Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt3540 .82


R34NRG
 Share

Recommended Posts

got a 44mm atm but for some reason (most likely manifold design or something else) is spiking up to 20psi with no gate.

a 44MM SHOULD be big enough rite?

spoke to kyle he thinks i should upgrade to a 60mm and redesign the manifold.

if a 40mm is big enough ill just modify the manifold rather then spending another 800bux on a new gate.

HELP PLZZZZZZ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my mate has the same exhuast manifold as you and gt3540 .82 and with no boost controller (just gate pressure) he can only get as low as 23-24psi, not ideal in anyones language if u ask me, also heard a few others who have same issues and cant get boost down below that. One of the tuners told me they weld a wastegate pipe straight off the exhauast housing to solve it and it works fine.

Edited by unique1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would the small housing have much to do with that?

I don't know. I was just posting my experience with slightly smaller turbo and gate on smaller engine. I had a nasty home grown manifold slapped together. So i guess my info is not relevant. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the amount of air the rb30 can flow over the rb20 is so much its pointless to even compare.

theres a r33 2.5L running the exactly same manifold, exact turbo and exhaust housing. almost identical. and it runs fine with a 44mm. but mine wont.

just dont understand how it could be to small when Xr6Ts are 4L and run internal gates and have no issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just dont understand how it could be to small when Xr6Ts are 4L and run internal gates and have no issue.

and thats were the answers are...

whats different between the your turbo and the xr6 gt35r?

First the exhaust housing is larger, but thats mainly becuase its a 4L motor and its obviously going to pump more air and the last thing they want is the turbo to "choke" which would cause boost to DROP off. So if you housing was too small, you wouldnt have boost creep, but it would drop off in boost at the higher rpm mark so that cant be marked off as a problem

Secondly is obviously the fords run a internal wastegate version. At a stock level they dont seem to have much of a problem holding boost, but if you talk to some of the boys playing with these cars its quite common for them to port the wastegate out abit and stick a bigger wastegate "flapper" on and they hold boost fine after that. So with the internal wastegate setup they dont run into a problem of having the wastegate pipe in the wrong part of the manifold, or not in the best location on the collector since the whole thing is done in the actual exhaust housing itself, which leads to the only logical answer to your problem, it has to be the wastegate pipe location on the manifold.

Even without a wastegate wat so ever, i would still expect to see the turbo spool and make a psi or 2 boost, but no where near what your making. I dont see how a bigger wastegate will fix anything because your making 13psi (according to the dyno graph) with out any wastegate at all, the system is having trouble releasing the exhaust gases on the manifold side of things.

I hope you get this sorted cause im going to run the exact same manifold/turbo/wastegate setup as you, and i dont want these problems :)

Edited by R34GTFOUR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a picture of the manifold and how the wastegate is connected to the collector. Have seen a few manifolds that have poor boost modulation because of the way the wastegate pipe is connected to the manifold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a long thread on how to size wastegate correctly, here is the abreviated version.....

I have pretty good success using this formula to determine external wastegate sizes;

Airflow in lbs per minute = diameter of wastegate in mm X boost correction factor

So let's apply it to your car;

300 rwkw = 480 bhp

480 bhp = 44 lbs of airflow = 44 mm wastegate

Now if you want to run 19 psi, then that's the right size wastegate.

But we need to apply the boost correction....

My experience indicates that to get 300 rwkw out of a GT3040 you would need to run around 1.5 bar (22psi). So using the formula...

44 / 22 X 19 = 38 mm.

For those who haven't read the thread..............

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=43638

To apply the formula to this example I need some more information, what power it is at right now and the final power target?

Quite often I get guys who want to use a lower boost limit for running in than their final power target. This dual requirement can cause issues with the wastegate sizing, they need a larger than desirable one to bleed off enough exhaust for the running in boost level.

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

car is looking to make a bit over 350 at ~20psi, maybe a lil bit more. i think this thread sorta came about because kyle (6boost guy) said he needs a bigger gate, even though the car was making ~13psi @ ~5krpm with no gate on it what so ever....

but for the purpose of this thread, do you think the 44mm will be big enough? i told him it would be lol, so dont make me look like a c*nt ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Airflow in lbs per minute = diameter of wastegate in mm X boost correction factor

350 rwkw = 550 bhp

550 bhp = 55 lbs of airflow = 55 mm wastegate

If you want to run 19 psi, then that's the right size wastegate.

But my experience has been that to get 350 rwkw out of a GT3540 you would need to run around 1.5 bar (22psi).

So we need to apply the boost correction, using the formula.

55 / 22 X 19 = 48 mm

So the 44 mm wastegate will be a bit too small even at 22 psi, let alone your optimistic 20 psi target. I think 48 mm is more like it.

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the car has no wastegate on it...you would think that the thing would struggle to make boost. Air is bloody lazy and will take the path of least resistance. So the fact that it makes 13psi with an open pipe...well i think that hints that the way the wastegate is tied into the collector is the issue.

Cant really see enough from the pic that Paul has taken. Surely putting a bigger wastegate on it is a band aid to the bigger progblem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is the manifold in question

mani.jpg

oilwater.jpg

the turbo/manifold/gate is sold as a package. you would expect after so many people having the exact same problem they would change the design, or stop selling the package untill the problems are sorted out

my advice has been to modify the wastegate pipe off the manifold, fairly expensive exercise when everything has been fabricated to suit already

Edited by DCIEVE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its the manifold I'm thinking of there is a central spire inside - the bottom of the wastegate port needs to be at least level to the top of that spire and preferably higher but obviously the flange dicatates how high you can move the outlet port.

Which is why people are welding the wastegate port off the turbine housing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:dave here..

yes the manifold is the issue.

