Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, I posted some information about my RB20DET with twin stock RB20 turbos, but ive been hearing from alot on people that is is going to be extremely laggy. So ive decided to make to the turbos in sequential.

We are going to put a valve in the exhaust manifold so that when one of the turbos is spooled up, the valve will open and allow the other turbo to spool up.

i believe that another 1 way valve will be needed where the compressed air is , so that it wont travel into the other turbo while one is only spooled up.

if anyone has any comments of knows how this works or if this will even work or ANYTHING please post

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21472-sequential-turbos-rb20dett/
Share on other sites

If you have two 3-1 manifolds so three cylinders are feeding 1 turbo each it wont work. You will be wasting half your exhaust gas.

To get the boost response you want you would need to have a 6-2 manifold that has a shut off valve to one turbo to allow the other to spool up normally, probably slower than normal because of the messy manifold.

You would then have a massive flat spot when you open the valve because you halve the gas flow to the turbo thats making the boost and have to wait for the other to spool up. Plus there is a hell of a lot of plumbing, have a look at a factory sequencial car, plus the fact that sequencial cars have 1 small and 1 large turbo.

You will be better off with two smaller turbos on two 3-1 manifolds. get a pair of GTR turbos if possible, or a pair of T25s and modify the manifolds to a T2 flange. You will not get a good response from the 2 RB20 turbos, 5000rpm plus.

Sorry mate

I think the RB20/25 turbo share the exhaust housing and turbine wheel and it is one of the smallest on the mid frame turbos.

When you get smaller, as in T25/28, the turbo has a smaller core. I don't know whether one of the housings off these turbos will fit.

You'd still need to change the flanges on the manifolds though

Originally posted by Squizz

The same could be asked of an Aussie 31 driver spending way too much on brakes and suspension...

.... but that is such an easy concept to understand... brake and suspension upgrades so he can go faster...

... two turbos that are oversized, attempting to make a never seen (at least by me) setup on a RB20DET, hard enough to get the twins running without messing around with sequential setups... im sure someone more technical minded could expand, but I can't really see it being a viable exercise...

The simple (and cheaper) option would be as suggested smaller twins or a bigger single!

Shut up squizz.

He needs to ask himself why.

He is talking about crazy plumbing valve setups for two turbos, and he doesnt even know how sequential turbos work.

Squizz - my brakes and suspension were suitable, realistic, and researched. They were done, and work extremely well. Very different to this crazy idea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...