Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I had the gearbox reconditioned in my R33 gtst recently. It used to have problems crunching going into 4th and 5th if you didn't let the revs drop and this was fixed which I'm pretty happy about.

There's still a few things that are bothering me though which didn't really improve:

- Still a bit notchy if you shift quickly. Much better if you give it a half second before pushing through.

- Used to be a bit noisy when idling in neutral. Now it's a lot more noisy (especially noticeable from the outside). The guy that did the recondition claims the gears don't mesh very precisely on these boxes and hence the noise.

- Sometimes won't go into reverse. After you blip the clutch goes in ok.

I have the redline lightweight shockproof oil in it now.

I guess what I'd like to know is whether all these sound normal for this gearbox. Should the recondition have made a bigger difference?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/216657-gearbox-recondition/
Share on other sites

Actually that seems a little odd to me. No the gearbox really shouldn't make any noticable noise especially with new bearings etc in. Maybe talk to another gearbox guy. What did they actually recondition?

also - did they tell you to run redline in it? Its not a great idea especially in a new gearbox. Redline themselves don't recommend it for synchro boxes and most people only use it to mask worn synchros in the first place. Since you have new synchros (i assume) you should just run a normal gearbox oil.

Hey Guys,

I had the gearbox reconditioned in my R33 gtst recently. It used to have problems crunching going into 4th and 5th if you didn't let the revs drop and this was fixed which I'm pretty happy about.

There's still a few things that are bothering me though which didn't really improve:

- Still a bit notchy if you shift quickly. Much better if you give it a half second before pushing through.

- Used to be a bit noisy when idling in neutral. Now it's a lot more noisy (especially noticeable from the outside). The guy that did the recondition claims the gears don't mesh very precisely on these boxes and hence the noise.

- Sometimes won't go into reverse. After you blip the clutch goes in ok.

I have the redline lightweight shockproof oil in it now.

I guess what I'd like to know is whether all these sound normal for this gearbox. Should the recondition have made a bigger difference?

Cheers

Just out of curiosity, how much did you spend on re-conditioning your box?

Hey Guys,

I had the gearbox reconditioned in my R33 gtst recently. It used to have problems crunching going into 4th and 5th if you didn't let the revs drop and this was fixed which I'm pretty happy about.

There's still a few things that are bothering me though which didn't really improve:

- Still a bit notchy if you shift quickly. Much better if you give it a half second before pushing through.

- Used to be a bit noisy when idling in neutral. Now it's a lot more noisy (especially noticeable from the outside). The guy that did the recondition claims the gears don't mesh very precisely on these boxes and hence the noise.

- Sometimes won't go into reverse. After you blip the clutch goes in ok.

I have the redline lightweight shockproof oil in it now.

I guess what I'd like to know is whether all these sound normal for this gearbox. Should the recondition have made a bigger difference?

Cheers

Hi there ,I agree with duncan that a new or re-coed gearbox should not use redline don't worry about what you've already read ,it is too slipperry to allow your synchros and more importantly your synchro hubs to work properly I found that out from an expert gtr gearbox repairer,I would replace it immediately with a good quality oil such as VMX80 to avoid the same problems you re-coed it for re-occurring.

I am re-coeing mine for the same reason and it is a costly exercise so you only want to do it once,ask yourself should you be having synchro problems when they have been re-placed?Also did they replace the thrust bearing in the clutch while the box was out,generally these will make the external noise you describe or you may have a twin plate clutch which are inherrently noisy also but I guess you would have noticed that before the re-co wouldn't you.

Just as a matter of interest what did the job cost you as I'm shopping around at the moment and would like a ball-park figure if you don't mind.Cheers Grey Pearl.

they may have re-used your bearings instead of using new items which could explain the noise, $1500 did that include r&r of the box?

The syncros are a little slow on these boxes when shifting easily IMO

Edited by mattymagoo22

I guess that's not the problem then. My whirring noise is only there when the clutch is engaged (foot off the pedal). It goes away when I depress the pedal though. (You only really hear it distinctly in neutral though since there's a lot more noise from everything when accelerating).

dont use redline in rebiult boxes LOL thats a load of rubbish, we use the blue redline in all our gtr and race boxes we biuld Works much better than standard, what a load of sh#t
Hi There mate, All comments posted on here are only opinions gathered in real life experiences with our own cars,or collated information gathered on forums in order to learn from others mistakes or successes,and include our opinions based on that info collected and processed,so theres no need in flaming people for putting their views in response to others problems and questions.

Ultimately the person requiring answers will do what they like with the info posted for their benefit and really we giving the answers are only giving them info to process and decide what sounds right for them to do as we have done when we ask questions.

I have given what I believe is good advice on not using smurfs blood in gtr boxes,especially new, recoed,or synchroed,you probably being a racer use some type of after market dog box with or without synchros and that oil probably does the job in that application as I have stated in my other post on this oil,race teams are prepared to pull engines and boxes diffs etc down to repair and modify as regularly as necessary as opposed to street users like myself who have to deal with synchro issues, slower changes and not wanting noisy boxes in order to minimise downtime and save expense,so for me it's horses for courses and of course all of my statements are only my opinion,and these forums do allow for that but are opposed to non constructive flaming and arguing.

I have a peacemaking attitude and only wish to help other people on this forum to enjoy our common interest and learn,therefore I accept your opinion as I hope you will accept mine whether we agree or not, I'm not trying to force my point of view on anyone only air it for others to consider,fair enough.Grey Pearl.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...