Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

this isnt the first 6 boost manifold i've heard of with this issue. not to slander 6boost's work but i know of a std rb26 running a 6boost mani,tial 44 and gt3582 and it sky rocketed to 24psi every run! the problem lies in the collector where the gate is picked up from..

im confused as to how removing the exhaust will help lower boost, a restriction will SLOW the exhaust wheel down creating less boost pressure.. i speak first hand on that as i've experienced just that with a blocked cat.

if you've completly removed the gate and its still boosting then i think you have your answer haha

Sorry if this has already been sujested.

I use to get HUGE boost spikes over around 4000rpm. I changed turbos and wastegates 3 times and still had the same issues. Had a thread on here to see if any one had any ideas.

It ended up being the igniter wasn't earthed properly which inturn gave me very retarted timing. If the timing is retarted the fuel/air will still be conbusting when the exhaust valve opens which spools the turbo up like crazy.

My wategate isn't as big as yours and I am running a heavily modified RB30DET and if my timing is too retarted I get the same issue. Try advancing your base timing to see if that helps or advancing it up top where you get the boost spiking on your ECU. Also make sure your igniter has a good earth, mine was screwed into the stock plastic cover but I had to run an extra earth wire to get it to work properly.

I can also retard my timing and see 30psi of boost with the wastegate perm open. advance the timing back to 15degrese or so and its fixed.

Edited by Finny

Lets get this right..

you totally removed the WG from the car, then drove it. and the thing still wants to overboost with a great hole in the side of the manifold where the WG is spose to be?

If that is the case, you have some issues..

Like the guys above said, really bad timing and to much fuel.. or extremely poor WG pick up port.

I had the wastegate port issue on an ebay manifold. Totally crap pick up port. moved it, rewelded it 3 times, and then ported the daylights out of it to find out i had to move it yet again...

Would have been quicker to build a proper one from srcatch!

Had a chat to my mechanic and Andriano is partly right.

Even though i have a similar setup, with the same size ext housing on the turbo, you are running a bigger hp turbo, thus having a bigger ext wheel. The bigger wheel in the same size housing will not allow enough air to flow past through the housing without spinning the wheel faster and faster.

Two options: Upgrade to a 1.06a/r ext housing, will also give you better top end, or "bleed off" more gases (ie: larger feed to gate and larger gate or run 2 gates)

Either way not really the "fault" of the manifold design

I woulnd't blame the turbo.... I have a KKR560, .69 A/R rear and the internal wastegate is like 1 inch wide if that.

I had problems with my old KKR480 as it had a slightly worse wastegate design. But even still every one said the KKR480s over boost, I just ran 18 degrease timing and didn't have a problem.

Suppose I don't have to worry about that though as my RB30DET was built with low compression because I wanted a free running engine. Which was a VERY good idea in my case because I have had the engine for only 4 months and I have snapped the cam belt tentioner off once and the cam belt its self snapped about a month later. I love it when my valves are all the way down the piston can come up to top dead centre and it doesn't touch the valves :down:....

just to clarify, car went on the dyno a couple of hours ago, no gate at all we saw ~13psi, then backed off again as it didnt flatten out, it just kept going up and up.

nismoid, and other expressing the same opinions, the exhaust was dropped, and oh my god, YOU WONT BELIEVE WHAT HAPPENED...... nothing. nice try though guys, your wealth of experience shines through again.... still waiting on that explanation as to how a restrictive exhaust will cause creeping?

kyle himself has said there is a number of factors, and that we should try a bigger gate etc, f*ck knows why but hes pretty assertive that his manifold is fine and we should either put on a restrictive exhuast and/or weld the gate to the exhaust housing...

for those who say the gate is too small, an XR6T, although it has a bigger exhaust housing, is still a 4L motor and can be held so low (like 4psi) by its little internal gate, theres no way a 44mm exernal, atmo venting gate cant hold this thing to 15psi

my $ is on its location, if you weld it to the exhaust housing its probably your best bet, basically it seems when it opens, it cant divert enough back pressure, which results in unlimited boost

It ended up being the igniter wasn't earthed properly which inturn gave me very retarted timing. If the timing is retarted the fuel/air will still be conbusting when the exhaust valve opens which spools the turbo up like crazy.

