Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

this isnt the first 6 boost manifold i've heard of with this issue. not to slander 6boost's work but i know of a std rb26 running a 6boost mani,tial 44 and gt3582 and it sky rocketed to 24psi every run! the problem lies in the collector where the gate is picked up from..

im confused as to how removing the exhaust will help lower boost, a restriction will SLOW the exhaust wheel down creating less boost pressure.. i speak first hand on that as i've experienced just that with a blocked cat.

if you've completly removed the gate and its still boosting then i think you have your answer haha

Sorry if this has already been sujested.

I use to get HUGE boost spikes over around 4000rpm. I changed turbos and wastegates 3 times and still had the same issues. Had a thread on here to see if any one had any ideas.

It ended up being the igniter wasn't earthed properly which inturn gave me very retarted timing. If the timing is retarted the fuel/air will still be conbusting when the exhaust valve opens which spools the turbo up like crazy.

My wategate isn't as big as yours and I am running a heavily modified RB30DET and if my timing is too retarted I get the same issue. Try advancing your base timing to see if that helps or advancing it up top where you get the boost spiking on your ECU. Also make sure your igniter has a good earth, mine was screwed into the stock plastic cover but I had to run an extra earth wire to get it to work properly.

I can also retard my timing and see 30psi of boost with the wastegate perm open. advance the timing back to 15degrese or so and its fixed.

Edited by Finny

Lets get this right..

you totally removed the WG from the car, then drove it. and the thing still wants to overboost with a great hole in the side of the manifold where the WG is spose to be?

If that is the case, you have some issues..

Like the guys above said, really bad timing and to much fuel.. or extremely poor WG pick up port.

I had the wastegate port issue on an ebay manifold. Totally crap pick up port. moved it, rewelded it 3 times, and then ported the daylights out of it to find out i had to move it yet again...

Would have been quicker to build a proper one from srcatch!

Had a chat to my mechanic and Andriano is partly right.

Even though i have a similar setup, with the same size ext housing on the turbo, you are running a bigger hp turbo, thus having a bigger ext wheel. The bigger wheel in the same size housing will not allow enough air to flow past through the housing without spinning the wheel faster and faster.

Two options: Upgrade to a 1.06a/r ext housing, will also give you better top end, or "bleed off" more gases (ie: larger feed to gate and larger gate or run 2 gates)

Either way not really the "fault" of the manifold design

I woulnd't blame the turbo.... I have a KKR560, .69 A/R rear and the internal wastegate is like 1 inch wide if that.

I had problems with my old KKR480 as it had a slightly worse wastegate design. But even still every one said the KKR480s over boost, I just ran 18 degrease timing and didn't have a problem.

Suppose I don't have to worry about that though as my RB30DET was built with low compression because I wanted a free running engine. Which was a VERY good idea in my case because I have had the engine for only 4 months and I have snapped the cam belt tentioner off once and the cam belt its self snapped about a month later. I love it when my valves are all the way down the piston can come up to top dead centre and it doesn't touch the valves :down:....

just to clarify, car went on the dyno a couple of hours ago, no gate at all we saw ~13psi, then backed off again as it didnt flatten out, it just kept going up and up.

nismoid, and other expressing the same opinions, the exhaust was dropped, and oh my god, YOU WONT BELIEVE WHAT HAPPENED...... nothing. nice try though guys, your wealth of experience shines through again.... still waiting on that explanation as to how a restrictive exhaust will cause creeping?

kyle himself has said there is a number of factors, and that we should try a bigger gate etc, f*ck knows why but hes pretty assertive that his manifold is fine and we should either put on a restrictive exhuast and/or weld the gate to the exhaust housing...

for those who say the gate is too small, an XR6T, although it has a bigger exhaust housing, is still a 4L motor and can be held so low (like 4psi) by its little internal gate, theres no way a 44mm exernal, atmo venting gate cant hold this thing to 15psi

my $ is on its location, if you weld it to the exhaust housing its probably your best bet, basically it seems when it opens, it cant divert enough back pressure, which results in unlimited boost

It ended up being the igniter wasn't earthed properly which inturn gave me very retarted timing. If the timing is retarted the fuel/air will still be conbusting when the exhaust valve opens which spools the turbo up like crazy.

