Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so nearly a month after al my problems started im suspecting my CAS is faulty.

the symptoms are:

missing sometimes (not always) after 4000rpm

missing on idle (quite bad sometimes)

stalled once going from reverse to drive (auto)

knocking when under load (not always)

gave error for CAS when obd was checked

have done all the usual checks:

changed plugs

checked coils

afm etc

the guys that have been looking into my probs are a very reputable workshop..they suspected the sitc I had installed was causing the error code and misfire possibly so that was disconnected but its still missing and now knocking also..im taking it back 2day to see if the error code is back.

but in the mean time..by the sounds of the symptoms could the CAS be a real possibility?

anyone else who's had one die/ be faulty have any similar problems?

I've spent a lot of money trying to find the problem and I don't want to jump into buying a new cas from nissan unless im pretty sure that's the fix. they want 700 for one..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/206527-faulty-cam-angle-sensor/
Share on other sites

I had all the same problems with my Rb30e after rebuilding it. I managed to fit the IACC plug onto INJ1 (only plugs that will go back together wrong!!). Did weird things like that, although it didnt miss at higher rpm usually (coilpacks?)

quickest and easiest way is to goto wreckers/mates and offer them $10 to borrow one for 30mins to check.

CAS usually work or don't or they cause the car to cut out once they get hot and the car will not start until it cools down again. Your problem sounds more like an ignition module fault to me. If it is the CAS, its a strange problem, if it had a miss all the time, it may have bearing dust blocking some of the optical slots on the disc inside it, but it would have the problem all the time typically.

Thats actually the ignition module that cuts out when it gets hot. Exactly, CAS operation can be very intermittant, especially in crap copys (anything non ACA).

Mighty big dust particles to block up those holes :/ I think its more to do with dust sitting all over the optical lens of the laser.

You could try putting a cas kit through it. Apparently people have problems with the bearing underneath in Rb30de dizzys. They get old and dry and tend to eject fine dust particles throughout, eventually interfering with the lasers ability to count the pickups on the optical disc

you need to get it to play up at idle preferably and unplug each injector until you find a cylinder not firing/injecting. (you need to listen for a decrease and increase in rpm as you pull and reconnect the plug to tell if that cylinder is operating)

easier to pull injector then the coil pack off on these engines. (no dissy leads)

if you can isolate it to a single cylinder, it's more then likely the coil, as they have a built in ignitor in r34 models i believe.

if every cylinder is doing something, but it still runs rough, go for the cas.

the problem will be getting it to play up when you want to test it.

edit: of course if you were in a workshop you could use the scope to check the integrity of the pattern on the cas signal lines and also ignition.

Edited by RB30-POWER
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...