Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok bright spark - why buy a 42psi pump that is going to max out straight away?

Why not be smart and get a 275lph @ 70psi pump and have peice of mind that the pump isn't going beyond its intended purpose?

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

ok bright spark - why buy a 42psi pump that is going to max out straight away?

Why not be smart and get a 275lph @ 70psi pump and have peice of mind that the pump isn't going beyond its intended purpose?

You buy the pump after looking at whether it's suitable for your application. If you only need 158lph at your desired boost level, the walbro can supply 204lph and the nismo can supply 300lph, why would you take the nismo at 3 times the price?

because the $200 255lph walboro is a 42psi pump is intended for NA applications....

So you want to put a NA fuel pump that can only handle low pressure into your turbo charged car?

A HP version of the Walboro is around the $280 - $300 mark, and is 255lph. AND you need to modify the f**k out of everything to get it to fit, and its even more of a pain in the ass when it doesn't touch the bottom of the tank.

The Nismo from Greenline is $330, is 275lph at 70psi, comes on its own bracket, has its own plug, and takes about 5 minutes to install. Oh, and it touches the bottom of the tank.

Now if you're going to go to all that trouble modifying brackets, soldering plugs and being just a general stuff around, just to save probably $50, for a pump that is about half the quality.

I'd rather Spend the extra $50, get a bigger pump, one that is designed buy manufacturer themselves (Nismo is in bed with Nissan) and something that is bullet proof.

Also, if you say "well not all of us can spare $50" then why did you buy a skyline and intend on modding it?

Edited by The Mafia

I'm not talking about the non-HP pump. I'm not even sure why that pump comes up in discussions, since it clearly was not made for turbo cars, and is marketed as being for relatively low-pressure NA applications. No-one should be putting one into a turbo skyline.

UAS in sydney sell the HP version for $240. Have you actually installed one of these? Sure the nismo is easier to install since you don't have to actually do anything, but I fitted the walbro myself and it was nowhere near the headache you're suggesting.

It's a matter of cutting the bottom plate off the stock bracket (normal wire cutters will do it), putting 2 clamps on to hold the walbro and using 2 crimp connectors to connect the wires. I'm not exaggerating how easy it was.

Also, my walbro sits lower in the tank than the stock pump.

Why do you say the walbro is lesser quality? The nismo is expensive so it must be made of unobtanium? Nismo are a bit of a jack of all trades, i'd say a manufacturer specialising in fuel pump/fuel delivery systems would have the know-how to build the highest quality pump.

Edited by govich

An N/A engine making 500 bhp will quite happily run at 8 psi with a carby (that's Low Pressure), and 38 psi with injectors (that's High Pressure). A turbo engine may need up to 72 psi to make its 500 bhp. So picking a fuel pump based on some non specific rating of "High Pressure" is useless if you are looking at a turbo application.

A fuel pump is simply an electric motor with a pump on the end of the output shaft. If you want more flow you use a bigger pump, if you want more pressure you use a larger electric motor. Pressure is directly related to the torque output of the electric motor, torque in an electric motor is directly proportional to the size of its rotor. There is no magic in electric motors, if you want more pressure you need a physically bigger motor.

Before I get into the graphs, it is worth mentioning that manufacturer's fuel pump ratings are usually done at 12 volts (battery voltage), whereas the running voltage (alternator ouput) is commonly 13.8 volts. Hence testing is often done at both voltages.

Keeping the above in mind, please tell me how anybody would think that the Walbro can get anywhere near the Bosch looking at the following picture;

boschpump.jpg

Now take a look at the flow charts noting how the Wablro drops off in flow as the pressure rises;

flowtest-walbro.gif

Do the comparison, a STANDARD R33GTR pump flows 235 l/h at 25psi compared to 210 l/h at 25 psi for the Walbro

flowtest-nissan.gif

That's the data, you make you own judgement. In case you were still wondering what I use, the race cars all have Bosch fuel pumps and the road cars have standard GTR pumps.

Cheers

Gary

That's the data, you make you own judgement. In case you were still wondering what I use, the race cars all have Bosch fuel pumps and the road cars have standard GTR pumps.

Cheers

Gary

Interesting that the stock GTR pump flows more than the walbro.

This still doesn't change the fact that if you want to run sane turbos on a (street) RB25, the walbro will perform well. It will theoretically flow enough to max out 550cc/min injectors up to about 25psi boost pressure at 13.5V (from the first graph).

