Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

CarAdvice's review on Manuel XR6 Turbo, new Launch Control feature

In the XR range the real treat comes with the XR6 Turbo with the revised six-speed manual gearbox. You’ve just got to try the launch control – we did and it is manic.

Pop the car into 1st gear, floor the throttle and it will lock the revs onto 3500rpm, then dump the clutch and hang one!!

A better shot of the interior 2008fordfgfalconxr6interior.jpg

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i wonder :D if it will have shitty ill fitting plastic bits in it and other things that fall off or break :laugh:

you mean like the shitty plastic grab handles on a skyline ?

I fail to see how a big turbo 6 cyl will drink only 11 litres per 100 KM. Maybe when its revving below 1500 RPM without using the turbo.

Not using the turbo doesn't necessarily make it more fuel efficient. A lot of companies are using turbochargers to improve fuel economy, not necessarily squeeze more power. Using FI and making a little bit of boost permits the driver / auto box to hold a higher gear rather than shifting, which can bring gains in economy.

A TT V35 / Z33 is noticably more efficient, while commuting sensibly around town, than a stock NA car.

In the Drive section of the past Saturday's Age they reviewed all of the new Falcon series. The new XR6 turbo drank 18.3L per 100kms with some "spirited" driving! So much for being more fuel efficient and singing the praises of the 6 speed box.

I still like it but that fuel economy is ridiculous. Not many will buy these with rising fuel prices. I can't imagine Ford releasing a twin turbo when they change over the engines.

R32 went from 89 to 94...

and the new ford is ugly..

and which moron said how does the new gtr compare.. you've got to be kidding me right..

it doesnt compare.. the ford is a nice family car.. its not a super car lol

5.1 secs 0-100 is an awesome time for a family car.. absolutely shockin if u try to compare it with super cars

In honestly thou, i like the look of the fat VE.. big gaurds and all. maybe not so much the HSV range with those ugly as rear lights... but teh SS V is a nice lookin car.. but this ford blows the doors off it :P

This car is going to be the new Aussie performance king for sure. 5.1/13.4 with the A/C on is ridiculous fast for a stock $45K car. Rated fuel economy is actually 10.9L/100km and it has launch control. Wait till MOTOR get their hands on it.

I'm more excited by the F6 though - same car with an extra 40kw - tipped to be a mid 12 second factory car - exhaust, boost, ECU edit (under $2K) easy 11's, maybe 10's :whistling:

Still I dunno - I bought a new BA XR6 had heaps of warranty claims and its resale was terrible (lost $20K in just over a year). Turbos have better resale though and Holden are just as bad...Point is no matter how fast Ford/Holden make these cars go, I wouldnt buy another till they up the quality - I'm not asking for Jap/Euro quality but for the price you expect the car to not be in the dealer once a month getting warranty fixed.

I will be looking at getting the G6E Turbo in a few months time. Preety decent interior for an aussie built car.

And for all those saying its ugly and it has platic this and some other winge... look in your garage at what ur driving first before hanging shit on other cars

I drive an R32 GTR.. the interior is as plain as they come.. almost no shape, everythings black.

But its functional.. it doesnt have cuts or curves and sharp angles to make it ugly.. coz its just plain.

Problem is when u try to make a dash fancy.. then it goes ugly. When its plain, your not tryin anything so it doesnt bother anyone because its just plain..

plus who looks @ the dash when ur thrashin the crap outta ur car.. its not like u stop @ the next set of lights after uve won/lost and say, "hey man, thats a flash dash u got there buddy"

I drive an R32 GTR.. the interior is as plain as they come.. almost no shape, everythings black.

But its functional.. it doesnt have cuts or curves and sharp angles to make it ugly.. coz its just plain.

Problem is when u try to make a dash fancy.. then it goes ugly. When its plain, your not tryin anything so it doesnt bother anyone because its just plain..

plus who looks @ the dash when ur thrashin the crap outta ur car.. its not like u stop @ the next set of lights after uve won/lost and say, "hey man, thats a flash dash u got there buddy"

Wow, if you buy a car for the soul purpose of being a boy racer on the streets then sure, who gives a toss what the interior looks like. You may as well rip it all out and just leave your drivers seat, put in a roll cage and turn it into true D(ickhead)-spec drifter.

Back on topic. Good to see how far Australian built cars have come in terms of driveline performance over the past 5-10 years.

The zf6spd auto is a phenomenal transmission (makes you actually want to buy an auto!) and coupled with an I6 turbo engine really shows what they are capable of, even the performance times thus far back this up. Having driven a number of different variants, you can certainly tell how good it really is. With the addition of transient over boost, as well as launch assist, i would love to see how the xr6t 6spd manual performs on the track.

f**k off man. who seriously sits in there car and goes

"ohh f**k i have a nice dash"

u get in and u see where everything is see how it all works and chances are u look @ ur dash a few times if its a new car

then u get over it

they have come a long way... and theyre very good now.. probably best/fastest family cars out

f**k off man. who seriously sits in there car and goes

"ohh f**k i have a nice dash"

u get in and u see where everything is see how it all works and chances are u look @ ur dash a few times if its a new car

then u get over it

they have come a long way... and theyre very good now.. probably best/fastest family cars out

I was going to get a 06 STI when I was looking for a new car in 06 but the cheap looking interior turned me off. Why pay 60K for a car with the same interior as the 20K base model.

There are 2 main types of interiors, luxury and boyracer. You fit into one of these through the course of your life.

I really really do not like it. There is something about that styling that doesnt agree with me

Wait for the 427 GTS

The W427 looks like shit?

Sure it's 7 litres and 370-odd kw but I'll bet it won't go that much better than the FPV F6 to warrant the extra cost. It'll be a car made for the die hard Holden fans (That'll probably get munched by someone that gets an F6 and plays with the power a little bit - or someone with an R35 lol)

I seriously doubt that ford will allow the turbo to be so quick.( 12s ). The trend in the past has always been to push the V8 for the top line performance car and the everything else after it. if the factory turbo falc is running that fast it will kill the market for the V8...As for a twin turbo V6 in the future model....I am a little sceptical they will do this,maybe if it comes from Ford US twin turbo, but I just dont see Ford Oz going down the engineering path trying to squeeze twin turbos onto a V6. Its a far more expensive excercise than the single turbo straight six currently in production

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...