Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey i hav a 93 s1 r33 current mods are: ase FMIC, hks 3.5" cat bak zorst, walbro 500hp fp, pod, standard turbo as far as im aware, running @ 11psi and standard ecu. My car made a healthy 221.1rwkw on the dyno at turbo tune. After speaking to a few ppl they think that its immpossible to make that sort of power with the standard turbo. The only thing i could think of is mayb my turbo is hi-flowed?? coz its def not bigger than the standard t3 :( just wanted to kno ppls thoughts on this and if any1 has a similar setup getting similar kw's??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206339-is-this-possible/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

it is possible.

A lot of people cant see how my car has made 180 odd on stock 8 psi (RB25 S2 turbo) with stock ecu, but it has done so on more than one occasion.

there's lot's of variables to consider, Healthy as engine, happy dyno (Read: dyno producing higher numbers, although not saying this is the case), possible highflow, dyno room temps, tuning, or simply a freak engine.

At the end of the day though, a dyno is a tuning tool, and nothing more. Dyno figures are nothing more than bragging rights, so be happy with the dyno sheets saying 221KW's and tell everyone to shut the f**k up.

Edited by R31 drift pig

bish33,

Bring it down to the dyno day on the 8th of march and see how it compared to others on the day.

Typically on the boostworx dyno r33's with similiar mods pull 190-200rwkw. With an adj. exh. cam gear around 210.

Even playing field; same dyno operator, same strapping down technique, same dyno. :yes:

Did you get a copy of the dyno sheet?

Scan it and put it up here.

I've been told that if they set up the temp, pressure etc incorrectly then you can get high figures (sounds like this is the case with yours)

Drift Pig is correct that dynos are really for tuning not true figures, but if callabrated they should be close to the mark.

I have many more mods and only make 30 extra rwkw, perhaps your ecu has been modified, or you have a high flow, but if not I doubt the 221rwkw figure is accurate.

My R32GTR made 199rwkw in nearly stock form with after market muffler , pod filters and a chiped ecu, so my thought's are that it is not an accurate dyno figure.

My old seies 2 R33gts25t made 135rwkw with only a muffler on it. Mark at Tillbrooks said that that was a perfect reading for a stock motor. (should be about 185kws at the motor)

Just my thought's anyway.

Hope it helps answer your question.

30rwkw doesn't sound like a lot but factor in the auto + your mid range would rip his to pieces making the acceleration difference look more like 50-60rwkw. :yes:

I agree, but the reading sounds way too high for a stock motor.

Either there are more mods than stated or the dyno is high.

I dont believe in the "freak engine" theory as its way outside a blueprinted (all specs are spot on) range of performance. (and i assume this isnt a recently rebuilt motor)

bish33.

What afr's is it running up around peak power?

My bets the afr's are spot on or a tad lean. Which indicates with a stock ecu the fuel pump is on its last legs.

Give it 6months it will continue to lean out more so and we will hear of how your rebuilding the motor due to broken ring lands. :S

Post the dyno sheet with afr's so we can see what state of tune it is in.

it is possible.

how?

ive never seen 200+ out of a stock r33 ecu?

they cant be remapped like the r32 ect. thats why most people go safc or pfc.

this is the point im trying to make, maybe i should have been clearer.

how?

ive never seen 200+ out of a stock r33 ecu?

they cant be remapped like the r32 ect. thats why most people go safc or pfc.

this is the point im trying to make, maybe i should have been clearer.

Wasnt saying anything about the ecu's themselves, moreso that a setup like that can produce numbers like that. Ive seen it. My engine makes 180 on 8 psi and stock ecu. Most need a remap and more boost to achieve that. Admittedly that was running a tad lean, but not dangerous. Even though it was a tad lean, still makes more power than it really should. My engine also has SFA km's on it, and was also out of an auto front cut. Some setups will make more power than others, fact of life. Not every setup is the same.

And they CAN be remapped. Utter B.S that that they cant. Although the cost of it is almost triple a standard remap, hence why everyone goes PFC/SAFC etc, But when a R33 ECU is remapped it's better than a PFC (Knock Control etc)

(Ben Awaits SimonR32 to come a-running and say the same :) )

At the end of the Day, who Give a shit? A tuner can make my 180 odd kw RB20 read 400KW's at the wheels If I so asked him to.

Bish 33

We cant tell you much at all without a dyno sheet, and if you REALLY want to know the answer, take your car to someone like Boostworx, Turbo Tune or ATS, and get them to look at the turbo and have your question answered once and for all.

Edited by R31 drift pig

yeah i think i said the exact same thing in another thread somewhere... once the 33 ecu is remapped, its a better ecu then a Power FC thats for sure.. however most go the PFC for ease of use and more tuners.

Theres a few ppl doing 33 remaps now... but for me, the 20 ecu + a RPM switch works a treat (i havent hooked up an rpm switch yet but its possible to do so that you can retain the VCT)

As for the original poster... while nothing is impossible.. its highly unlikely the stock ecu will allow you to run anything more then 10 psi without some form of rich and retard, and there fore limiting the power output. So this suggest that you may well have a SAFC hidden away uunder the dash, or possible a japanese remapped/chipped 33 ecu... i'd pull the kick panel off and look at the loom for spliced wires and have a look at the ecu and see if theres anything non standard about it.

the stock turbos do however make good power. as mentioned mine made 220 rwkw on 13 psi, with a remapped 20 ecu, no VCT and bulk torque and responce.. i was really happy with it

post-43484-1203210660_thumb.jpg

My fuel pump is only 3months old so i cant see how its leaning out, turbo tune hav done all my work i hav had my car tuned 3 times in the last 3 months so im sure if it was leaning out they would hav told me coz thats why a got a new fp in the 1st place my car was gettin .8 of litre at idle wen its meant to get 3Ls. The dyno was not on shoot out mode and he did put all the right factors in the comp b4 running my car on the dyno i do not believe this was an incorrect readout, as i do not kno much about the history of my car mayb it has more mods that i am unware of, and a way to find out would be to pull my engine down i wont be doin that lol.And i would be happy to take it to the dyno day, curious to see wat it gets on a different dyno :)

Edited by bish33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...