Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was always under that impression too, that late model road registered cars didn't need a secondary fastening system. But the CAMS general requirements (Schedule B number 1) says otherwise http://www.camsmanual.com.au/pdf/general/0...le_A_B_Q308.pdf Looks like it might be a change as its bold and underlined.

I made a trip to Bunnings last night, bought some plastic sheathed 3mm wire rope, a couple of clamps and a turnbuckle link and made something similar. I'm not drilling anything - looped the wire around the rad support and clamped it, and the turnbuckle goes through a loop in the other end of the wire rope and will latch onto one of the strikers for the bonnet latches - the Supra has 2 factory strikers and catches on the bonnet so it may not have required this anyway. Took all of about 15 mintues to throw together and cost about $18, and $12 of that was the 10M coil of wire rope. If they had that on a reel sold by the meter it would have been almost $10 cheaper.

  • 3 years later...

thread dig

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Secondary-bonnet-restraint-Drift-JDM-ke70-s13-skyline-/300644790174?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item45ffd36f9e

Anything particularly wrong with this? don't want to take any chances with my bonnet.

comes with a battery triangle as well :D

WRX days down here have been requiring them, plus i just want the extra security for peace of mind. I'm not 100% sure if my catch setup classifies as standard, i believe it is but I rather like my bonnet and i'm happy to add a little extra safety in case of a freak accident

The usual bonnet pins are illegal on a road registered car because they can be a pedestrian hazard so I would question any sup regs that in effect require a road registered car to be illegal. I know of a bloke who was defected because his car had a tow hook sticking out the front a bit.

wouldn't even contemplate bonnet pins. I'm pretty sure they were requiring a secondary restraint even for standard bonnets at the last day i went to. They let me go as i said i'm pretty sure my setup was the same as factory, but they said for next time to have one.

but looks like the ebay one is a go-er, so i'll just grab one of them. Cheers! :D

Remember, part of the reasoning behind demanding secondary bonnet catches is when people used to fit bonnet pins to their race / rally cars they'd remove the standard catch completely. This is fine, but given the number of times bonnets get opened between stages / track sessions, a lot of people forget to do the pins up properly (I've seen it happen a lot of times). This is why leaving the standard catch is a good measure - it offers some protection. In the case of a standard road registered car, I don't see any benefit in adding pins in addition to the standard (working) catch. If the rules don't require a secondary catch on a modern, registered car then this makes perfect sense to me, when you think wbout where the ruling came from in the first place.

The bonnet pins on my Civic were alloy, and had been through hell and back. They were about to snap, yet were still considered OK (standard cable release has been removed, but the secondary latch is still there). I've replaced the pins with Aerocatch pins which satisfies road and CAMS regulations (not that the car is ever likely to be registered during my ownership)

That ebay strap you showed looks as good as anything I've seen used on registered road cars with properly working standard catches. If you're being forced to use one, then that should do the job IMO

Edited by warps

I'll try again... the CAMS rule requiring this has been changed for 2012.

NEW CAMS Schedule A&B

Schedule B

EACH AUTOMOBILE (EXCEPT A SUPERKART) SHALL, OF NECESSITY, IN ANY SPEED EVENT OR RACE BE:

1. fitted with two separate fasteners on any bonnet or other panel where the leading edge can be raised. The fastening systems shall meet the following requirements:

(a) to be deemed separate, a fastening system shall continue to function if the second system is removed in its entirety;

(b) they shall be of adequate strength and limited extensibility;

© they shall simultaneously hold the bonnet or panel closed or as an alternative for speed events only, one fastening system shall hold the bonnet or panel closed and its release shall allow the bonnet or panel to be raised to provide access to a second fastening system fitted within the vehicle. The second fastening system shall prevent the bonnet or panel from being raised more than 150mm from the fully closed position.

In a speed event, a road registered series production car fitted with an unmodified original equipment two-stage fastening system shall be exempt from these requirements

I wasn't disagreeing with you, Harry. Just adding some history to where the rule came from, and how it has been misinterpreted in the past. These latest changes make sense, as secondary restraints were redundant on unmodified, working OEM catches.

Still, if an event demands it in their supp regs, I don't think you can get around it, regardless of what the CAMS manual says. You might convince toe organisers to change it in the future, but you have to comply with the Supp Regs at the time.

yes if its in the supp regs you'll still need it, but 99% of the time things like bonnet fasteners, fire extinguishers etc are not in the supp regs because they're required under CAMS General Requirements anyway.

If they are in the supp regs, I'd email the organisers to update them inline with the current Schedule B - where they got it from in the first place. CAMS changed this requirement to encourage participation and make it a bit easier for road cars to enter.

That Schedule B Harry posted applies only to front opening bonnets, wonder if there are any requirements for rear openers. In my experience with a rear opener air pressure in the engine bay at speed lifts the back up quite a bit if it is unlatched.

that rule has always only been for front opening bonnets. A rear opening bonnet has never needed the extra restraint. while air pressure may want to lift it, it will never be able to fly up and cover your windscreen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok i will get those 310mm. I found one but on a different site. This is the description on those...is it ok? Technical parameters: - Axle: front. - Disc type: ventilated. - Number of holes: 5. - Disc diameter: 310mm. - Total height with center: 54mm. - Thickness (new/min.): 30/28mm. - Designed for brake calipers manufacturer: Sumitomo.
    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
×
×
  • Create New...