Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Depends what u need it for? If u are on a budget i'd say R31 - coz it sounds like ur gonna go the way of the Skyline in the future. Plus parts and availability for these cars will be plentiful considering they were locally sold.

Both Civic and Corolla are good options 2 (modification friendly like the old skool Skyzerr). More petrol efficient if u want 2 to save a bit of money.

Ive been looking for a car for a while as mine is SH!T. anyway in a recent zoom magazine (No. 53) they have an article on the best performance buys for under $10,000. Here it is:

1989-91 MX6 Turbo

1987-88 VL Turbo

1987-89 MR2 AW11

1989-89 R31 GTS/Passage

1986-89 Commodore VN-VP V8

1978-85 RX7 Series 1-3

1989-98 Swift GTi

1987-94 205 GTi

1987-90 Laser TX3 4WD Turbo

1982-87 Starion JB-JD

for more info on then cars just ask cause there other stuff like power, torque, weight, kg,kW, 0-100 and 400M. also theres insurance prices which are helpfull

You need to work out what you want from the car. Do you want space? Is performance important? How many doors? What sort of transmission? Can you afford to keep it going? etc

Wagon, sedan, hatch, 4WD?

Remember running costs...

Aus cars and older Jap cars are cheap to service. 4cyls are better on petrol than 8cyls. Rotaries can be quite thirsty.

Corollas are great. They are cheap to buy and run. Sure - most are FWD, but they are still quite zippy. Alternatively, you could get an Aus delivered Sprinter (AE85 RWD) and as you save up, swap the engine for a 4AGE or 4AGZE. This way you can learn how a RWD car handles without having too much power to start.

Euros are very expensive to maintain. Older turbos may need expensive work soon. The more complex the car is - the more expensive it is to fix.

For under $10k I'd look at a Japanese 4cyl. Mazda 323, Ford Laser, Toyota Corolla, Mitsubishi Lancer. Cheap, fun and reasonable to maintain.

Just my 2c

Oh - if you want a 4WD, Ladas aren't as bad as people make out :)

This may sound antinissan but if you go to the tradingpost auto trader website there is a Toyota sprinter for sale for 5K. I think the person has swapped the 4AC engine with a rebuilt 4-AGE rebuilt version. sounds really nice, cheaper than an import version and it already has suspension and wheels I think. you could do that up a bit with cams and stuff.

Guest Dark Sky 33

Xeaon

full member

Registered: Oct 2002

Location:

Car:

Im also 17soon and will be getting my P's. Im looking at getting a non-turbo skyline. GTS4 R33 infact. Or GTS R32. Are non-turbo skylines really that bad? And would insurance be much cheaper than a turbo'ed skyline. If anyone who is 17,18 with has a non-turbo skyline let me know roughly how much their insurance cost that would be great. Thanks.

Yeah, im 18 and bought a n/a skyline dude, i looked all around for insurance as a turbo....and nobody will insure a turbo at my age, even as a second driver in my old mans name, they wont touch me. Im paying $700 p.a insurance for my 94 n/a......thats with agreed value of 17k, bodykit, rims ect ect,

Adam

Guest gtst88

just get a simple car to learn the basic and fundamentals of driving ..

i got a damn 1.8 twin cam lancer coupe(in my country) when i first got my driving license ..

sweeet though .. even though it didnt have much power .. its a good car to learn te basics ..

cheers dude !

good luck in getting your Ps ..

Guest Dark Sky 33

Xeaon,

The insurance is under HBF, in my fathers name.....the excess is $900 buks......very nice for a first car, this is my second car, my first car was a beetle :(..go the herby's, just dont hit anything, i never made any damage in my first car.....if your a responsible driver then u should be ok, its the irresponsible pricks who run into you without insurance themselves...just watch out for them

Originally posted by holdens_r_better

Is the mitsubishi lancer a good car sounds cheap to run and i like the evo body kits you can get

ahaha plz dont get a lancer. Umm is import still an opinion cuz u can import S13 for around 5K -> 10k

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...