Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ok with many thanks to Ferni :D I have hosted some vids from PI....enjoy...

Hack but clear one lap sprint

Collection of misc stuff

BB popping some flamage

hey what sort of camera mount did you use? did you put it on after scrutineering? anyone say anythign about it?

Thanks Ant,

Looks good apart from all the fumey smoke coming out of siberia coming from my car. Had no idea it was that bad.

Might need to confirm with he who shall be obeyed that I haven't broken something.

I cracked my front right rotor so will need a new set before the 29/3 WRX event.

Regards

Andrew

Ant, im going to start calling you "The Wheel Man" Nice work

Ahahaha...well that has a nicer ring to it than the names I normally get called :D

hey what sort of camera mount did you use? did you put it on after scrutineering? anyone say anythign about it?

Well I did buy one that used to get clamped to the headrest mount of the passenger seat of my gtst....unfor the same isn't available in the GTR so I made one out of ali box tube that bolts to the baby seat mounts on the parcel shelf. Wasn't too bad but a little refinement should reduce the shakes a bit. Nah had it on for scrutineering but this was a piarc day so they didn't look too hard!

Thanks Ant,

Looks good apart from all the fumey smoke coming out of siberia coming from my car. Had no idea it was that bad.

Might need to confirm with he who shall be obeyed that I haven't broken something.

I cracked from front right rotor so will need a new set before the 29/3 WRX event.

No probs mate :D Yeah there was a fair bit of smoke....my car used to do the same when I had the exxon valdez tune and no catch can...since both have been attended to it seems much cleaner. Bugger about the rotor...they looked fine on the day but with the dust filling the cracks it was hard to tell.....still can't get over how loud they 'cracked' when cooling down!

Nice, thanks for the info..using a baby seat mount is a sound idea..ive got one but it uses suction cups which I don't think they'd like..

Hahaha probably not if its the only method of attachment. The latest CAMS manual (online) now has a camera mounting section and club days now have the option of secifiying that in their regs or not. I think as long as it is safe and secure they won't have a prob. Not only is mine held in place by the two hefty baby seat bolts but I strap the camera to a secure part of the mount using some coated braided steel cable.




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...