Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently I performed some intake temperature tests. They are not dead acurate but are atleast an indication of when heat soak is affecting your engine. I used some digital thremometers from jaycar for the tests.

The car: 1993 R33 GTSt, 3" turbo back exhaust, 8psi (stock) boost, stock intercooler, pod filter with cold air partition (95deg neoprene heat shield).

Ambient temperature: 17degC

1st Test: Cruising at 110km/h

Pod = 15deg

AFM = 15deg

Engine Bay = 35deg

2nd Test: Stuck in traffic (45km/h max.) (heat soak had set in)

Pod = 35deg

AFM = 37deg

Engine Bay = 55deg

3rd Test: On boost hill climb and high speeds

Pod = 14deg

AFM = 12deg

Engine Bay = 33deg

4th Test: Heat Soak

After pulling up at a set of lights from cruising at 110km/h, it took 3 minutes to reach full heat soak as shown in the 2nd test. It took 7 minutes of driving at 110km/h again to fully get rid of it.....

5th Test: After idle for 3 mins

Pod = 40deg

AFM = 43deg

Engine Bay = 60deg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21359-r33-gtst-intake-temperature-tests/
Share on other sites

pod filter with cold air partition (95deg neoprene heat shield).

rb25 - do u have a cold air intake?? e.g. a tube rigged from somewhere front of your car to feed your partition steady supply of cold air? Of course, not much use at idle.

*Very* interesting results, about time somebody got scientific on this :P

Those that take their skyline to the strip should take note. Obviously sitting there idling as you wait to get your run (can be 20mins), gradually moving forward - its just like traffic unfortunately. Even if u regularly turn your engine on and off heat soak is going to set in and its going to effect your times.

A suggestion: Can u at all do plenum temperatures? Obviously you've got some good before intake results, but the most important thing is the actual temps going into your engine..

Interesting results...

Now all u need to do is *borrow* someones carbon fibre bonnet with the vents in it and see how much of a difference it makes (obviously weather and traffic conditions would be hard to keep accurate).

Interesting. The people driving around with pod filters but without partitions should take note of the air temps they are sucking in.

What thermometer model did you use?

I tried to buy thermometers from Jaycar 2 weeks ago to perform similar testing with my own partition (http://www.endusk.com/skyline/caip/caip.html) but the dumbasses couldn't find where in the shop they put them.....

When I get some I will add some notes on the temp differences between using just neoprene and using aluminium + neoprene stuff + sealing rubbers.

I forgot to mention that without a duct forcing air into the partitioned area the heatsoak reduced at 60km/h and above, even in traffic.

predator666: I dont have a duct rigged up to it at the moment. I will do some plenum temps very soon (end of this week/early next week)

Sil8ty: I got the heatshield from Century Foam and Rubber. It's about 8mm thick, sort of like neoprene and has a reflective foil on one side. My partition cost 2 hours of time and 4 dollars.

kjb_r33: I've been informed that the clutch fan on the engine from the factory is excellent in its efficiency and i think that at high engine speeds it pulls alot more fresh air int the engine bay thus making it cooler.

sewid: boxhead has a similar partition (made from metal) and it gets red hot. Metal partitions in my opinion suffer from heat soak and would lengthen the times to get the intake temps down.

I've posted a pic of my setup below. I know its rough, but it seals to the bonnet and the top of the wheel arch and right up to the back of the headlight and it works really well.

Originally posted by rb25

sewid: boxhead has a similar partition (made from metal) and it gets red hot. Metal partitions in my opinion suffer from heat soak and would lengthen the times to get the intake temps down.

I have thought about that as well. Now the aluminium is insulated with foam it gets warm but never hot/red hot/too hot to touch.

To solve the problem of getting the heat out of the aluminium i was thinking of thermal epoxying on some aluminium heatsinks on the cold side.

I dont know if this would worsen the problem of heatsoak however in the long term or increase the effective heatsoak time to beyond average lenght of time spent stopped thereby negating it.... Only way to find out is to experiment.

Or could just remove the headlight and poke the pod out the front :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
    • Yeah very valid point. I am waiting for one of the other tuners to come back from vacation so he can help me a bit when the cat is installed again. In the meantime I am going to finish up my polishing and ceramic coating that I have started myself.    N45 Dr Beasley product is highly recommended for a paint primer / polisher. Using this EXO Gtechniq also for the ceramic but next time might use the light serum before hand also. Looks great. 
×
×
  • Create New...