Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have just removed the driver side rotor/hub. i know a little about shoes. but a little is all i know. i noticed that the right side shoe is missing a screw and spring to hold it in place. i found the spring but not the screw. can i buy the springs separatly or will i have to shell out for a whole new kit? the pic where my finger is pointing at the hole is where the spring and screw should be. the shoe just wobbles everywhere without it.

also can i adjust the shoes out a little more, by using what looks to be the adjuster? its at the very bottom! you cant see it in the pics though.

and is there enough meat left on them?

if you want me to take a few more pics of them then i can :thumbsup:

Craig.

for r33gtst

115.jpg

113.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/205221-handbrake-brake-shoes/
Share on other sites

i see what your saying. and yes i am getting into drifting. uras are not cheap either. i read they are $212 a set. i might just buy a brand new set of OEM ones.

i noticed that all of the brand new shoe kits dont come with the springs to afix them. i have to use the old parts. which leads me to beleive that all springs and screw components can be bought separatly.

they do look pretty though

post-9092-1156868680.jpg

yeah they work 1000% better than oem.... its the main reason the japs dont use hydraulic handbrakes... the uras and kazama shoes are the best solution. when you consider the cost of a hydraulic handbrake and a set of shoes that do the same job.... they start to look very cheap :yes:

im sure they do.

your options are:-

* nissan genuine

* Going to a clutch and brake specialist and give them your shoes to bond new pads onto them. if u do this ask them if they can re-bond them with performance pads in mind.

* i should think that they are out there aftermarket for r34 i cant see why not. id imagine that they could be the same as the r33. look arround. throw URAS a pm.

im putting mine back in today. should be fun :huh: as ive never done it before.

URAS,

how do the uras ones compare to project mu?

and whats the price for a set for r33?

The old yelloe type were the same material as the Project MU, but the new black URAS shoes are 10 times better. The new material was developed in D1GP by guys using upwards of 275 section semi slick tyres. Not to be confuse this with a sales speil but we offer money back garantee on all our pads/shoes we are that confident in them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...