Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

congrats nick.

doesn't it make a huge difference with the PFC tuned. so much low and mid-range power that is unlocked which transforms the car.

Thanks Andrew.

Yeah, it does! There's a little bit more lag, but that's to be expected with the longer piping of the FMIC kit... But once it's on boost, it pulls harder and feels heaps less held-back doing so!

I don't know if it's the new muffler (which makes the car a LOT quieter but still sounds nice), the new front pipe/dump, the new cat, the tune with the PFC in place, or a combination of the the whole lot working together, but it feels a lot smoother both at idle and through the rev range - there *seems* to be less vibration in the car overall...

Dyno sheet:

StageaDynorun16082008.jpg

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what boost control are you using (sorry if you already posted it) and how many psi were those runs at?

No boost controller, Andrew. I might get a Profec B sII later on, haven't decided yet.

I haven't had a chance to take it for a proper drive since I got it back on Saturday (in fact, it hasn't moved) because I've been a bit sick, but for the brief moments that I checked the gauge while I was driving, it read around 0.7bar, I think. I did a peak recall but can't remember what it read. When I take it for a good run I'll do a recording of the boost curve to see if it is constant or rises with the revs (gotta love the Defi's for that functionality!).

No boost controller, Andrew. I might get a Profec B sII later on, haven't decided yet.

I haven't had a chance to take it for a proper drive since I got it back on Saturday (in fact, it hasn't moved) because I've been a bit sick, but for the brief moments that I checked the gauge while I was driving, it read around 0.7bar, I think. I did a peak recall but can't remember what it read. When I take it for a good run I'll do a recording of the boost curve to see if it is constant or rises with the revs (gotta love the Defi's for that functionality!).

i have a turbosmart bleedvalve that came off my R33 if you want it. it'll cost you the time to pick it up.

or I can sell you my dual stage ebc (Hybrid brand) that holds boost fine for stock turbos, 12psi

no good for 1bar tho

cost me 270, plus install, can sell for a hundred I reckon

getting the profecB spec2 myself, to hold 1bar steady

No thanks guys, I think I'll eventually be going for a GReddy Profec-B spec II as well, as I hear nothing but good things about them.

Oh, I haven't yet done a "recording" of the boost curve up the rev range, but when I checked the peak boost last night after going for a drive, it's hitting right on 0.8bar (which is 11.76psi according to my calcs).

I've also noticed that it takes a lot longer for the turbo to cool down after a drive, so this leads me to two theories:

1. I'll have to check against the old standard dump pipe, but for now I'm assuming that the temp sensor has been placed in the same spot, and if it IS in the same spot; then

2. it looks like the turbo is now approaching that zone where the extra boost is no longer efficiently adding to power, and is now just added heat.

I agree with not going past the 12psi, however a good boost controller may bring that 12psi on harder and sooner which is what I have found testing witht he boost controller on and off.

I use a Blitz ID-3 and have on two different motors (one being twin turbo) and have found it to be fantastic on both applications.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hmmm, fuelled up for the first time today after having the PFC (and other bits) installed, and my fuel economy seems to have improved at least a little.

I'll be going to Canberra in a week or two, so I'll see how the highway economy is and report back.

Alright peoples, I did a recording on the Defi's to see where my boost was sitting at, and as I mentioned it hit a peak of 0.85bar, which works out to 12.3psi, BUT that was only a spike lasting less than half a second.

When I watched the boost curve, it goes up and levels out at around 0.7bar, which is just a nudge over 10psi. Probably in a couple of months I'll get a boost controller, but I'll be going straight for a GReddy Profec B spec II, as I've heard nothing but good things about them.

the profecB are good units.

nevertheless if you want this bleedvalve is sitting here (for free) if you want it nick. maybe it bring it on quicker and hold a little better or maybe not?!?

Edited by wolverine
the profecB are good units.

nevertheless if you want this bleedvalve is sitting here (for free) if you want it nick. bring it on quicker and hold a little better.............

+1.

  • 3 months later...
so.... early series 1

engine harness : 09/96 - 08/97 24011-0V100

ECU : 23740-0V300

And a manual gear box

Would the R34 GTT Power FC work?? (Plug & Play)

or does the loom still need to be modified to make it work??

Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a plug-and-play PFC for the Stagea (unless you own a 260RS, in which case the R32 or R33 GT-R PFC will work). The Stagea is the only RB25DET-powered Nissan that also has AWD, so a few "tweaks" need to be done to get it working. Do a search for the "secret squirrel tweak" here in the Stagea section...

A manual gearbox is a priority, but as Duncan mentioned, Mark @ Hills Motorsports is looking for someone with an auto so he can trial running the PFC with the ECU for the auto, and see if he can get them co-operating.

  • 2 weeks later...

So the "secret squirrel tweak" is the only mod you need to to the loom!!

like Duncan said to me in a PM " since your's is already manual I think you'd be mad not to go a full computer like PFC."

i was talking to Trent at Status Tuning and was telling me to remap the ECU and go from there (E-manage, Safc...), then searching more on this forum about remapping the S1 stagea, only to find out that the S1 can't do real time?(Tangles Post)

not many tuners in melb. that have worked on the S1 and Power FC!

Remap fit and tune $750

+

E-manage fit and tune $1000+

Power FC and Mod, tune $2000

i just hope thats the only mod we'll need to do!

if the plug/loom is the same as an R33 then there should be no other modifications required for an R33 GTS-t PowerFC.

if the plug and loom is the same as the R34 then you will need to modify the loom to fit an R34 Gt-t PowerFC.

the tweak relates to the R34 GT-t having traction control and the stageas NOT having traction control (with the exception of some RWD versions). the R34 GT-t PowerFC requires a certain voltage to pin 51 or it lights the engine check light.

you need to find out which plug you have as that will determine the outcome. if a workshop has both R33 and R34 PowerFC's handy then that makes it easy.

Edited by wolverine

the stagea runs the r34 plug even is series 1 motor (same as series 2 r33 skyline). Depending on the computer part numbers as posted above there are somewhere between a couple and heaps of changes required to the wiring.

Mine was running the car really well except for Air Con which was not working yet (needs a relay added as stagea uses a negative/earth signal while the r34 uses a positive signal). The motor is currently out to have an rb30 bottom end bolted on the head so it should all turn out to be a good combo

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...