Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ladies, Gents and everything inbetween, I would like to send you all an invitation to check out the new FangArtists website and public forums.

The FangArtists are looking for some fresh new talant to join the ranks.

To become a FangArtist forum member (not an official FangArtist), visit www.fangartists.com and click on the forum link. As usual, you will be required to create a user account. You will have access to the General, Sales and FangMobiles section.

If the powers that be deem you to be Fangworthy, you will be invited to join the FAs at a meet which essentially involves chatting about cars, hobbies and other mindless crap. Occasionally, we will go for a cruise to various spots.

We hope to see you online soon.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/20961-fangartistscom-is-open-for-business/
Share on other sites

I give up!

I also tried resetting my password even though I know its correct and this is the latest error I get

Sorry, but your password cannot be retrieved because your account is currently inactive. Please contact the forum administrator for more information

SLYWPN, I guess in order to be a fully fledged FA, it is a case of both who you are. what your like, your attitude to life, cars and others and also your car.

We don't want the FAs to become like some other forums/clubs out there who let everybody cruise with them in their 1982 Honda Civic with a top speed of 105kms and takes 60secs to get there if you catch my drift...

The FAs are all good friends who catch up with each other and hang out, see movies and happen go on cruises occasionally :P

Not all our cars are 10sec beasts with monster turbos. Since I've become a FA, I've seen an assortment of 180sxs, S15s, LS1s, R32, R33 and R34 Skylines (GTR or otherwise), rotaries, GTOs, and many other cars so it doesn't really matter if you don't have the fastest car on Earth.

If you're a nice person and the Powers That Be think you can keep up in a safe manner, you will be invited on a cruise and tested. I, myself do not make that decision alone.

nismoR34, I'm on it mate, I'll get someone to look into it.

Cheers,

Dave.

lol.. so is there an initialisation ceremony? :P does it involve eating rubber?

hehe, sounds fun .. can understand the need for more closed clubs where everybody knows everybody.. too many clubs are a bit too open in their policy (which is fine for some clubs) and that can result in the wrong environment i guess.

i looked out the website.. some nice flash there but some funnies with navigation in some sections. Some of the Flash can be a bit hard to read with all the text though (the specs, etc) - just some feedback. Rest overall pretty nice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...