My wategate....

^^ Most interesting post iv read in months. Very nice work!

I woulnd't blame the turbo.... I have a KKR560, .69 A/R rear and the internal wastegate is like 1 inch wide if that.

Completely different turbo mate.

Ever wonder why KKR turbos are so laggy? They are built cheaply with huge clearances and inefficient turbine designs.

I am talking about the internal clearance between ext wheel and ext. housing. As the ext. wheel is pretty big for a small housing you will have boost control issues. The only way to solve the issue is to slow the gases going into the turbo, whether my timing adjustment or by bleeding off more exhaust gases.

Have a chat to Kyp at ATP, he is Victoria's No.1 turbo guru.

Have you compared the trim specs from an XR6 turbo to this turbo? You'll probably find a few differences, so pretty pointless comparing the two :D

this isnt the ideal way but physically theres no room....also i have been fitting it this way on all 6boost manifold and never had an issue

post-15564-1208612645_thumb.jpg

HOLY.......f**k

You mean to tell me, after all these problems, and all the calls, that I was just silly enough not to ask if you had mounted the gate off the manifold with the SUPPLIED f**kING BEND??!!! The picture tells the exact reason you have bloody boost creep issues!! Did I supply it with a 90 degree bend and some straight pipe?? NOOOO!!!!! Because you have a manifold that is so efficient that under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should you mount the gate more than 50mm away unless you have a 60mm gate!

Tell you what, wish I had of known this sooner, I would have told you to just chop the gate pipe off in the car without removing anything and given it a run. Hey presto, boost control! There is room to mount the gate up high, if I can fit a GT42 and 4" dump with a 44mm gate up high, you can fit one as well, keeping the ABS and all. 2 whole threads on this same subject and finally, an answer. Andrew, DO NOT mount the gate down there, and you will have no issues.

6BOOST

no offence to you kyle, have one of your manifolds and love it, works a treat (after some mods)...

but every one of your manifolds that i have dealt with have boost creep problems and there have been several, this is not a one off

problem seems to be a combination of manifolds being so efficient at the collector, 90 degree angle of the gate pipe off the collector and size of pipe used for this pipe. its a simple fix.

it seems unreasonable that the pipe used to connect the gate by you is usually much smaller than the size of gates people use, you should look at putting a larger 50mm pipe on a upwards angle, going slightly with the flow (not 90 degrees to the direction of flow).

on topic now: yes gate placement is stupid in this case and making the problem very bad, as kyle said mount the gate close to the manifold not down low...

No offence taken, however to highlight the points you just raised, my gate outlet comes off the collector at 30deg, I cut every single one of them and put in a big box with my drop saw every few weeks, so I know the angle, maybe you haven't taken notice before. Secondly to that, the gate outlet pipe is 42mm id. A Tial 44mm gate(most common I and my customers seem to use) is measured at the valve, not the hole in the inlet, which is actually around 41mm or the same as the outlet pipe. The other most common gate is the turbosmart 48mm, which as a 45mm hole in the inlet flange, again, only 1.5mm per side bigger than the pipe I use, there is no such thing as 50mm pipe. Conversly, the next size up pipe has a diameter of 54-55mm ID, its so big that the gates we are talking about, the flange would fit INSIDE the gate outlet. This in my eyes would cause massive turbulence into the gate... Would the bigger outlet pipe make up for any downsides to the flange transition?? I don't know.

Simple fact is, if anyone has a probem with boost control, calls me, and actually listens to what I have to say, rather than just look for someone to blame, rarely can you not get a workable result easily. Its just most people want to listen to the advise of others, rather than the designer of the product who has done over 1000 manifolds and encountered every problem first hand along the way. Often removing one of the springs in the 1 bar gates helps, as does a change of cam timing, and also putting a proper cat in, the back pressure reduces boost. Simply put, if you want to run your car like a race car with a 3.5"+ exhaust, no cat and 1 muffler, then run a race style 50-60mm gate, don't expect to use the best manifold on the market thats is designed to stop turbulence, reversion and increase velocity, and expect to use a street style(for the application) 40-45mm gate.

6BOOST

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...