My wategate....

^^ Most interesting post iv read in months. Very nice work!

I woulnd't blame the turbo.... I have a KKR560, .69 A/R rear and the internal wastegate is like 1 inch wide if that.

Completely different turbo mate.

Ever wonder why KKR turbos are so laggy? They are built cheaply with huge clearances and inefficient turbine designs.

I am talking about the internal clearance between ext wheel and ext. housing. As the ext. wheel is pretty big for a small housing you will have boost control issues. The only way to solve the issue is to slow the gases going into the turbo, whether my timing adjustment or by bleeding off more exhaust gases.

Have a chat to Kyp at ATP, he is Victoria's No.1 turbo guru.

Have you compared the trim specs from an XR6 turbo to this turbo? You'll probably find a few differences, so pretty pointless comparing the two :D

this isnt the ideal way but physically theres no room....also i have been fitting it this way on all 6boost manifold and never had an issue

post-15564-1208612645_thumb.jpg

HOLY.......f**k

You mean to tell me, after all these problems, and all the calls, that I was just silly enough not to ask if you had mounted the gate off the manifold with the SUPPLIED f**kING BEND??!!! The picture tells the exact reason you have bloody boost creep issues!! Did I supply it with a 90 degree bend and some straight pipe?? NOOOO!!!!! Because you have a manifold that is so efficient that under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should you mount the gate more than 50mm away unless you have a 60mm gate!

Tell you what, wish I had of known this sooner, I would have told you to just chop the gate pipe off in the car without removing anything and given it a run. Hey presto, boost control! There is room to mount the gate up high, if I can fit a GT42 and 4" dump with a 44mm gate up high, you can fit one as well, keeping the ABS and all. 2 whole threads on this same subject and finally, an answer. Andrew, DO NOT mount the gate down there, and you will have no issues.

6BOOST

no offence to you kyle, have one of your manifolds and love it, works a treat (after some mods)...

but every one of your manifolds that i have dealt with have boost creep problems and there have been several, this is not a one off

problem seems to be a combination of manifolds being so efficient at the collector, 90 degree angle of the gate pipe off the collector and size of pipe used for this pipe. its a simple fix.

it seems unreasonable that the pipe used to connect the gate by you is usually much smaller than the size of gates people use, you should look at putting a larger 50mm pipe on a upwards angle, going slightly with the flow (not 90 degrees to the direction of flow).

on topic now: yes gate placement is stupid in this case and making the problem very bad, as kyle said mount the gate close to the manifold not down low...

No offence taken, however to highlight the points you just raised, my gate outlet comes off the collector at 30deg, I cut every single one of them and put in a big box with my drop saw every few weeks, so I know the angle, maybe you haven't taken notice before. Secondly to that, the gate outlet pipe is 42mm id. A Tial 44mm gate(most common I and my customers seem to use) is measured at the valve, not the hole in the inlet, which is actually around 41mm or the same as the outlet pipe. The other most common gate is the turbosmart 48mm, which as a 45mm hole in the inlet flange, again, only 1.5mm per side bigger than the pipe I use, there is no such thing as 50mm pipe. Conversly, the next size up pipe has a diameter of 54-55mm ID, its so big that the gates we are talking about, the flange would fit INSIDE the gate outlet. This in my eyes would cause massive turbulence into the gate... Would the bigger outlet pipe make up for any downsides to the flange transition?? I don't know.

Simple fact is, if anyone has a probem with boost control, calls me, and actually listens to what I have to say, rather than just look for someone to blame, rarely can you not get a workable result easily. Its just most people want to listen to the advise of others, rather than the designer of the product who has done over 1000 manifolds and encountered every problem first hand along the way. Often removing one of the springs in the 1 bar gates helps, as does a change of cam timing, and also putting a proper cat in, the back pressure reduces boost. Simply put, if you want to run your car like a race car with a 3.5"+ exhaust, no cat and 1 muffler, then run a race style 50-60mm gate, don't expect to use the best manifold on the market thats is designed to stop turbulence, reversion and increase velocity, and expect to use a street style(for the application) 40-45mm gate.

6BOOST

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...