Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

who is this toshi guy?

does he have a workshop/website or does he work from home??

http://grapevine.com.au/~marzenna/

He's on the forum, just PM him (his name is Toshi on the forum as well). No workshop, but he has a wideband sensor and knock microphone....

^ hahah that rhymes.

Yea i thought that website mrkotter posted up didnt look familiar at all..

Plus the site looks old too..

Toshi, im going to get my car on the dyno tomorrow!!

I will send you a pm with my dyno figures..

If anyone else has any questions feel free to ask..

yes..

another think i'm abit worry..

how fast do u have to drive ur car for the tuning? are there any cops around? cause i don't wanna drive like 80/90kms in the 40 zone (don't have many points left lol). did u do it on the back road or highway..

i'm gonna get mine done next week.

cheers

Ford

I drove on the highway which is a 80 zone.

Few times you take it to redline in 2nd gear.. But you drive normally testing out each gear!!

Like 5th gear up the hill going at 80..

Once initial map is done and tuned, then you go to the freeway which is a 110 zone and test out third gear to nearly redline.

I did mine over double demerits, so you should be fine lol..

But yea be careful of cops..

Edited by siddr20

hahah thanks drew!!

I know you recommened me this about an year ago!! lol

Well i was leaning towards the power fc and i did end up buying it.. But far out it costs soo much to tune and the power fc itself..

I saved myself 1.5k and the remap does the same thing (for stage 1 type mods anyways)

Edited by siddr20

he can remap with bigger turbos, but i guess power fc will be more effective to fine tune things..

But im not gonna go past stage1..

I was power hungry, but im planning to go europe end of year once uni is finally over!! So will need money for that lol

Then next year, start working full-time and save up for a better car plus house :thumbsup:

Well got it on the dyno today..

196.2kw at 10psi

Theres something wrong with my 22dollar bleed valve lol..

I remember at the remap i was trying to increase it, but the guage just wouldnt go past 0.7 bar.

But the car felt a lot more powerful, so thought perhaps my 300dollar guage was faulty lol.. or a leak!!

Anyways on the dyno, it still showed boost at 10psi.

I reckon with 12psi it would be easily 200kw plus

But im happy with my results..

Nope :)

Might go back tomorrow and see if they can still print it out for me?

or perhaps do one run for me for free and check it. But they said it seemed fine.

They gave me another graph with Torque figures (Nm) on the side??

At 130kw, it read as 4500 - top peak

NO idea what that means!!

Edited by siddr20

yeh my dyno dynamics printouts read torque in newtons rather then foot/pound. Although maybe its just set that way.

anway it would be interesting to see how flat your afr's are

Looks like theres more left in that top end too

This is sounding like a hell of a good option for me lol... Only problem is I'm in ACT... Might have to organise a trip to Sydney.

How do you think it'd go on a 33 GTST with a front mount, cat back and a planned boost increase to 9-10psi?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...