Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a theory that boost pressure is probably relative to turbocharger life in an exponential relationship.

Obviously this belief would allow for some turbos surviving on 12psi, some not, some surviving on 14psi+ and some not.

Basically, your turbo will last for X amount of time running 7/8 psi (ie stock boost). X is unknown obviously, but we can safely assume that X probably represents quite a long time, maybe 10 years?

At say 10 psi, you might find your turbo will now only last for X/2. But if your turbo is going to last for 10 years at 7/8 psi, its still going to last for another 5 at 10psi. So still a long time.

At 12psi, you might then find that turbo life has shortened to X/4, in other words, 2.5 years. Starting to shorten now.

Bump boost up to 14psi and you may find turbo life reduces further to X/8, or just over a year before failure.

16psi, a bit over 6 months... you get the picture.

If this theory of mine is correct, it obviously allows for other factors influencing the unknown X value. Newer car (and therefore newer turbo), better maintained, better condition turbos might have an initial X value far higher than a car that has been neglected, has already been run at a higher boost, is older, etc etc.

The problem is with imports, you never really can expect to know the *exact* and entire history of the car, and even still you are only making an educated guess as to the turbos lifespan.

I personally run mine at 10psi. I do not believe that this will severly limit the lifespan of the turbo.

12psi would be reasonably safe too in my opinion. There becomes a real risk of failure, but in most cases an acceptable one.

If your turbocharger *is* in good condition, I dont think there would be any reason for premature failure, as the turbo is still operating efficiently (and so temperatures are under control)

At 14psi, things become more iffy. Basically it becomes much more luck oriented. I know of people personally who have run 14psi on an RB25 with no problem. I also have read of plenty who have had failure at this level.

To run 14psi you need to be willing and able to replace your turbo as there is a significant level of risk of failure at this stage, due to higher shaft speed and increased temperatures.

Anything above 14psi in my opinion is pretty stupid. You would not do this without being very much ready to replace your turbo, in which case you might as well just go ahead with replacing it and sell the stock one to recover some cost?

A few hundered $$ off the cost of the replacement is stupid to throw away for nothing more than running above 14psi simply for the sake of it?

Obviously this all may or may not be correct, its just an educated estimation of how things could likely work that Ive come to by observation.

Biggest problem is that its still a bit of a dark art once boost pressures are raised.

We know 100% is that there is NO magic number.

We know 100% that turbo life is reduced at some level as boost pressures rise

Its then just a case of making an informed decision and trying out a number for yourself and hoping its not one that is too high for your turbo to handle :D

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 months later...

High exhaust temp also hurts turbos. So leaner a/F ratios or excessively retarded ignition would cause turbo failure, more so at high boost.

There's more than one way to kill yourself and more than one way to kill a turbo. Combinations just increase the risk.

Running 14psi and a lean A/F ratio is like being a basejumper who loves to carry knives in his parachute bag. Sure someone always knows somebody who has done it since he was a kid, but we are all waiting to see the "freak accident" on Today Tonight.

well i just put in a ebc and my low boost is on 6 and high on 14 on a stock turbo r34gtt its been like that for 5 months now and no problems (YET)

Why would u put low setting at 6psi when its standard at 7psi?

Depends on tune and most times alot of luck. Ran my std 34gtt turbo at 12 for a yr then got bored and uped it to 14.7 and that lasted a yr b4 it went bang but i was prepared to buy a new one. Somewhere round the 12 mark seems about right b4 putting more stress on the shaft.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...