Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cheers for the advice

just looking at the dyno plot, the torque curve drops off at 4100 rpm

where as the manifold pressure doesnt riset above boost pressure till 5000rpm

how do you explain the torque dropping off before the pressure (restriction) rises in the manifold.

Im not trying to discount anyones theories - i welcome them.

But i would like to be certain before spending anymore time and money on this bloody car.

cheers rob

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the way im looking at it

everythings looking good up until 3750rpm.

at around 3750rpm your gate starts to open.

by 4000rpm its fully open and the interference with the ehaust turbine starts to cause turbulance in the housing. this contnues to build.

by 5000rpm the exhaust wheel has lost a tonne of speed as the gasses are trying to split between the gate exit and going out thru the wheel

due to the turbine slowing down the manifold pressure starts to rise higher and higher.

which only compounds the problem and hence why your torque dies in the ass.

not sure what a non gated rear housing is worth but i would assume not a lot.

and getting your manifold builder to install the gate into the manifold would be a simple procedure.

lowering your exhaust manifold pressure is a must and you have the dyno sheet proving its out of control.

so switching housings is the only way you will fix your issue.

  • 3 weeks later...
we now run the wastegate from the turbine housing where possible. I understand you feel its dodgy, I think the exact opposite, I'd PREFER to run it off the turbine, and do so on my own car, everyone of my friends cars, and any customer that will listen and let me do it. You have better boost control, more hp, faster spool,

6BOOST

Just a quick update, finally got the ecu back with the starting problem patched up (some interference/noise from the idle controller so the dealer just turned it off)

Anyway run it up on the dyno again checking the timing manually found it to be drifting around 10 deg or more under load. Called the dealer to check all settings ie sync falling edges etc. Could not get it stable.

Quickly tried a untuned motec - dead stable.

So ecu is back with dealer.

Has anyone had problems with these TF electronics plug in autronic ecus before ???

Cheers

rob

Imo, the 2nd manifold looks good + iv seen too many spastic 9sec street VL's running that style of gate take off to remember, to think its that. Many ppl swear by that style.

10deg variance under load? that surely could be your issue. Thats a fantastically huge fail from a piece of Autronic hardware. Many a car would go bang with an extra 10deg thrown in at redline and wot.

I blew a wad over your dump / exhuast setup btw man, looks fantastic, love the gentle flare off the back :P

  • 2 weeks later...

dude, that hole is the size of the waste gate on mine....lol

also noted your CAS is almost cranked right around to fully retarded....recheck your base timing.. .

and if that head is the R33 vvt head you might want to ensure the vvl is working aswell as the rb30 blocks dont cater for the

extra oil gallery..

Edited by nizmonut
  • 1 month later...
How recent is the Autronic? The earlier ones had big issues with the standard CAS and required a change in the internals to give clean trigger signals.

Cheers

Gary

Ahh, version 1.07 from memory, yes it required a change of the trigger disk. (recent versions do not)

Ive finally got a bit more power but its still not all there. :miner:

Ill run through when has happened since last post.

1. Dealer changed some settings and ignition modifiers to stabilise spark timing (on different car as we are not in the same city)

2. Spark timing on my car STILL changing with revs, so took car to dealer and after 3/4 of day found the problem to be the spline in the cam that drives the CAS was missaligned causing a nasty vibration. Aligned as best we could but still a 2 deg shift at 3000-3500rpm.

3. Fixed a few issues - seated injectors 4mm deeper, sealed a hairline crack in the inlet manifold that was causing crap idle, replaced dead alternator.

4. The big one, checked the cam timing again with degree wheel and found in and ex to be 7 deg out. Retuned (road) with correct cam timing and got another 15% duty cycle, now up to 65% on denso 720cc injectors at 21psi. Therefore approx power 280 - 300kw.

The exhaust manifold backpressure is still 2 to 1. ie over 40psi which i really need to sort out.

Next plan is to try another turbo wastegate setup - as soon as i can find a donor...

Unfortunately speedo drive has sheared off and gone through the gear box so ill have to sort that first. Choice.

Ill let u kno how i get on, any ideas on the backpressure would be great.

cheers

rob

Edited by roba
  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
×
×
  • Create New...