I really don't understand why everyone feels compelled to have fuel pumps capable of flowing 200+lph at very high boost pressures (>30psi) in their RB25-powered whatever that will never see above 16-18psi (generalising to the majority of examples here, obviously there are extreme examples that need the flow).

Maybe it's just all the engineering lectures (and experience) steering me towards picking something that suits the application rather than allows ridiculous safety margins.

PS. I disagree with your physical size comment. There is more to an electric motor than "the size of the rotor" - number of windings, magnet strength (material density) etc. I would be willing to bet that there are fuel pumps around that are physically bigger than the walbro (as it is pretty damn small) with lesser flow capabilities. Even the stock R33 GTS25t pump is noticeably bigger.

Edited by govich
Maybe it's just all the engineering lectures (and experience) steering me towards picking something that suits the application rather than allows ridiculous safety margins.

Thats right, your engineering logic has no place here. This is import tuning, you fit wot has the biggest following and the most google hits :ninja:

There is more to an electric motor than "the size of the rotor" - number of windings, magnet strength (material density) etc. I would be willing to bet that there are fuel pumps around that are physically bigger than the walbro (as it is pretty damn small) with lesser flow capabilities. Even the stock R33 GTS25t pump is noticeably bigger.

But how likely are you to find a setup that is smaller and higher flowing? I'm imagining the windings of a 1000hp Paxton and it looks comparatively 45% larger for its higher flow (044 being 550-600hp'ish)

Edited by GeeTR
Thats right, your engineering logic has no place here. This is import tuning, you fit wot has the biggest following and the most google hits :(

But how likely are you to find a setup that is smaller and higher flowing? I'm imagining the windings of a 1000hp Paxton and it looks comparatively 45% larger for its higher flow (044 being 550-600hp'ish)

Well i gave an example, the stock R33 GTS pump is noticeably bigger than the higher flowing walbro GSS342. Having worked at repco and seen a lot of the fuel pumps they retail for everyday cars, i have to say that a large number are about the same or slightly bigger than the walbro (and flow less - generalising here and not considering pressures - because NA falcodores and corollas don't need the flow).

I'm sure Bosch could condense their pumps into smaller packaging if they tried, with the possibility of using electromagnets etc but that's a line of thinking i'm sure noone cares about :ninja: it would also hike up cost..

Edited by govich

After watching this thread for a lil bit I had just bought a walbro pump due to the signifigant saving, but my pride and joy is not worth risking on a maxed out fuel pump so im getting a Tomei pump instead, Will this outflow 555cc injectors @ 250rwkw?

After watching this thread for a lil bit I had just bought a walbro pump due to the signifigant saving, but my pride and joy is not worth risking on a maxed out fuel pump so im getting a Tomei pump instead, Will this outflow 555cc injectors @ 250rwkw?

550 injectors will be at approx 60% duty at 250 kws running a decent pump.

Hi all , I was at EvoM net yesterday and I noticed that David Burshur has come up with a twin drop in tank pump assembly for the Lancer Evo rev heads . I'm not 100% sure but the way he talks it sounds like his Burshur Racing has found a way to get more from those Walbro 255 pumps in turbo apps .

Do those Walbro pumps have some internal high pressure relief valve by any chance ? I suppose if they did and BR found a way to cork it it may be the cheapie option for a new pump or pumps .

Also BTW their assembly includes a spiffy right angled bulkhead fitting to get the second pumps seperate wiring through the assemblys steel lid . I'd be interested to know what it is because with that it would be easy to run a secondary pump in a Skyline . Also the system has a "Y" piece above the two pumps outlet feeding a single outlet . What they do is wire relays to bring the second pump online in times of high demand . The downside is what if the wiring/relay failed and the secondaryt didn't start ? Bang ?

I'll see Iif I can find the pic , cheers A .

After a bit of searching I found a couple of links to interesting pump stuff . Hope they work - links .

Firstly under this heading - What your Evo needsfor a fuel system, facts .

http://wwwforums.evolutionm.net/showthread.php?t=245064

Fuel Pump Upgrade Guide

http://mkiv.com/techarticles/fuel_pumps_test_2/index.html

Chinese Copies on E Bay .

http://www.fuel-pumps.net/walbro-forgeries.html

If these links don't work could someone more computer literate than me please help out .

Interesting reads , cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...