Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ps.....from memory you have previously placed much emphasis on that variance being due to water temps between the front and rear of the head, but now its the plenum ???

Edited by ISL33P

haha yeah, if I was doing it for a buisness and for a reputation, I would also flow test mine to prove, but I have no one to prove my results to, its a stinking RB20, it if blows because of my dodgy plenum, then so be it, I will build or replace the engine for next to nothing and try a different style of plenum.

Have you considered the Hermholtz reasonance theory when designing your manifold - here's an overview plucked from a US thread in relation to the sr20.

Long runners make more "midrange" as Def says, "focused powerband" because of:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz_resonance

This is the key here. The long runners make more airflow available to each cylinder... but ONLY During a very specific, narrow, RPM Range... depending on the size and shape of the runners. the SR20 intake runners get a mid-range bump in the 4500-5500 RPM range.. and thats about it... Anything ABOVE or UNDER that RPM range will suffer, because hermholtz also works backwards, subtracting available airflow from each cylinder, anytime its not in its peak operating range. So VE will ramp up quickly just into boost coming out of the 3000-3500RPM range, right in peak VE range thanks to hermholtz resonance theory (4500-5500RPM) at which point the vehicle has gained more and more acceleration due to this design, but as you pass 6000RPM hermholtz ruins your top end VE... killing torque.. and thus power... but the SR20's stock turbo starts running on the bleeding edge after that spot anyways... so VE is dropping but so is flow through the turbine and compressor... the turbo has to flow less now because it moves less air through the motor at the same boost, because of hermholtz, this complements the stock turbo perfectly since by lowering its flow at high RPMS it can level off without overworking itself. so the drop in torque is barelly noted on the stock setup (after hermholtz is removed, at high RPMS), but the loss of the long runner intake IS noted because of the huge dip in mid-range you lose by not having hermholtz there anymore.

This is what our thread op has experienced. And as mentioned, cams are a huge factor here. They allow the motor to breath after hermholtz has been removed, taking advantage of a shorter runner intake manifold, the way the stock one cannot do, at all. Sure you can slap on a bigger turbo and bigger cams and keep the stock intake... but its a huge waste, you will be fighting hermholtz right when your large(er) than stock turbo comes on boost... this is why we change the stock intake. it isnt about volume or flow (although those help) its about getting rid of the hermholtz problem when it becomes a problem. It also depends on application, a longer runner intake may help the turbo get moving, as VE is punched right when it comes on boost briefly (obviously depending on the size of the turbo) so the car feels like it responds quicker... and it does... but overall power is lacking compared to others with the same setup because you are always going to feel that drop in torque after hermholtz starts robbing you, no matter how big your cams or turbo is.

sydney kid you do realise were talking about a plenum for an RB20 ?

there are no "cheap" aftermarket plenums for RB20's budget at least $1000 for an off the shelf replacement

theres only the somewhat suspect , throttle to the front of the stock plenum.

i brought mine off SAU for $400, was a private sale. joe il send you some pics when i get the chance.

i only skipped though the most recent posts so i could be wrong here but.... dont swap the 20 for the 25. 20's are tough as.

dont know if you boys have seen this it was in the Fabrication http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...t191089.htmlbut

But yeah thats is has been helping me make my plenum

Thanks Matt,

Yeah I have had a good read though that one already, I will be using some of the information from there for sure. Mine is going to be a little more basic though.

Joe.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...