Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have a Turbodumb bleed valve set at 10lbs and works real good.

I love it.

OK, now it is time for insurance.

Some companies say that any LEGAL mods are fine.

Rang RTA to find out about it.

Top engineer (NSW) says "Any adjustable boost controller is illegal because it changes emissions."

So... Has anyone come across this before?

It will kill me to go back to the stock boost.

Has anyone else looked into this area re insurance etc and is there anything else that they could be able to void our insurance on???

;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21146-legality-of-boost-controllers/
Share on other sites

Boost controllers do change emissions, but you still may be within the legal limits even with increased boost. If you are that worried then book your car in for a test at the RTA.

It's not so much the boost controller itself that is illegal, but the potential increased emissions it creates. I think you should be ok though, a guy here (I forget his name) recently said that he had a gutted cat and it still passed the emissions test.

yep, afaik, if you change any part of the intake or exhaust you are potentially in breach of epa standards thus deeming your car unroadworthy by the RTA & defectable by the police.

finish your mods, get an engineers certificate and live without fear of defect fines.

the EPA i belive give out a plate.

now i'm not 100% sure on this... this is JUST MY understanding (before someone comes along and tell me i'm totally wrong)

Engineers

Like diffs... tailshafts... power upgrades vs brake's etc.etc.

For instance, can the body handle the 400rwkw, has the chassis been strenghened and all that jazz. All the mechanical side of the equation and ADR's. They dont care about EPA i believe.

EPA

That's the EPA bit. is the hitch.

To make a car fully compliant with aftermarket ECU's big turbos/cooler/pod/exhaust noise/extractors etc etc.

Then you have to go through the FULL EPA test, to comply with the ADR's in this area.

Now my understanding is that test is the same as what they put the new cars through.

All sorts of emission testing etc etc.

(this is where it hurts) This test costs approx $2500 and if you fail there is NO refund.

So it's something that's a fair bit of work and you need to have the car running A1.

Now like i said.

This is what i have been told by various people and i've put bits together to come up with the above.

I maybe ill informed, if i am then no doubt someone will correct me :P

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by RedLineGTR

sounds interesting..

u always say something like that :)

Humbla

y do u really care about epa or cops?? *** them both, its your car do what u like with it!! If it was up to the cops and epa we would all be driving around stock 1.5 litre 4 cyclinders which only to a top speed of 100 km/h.

Originally posted by Zombie

Stock R33 runs 7psi after 5k, and something like 5psi before 5k

you sure? i know mine was stock as a rock when i got it and i had it put on a dyno and they hooked up a boost gauge and it got up to an exact 10psi and i know of others 33 that was there on the day with no boost controller got to 10psi too

Originally posted by R31Nismoid

skyl9

did you have and exhaust?

if so then that's the reason. The boost rises to approx 9psi once you do a full 3".

no my car was stock.. part from a hks bov and a k&n flat filter

and the other 33 was stock part from hks bov and a cat back exhaust

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...