6boost manifolds while almost as perfect as you can get for flow into the turbo, they are the worst for wastegate integration, as in all the gasses are aimed straight at the turbine with no turbulance. therefor its very hard for the air to make a 90 degree turn to a wastegate. and hence boost creep issues..

put the same wastegate on a generic one and its gonna hold boost rock steady because of the turbulance in the collector allows an easy path to the gate..

the only way you could fix the issue is to install an extra wastegate pipe into the collector and join them into the single wastegate. not hard to do with it on the bench.

perhaps putting a bigger gate on could fix it but its not the wastegates fault, rather the manifold.

oh, ps. the more boost you want the smaller the wastegate!!! (more air is going thru the turbo to create boost. and the more pressure in the manifold/turbine to make it easier to regulate... instead of relying on aerodynamics in the manifold for the wastegate, it is more of a pop off valve. if you get my point..

cheers :cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the car has no wastegate on it...you would think that the thing would struggle to make boost. Air is bloody lazy and will take the path of least resistance. So the fact that it makes 13psi with an open pipe...well i think that hints that the way the wastegate is tied into the collector is the issue.

Cant really see enough from the pic that Paul has taken. Surely putting a bigger wastegate on it is a band aid to the bigger progblem?

On a comparison basis, 13 psi with an open pipe and 20 psi with the wastegate fitted would seem to me to indicate that the wastegate isn't flowing enough. If the wastegate was of sufficient size then there should only be 1 or 2 psi difference.

As an asside, I have yet to find an externally gated exhaust manifold that faciliates zero boost. Anything decent accentuates the flow to the turbine, so some boost is always produced.

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a comparison basis, 13 psi with an open pipe and 20 psi with the wastegate fitted would seem to me to indicate that the wastegate isn't flowing enough. If the wastegate was of sufficient size then there should only be 1 or 2 psi difference.

As an asside, I have yet to find an externally gated exhaust manifold that faciliates zero boost. Anything decent accentuates the flow to the turbine, so some boost is always produced.

Cheers

Gary

Or it simply has the wrong spring installed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Latest Posts

    • Just watched the video, that's wild! Could it be there's some tiny air pockets in the caliper causing unequal force when the pedal is pressed?
    • Pedal to floor is not caliper flex. Pedal to floor is hydraulic leaking/bypassing. You quite possibly stuffed the seals in the MC when you were bleeding. A common mistake the unitiated make is to push the pedal down too far when bleeding with an MC that has been in use a long time. Crud builds up on the MC wall just past the furthest it is ever pushed in use. That crud can be hard enough to damage the seals when you push the piston down past when bleeding. Might be time for a kit in the MC.
    • Just buy a software license and put the stock maps into the (tuned for a worked engine) Nistune. It is not difficult. I cannot imagine owning Nistune without owning Nistune Software. Just....how could anyone contemplate it?
    • 25Neo injectors are  3/4 length with 14mm o-rings at both ends and the Denso plug. Like these. https://www.nzefi.com/product/nissan-r34-rb25det-neo-r35-gtr-350z-370z-720ccmin-top-feed-direct-fit-fuel-injector-kit/ You can probably fit any 14mm o-ring injector you like to that manifold, provided they are not too short or too long. And even if they are too short or too long, you can add spacers to the injectors or to the fuel rail mounting legs if you really needed to. Though I'd be hard pressed to believe that you would attempt it with anything other than brand new EV14s like the ones I linked. Having said the above, if the picture of the injector you posted has anything to do with the manifold, it looks like they are specifying full length injectors. So you'd just buy the full length part number instead of the 3/4 length part number. But I can't see any mention of that injector length on that manifold's eBay page, so perhaps you should ask the vendor.
    • Hello SAU, I recently purchased an Alcon TA6 kit through a QLD company who supplies the dog bones/rotors etc. The kit has 356x36mm rotors - aluminium dog bones - TA6 calipers. I used the HEL brake lines I already have. Kit appears to be of high quality.....as much as visually i guess it can be. What I have noticed after install and pressure bleeding (and pedal bleeding) multiple times is that the calliper is flexing a decent amount when the pedal is pushed - enough that i can push the pedal to the floor as the calliper just keeps on flexing. Details: 1. OEM master cylinder @ 15/16" (BM44 - non ABS GTST) 2. OEM everything else on brake system - rear callipers etc. Just braided lines (front/rear) and the TA6 front kit 3. The TA6 calliper has ~2% smaller piston area than the OEM 4 pot sumitomo calliper - so no issue there.....i dont think. TA6 is 27/31.8/38.1 and OEM is 40.4/40.4 4. Have checked the calliper flex with car on (booster assistance) and off - same result just have to push harder with car off 5. Have unbolted calliper from the dog bone so its just resting on the disc and tested again - same thing - so flex of the dog bone doesnt seem to be an issue 6. Tried to measure pedal ratio as best i could - looks to be about 4.8:1 with some margin for error - ignoring the booster with 50kg of leg (beeeefy - but with booster probably fairly achievable) thats about 770psi of brake pressure which doesnt seem super high - but maybe it is?? So 75kg of leg = 1150psi. I guess my question is - is this normal? Alcon distributors over here have been helpful but ultimately have said its normal. I feel like modulation is bad as only the first 30-40% of pedal pressure/travel does anything. After that its a mix of flex....and maybe some extra clamp force. My old setup - Ksport 8 pots with 12 years of track work on them did not have this issue - pedal was solid. Only reason for change was a hub failure caused the disc to tear one of the callipers to bits. Thanks SAU - any thoughts/help would be appreciated. 20240303_124128 (1) (1).mp4
×
×
  • Create New...