard more lag then low mount is this true

Im going the top mount setup in my car

Will be using a Blanket for the turbo and a heat shield for the dump made up by a fabricator

The Thermal wrap is no good as Ive heard for everyday driving and most exhaust places/fabricators once they've made a dump will not warranty the product.

as for top mounts ive heard more lag then low mount is this true

Thermal wrap does over time "crystallize" the metal, thus making it more prone to crack. I am not too fussed about that, as my car is not a daily and a dump/down pipe is easy and cheap to replace. I am more interested in keeping heat temps down and protecting the cabling, lines, etc in that area, that's why i am using the thermal wrap and a fabricated shield; ie: two layers of shielding.

Even though i have no proof, i would say that whoever told you top mounts are more laggy than bottom mounts are ill informed. Look at the 6boost "low-mount" manifold above, what makes that less laggy than a 6boost top-mount manifold? :D

They look very similar.

BTW what turbo will you be using?

i could of been ill informed thats just what i was told. Yes they do look very similar in design probably wont lag.. hope not

My car will be a daily, so need to protect the dump from cracking (if or when it ever does) and other aspects of the engine bay, a heat shield should be ok as im not running 1/4 times on the roads

I have a 500hp T04 that i will be using with other supporting mods.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...