Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi There,

I am after a genuine stock turbo from a r32 or r33 to fit in my hr31 coupe red top rb20det.

I am keeping the complete stock look so I need a original nissan unit.

Any turbo from a r32 or r33 would be a big improvement on the pissy red top version.

First choice r32 so I can bolt on with no mods at all however would consider r33 which also fits with a few

minor mods.

Low km,s in great condition would be nice with no oil leaks like my current unit even though it has only done 80,000km.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/215843-r32-or-r33-stock-turbo-wanted/
Share on other sites

just wondering if I can keep my existing actuator from my red top rb20det if I upgrade

to a r32 or r33 stock turbo or best to replace with new actuator and dump pipe.

I am in S/E suburbs so would consider what has been offered so far.

Bluebird

Come pic up my R32 turbo for $100. I'm in SE Melb. Turbo was running fine when I pulled it off the car. Upgraded the R33 unit. Housings have been rotated but can fix that easily. Also the compressor outlet has had the 3 tabs cut off to fit a silicone joiner over it.

o.k

Can I just confirm one thing.

A r32 silvertop rb20det stock turbo will fit on my r31 red top rb20det.

No mods required.

actuator,banjo bolts , water and oil lines all match up.

no tune required

dump pipe same, elbow same etc

Remember i am not after performance gains here.

Car is to remain stock.

After all any turbo would perform better than the stock red top unit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...