Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://blogs.motortrend.com/6247428/new-ca...rned/index.html

Nissan engineers insist the GT-R really does only have 480 hp. Motohiro Matsumura, president of Nissan Technical Center North America, Inc. in Farmington Hills, Michigan, says our dyno test story, which revealed the GT-R develops 430 hp at the wheels, is basically right. But he insists our estimate of a minimum 15-percent friction losses -- which suggests the GT-R is making 507 hp -- is wrong. Matsumura-san says ultra-low friction bearings in the wheel hubs and transmission, plus the careful alignment of the all-wheel-drive system's propshafts, mean friction losses are reduced to an unprecedented 10 percent or so. We're going to get a GT-R back and conduct some coast-down tests to see if he's right.

10% drive train loss!!!!!!!!! WTF!!! :D:banana::down::blink:

I believe him. The 911 turbo has the same power but is 100 or so odd kilos lighter. The GTR accelerates faster to 150km/h than the turbo but from then on, the turbo walks away. Taking into account that the DSG in the GTR shifts much faster than the Auto in the turbo and that the turbo has higher gearing - if the GTR has any more than 500hp - the turbo, shouldn't be faster above 150km/h than the GTR.

someone gets it :)

haha - cool - wasn't sure cos "wtf" didn't convey much info :D

dude, read the first post, especially the bold bit

sorry - clicked on your link and then searched for 10% and found nothing - my bad :bunny:

ps. if it is that low that is quite amazing isn't it

no wuckez :)

the funny thing though is that if this engineer is telling the truth, what are the Corvette and Porka boys going to do now??? this was the only thing they could cling too.... "but it has like 1000hp from the factory, of course it's going to be quicker!"

sorry boys, just 480hp :bunny:

It will be interesting to see how reliable the GTR is in the long run. Fingers crossed that it will be tough as nails so that I can buy a good example 10 years from now; lol. Only 10% loss is phenomenal.

you better hope that whoever owns it before you has they're bore liners re-plasma coated every 100,00k's !!

why on earth is power at the engine relevent (esp when comparing it to another car)

the only thing that matters is how mcuh power ends up at the wheels

unless they have found some way for the engine to push it along the road directly.

maybe they have those guys are pretty smart

  • 4 weeks later...
you better hope that whoever owns it before you has they're bore liners re-plasma coated every 100,00k's !!

I think this is BS propagated by the "it must have a downside somewhere" haters.

read over this topic:

http://www.nagtroc.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=22403

and you come to the conclusion that IF the plasma coating ever needs reapplying it is likely to happen to the cars that have been tuned beyond design tolerances, rather than the production cars used like other typical exotics.

100,000 urban and highway kms is very different than 100,000 track kms or 100,000 change-only-at-redline tuned GTR kms.

I'm unconvinced. The engineer has an obligation to Nissan to keep the *power lies* a secret. They've done it before, why not now with so much at stake? Even just for PR purposes every Nissan employee will need to reaffirm the claims made by the company to avoid losing its credibility.

I say he's not making up sh!t about the low-friction bearings, though 10% friction loss is amazing AND an awesome alibi, but if the engine makes more power he won't tell you regardless.

If Nissan caught him tiddle-tadding he'd end up before the executive committee performing Seppuku.

Edited by R338OY

hahaha, disembowelment

anyways... i that there is a wacky loop-hole in the Yanks import laws that means they can separate an engine from the car itself, and basically bringing them in in pieces (before being sold through the stealerships).

I'm sure someone will whack one on an engine dyno at some stage.... can't hide then...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The car/ECU will have all the sensor that it needs and expect to have. I think i do not have to explain to you how the Link is way better specialy if you have swapped engine   I just do not want to deal with any "problems" cuz i have only Nistune which i learned is not that great and in my case cant even deal with that speed problem (Link can) And of course it will be way more easier to tune and diagnose and safe. And for the ECU/speed problem...i dont know.
    • Per Mark Roberts of Sonictune: Mark Robert Author At this time, no. No ETA either 2016-17 models. You will be able to purchase and install a 2018.5+ TCU though   TCU purchasing and pricing info! As we near the release of TCU tuning, I am going to answer some questions I get asked often.   What do I need for TCU tuning? At this time, you will need a 2018.5+ TCU to be able to tune. If you have a 2016-to early 2018, you will need to replace your TCU with the newer version. One good way to know if your TCU is good is if you have auto upshift in manual mode in 1st gear around 6500 rpms. If your manual 1st gear goes to 7k rpm and will hit the rev limiter unless you shift, you have the older TCU.   Why do I need to buy another ecu license/phone flash if I already have it on my ECU tune? The TCU is its own computer module. It is completely separate from the ECU. Because of this, you will be required to purchase a TCU license and, if your tuner has it, the phone flash license required to tune it via phone/bluetooth.   Do I need TCU tuning? TCU tuning is NOT required. However, the faster your setup, the more it will assist in track and dragy time consistency.   If I’m ECU tuned by (tuner A) can I get my TCU tuned by (Tuner ? Yes, since it’s a different module and a completely separate flash, you can have two different tuners. However, it is highly recommend that you have both tuned by the same tuner. For me, my TCU tuning will directly complement my ECU tuning style and features and running my ECU and another TCU or vice versa MIGHT cause some issues. At this time and for the foreseeable future, I will only be tuning my current ECU tuned customers TCUs.     I have a SYVECS AWD controller. Do I still need it? Yes! The AWD controllers main job is to control your AWD system. However, with TCU tuning, you will no longer need the auto-shift function as that will be done through the TCU. The AWD controller will still be very beneficial for racers looking to maximize traction on the launch.     Shift schedule changes: holding gears longer at lower pedal input as well as max shift rpm changes. Please note, the new ECU race rom coming out will address 90% of the shitty drivability issues these cars have through custom maps from myself and Racebox—as well as others I am sure.   Increase shift speeds: as seen in the videos I’ve been posting, the TCU shifts much faster once tuned.   Increased shift pressures: as also seen in the videos, much firmer full throttle shifts.      
    • Per Mark Roberts of Sonictune:     Mark Robert Author At this time, no. No ETA either 2016-17 models. You will be able to purchase and install a 2018.5+ TCU though   TCU purchasing and pricing info! As we near the release of TCU tuning, I am going to answer some questions I get asked often.   What do I need for TCU tuning? At this time, you will need a 2018.5+ TCU to be able to tune. If you have a 2016-to early 2018, you will need to replace your TCU with the newer version. One good way to know if your TCU is good is if you have auto upshift in manual mode in 1st gear around 6500 rpms. If your manual 1st gear goes to 7k rpm and will hit the rev limiter unless you shift, you have the older TCU.   Why do I need to buy another ecu license/phone flash if I already have it on my ECU tune? The TCU is its own computer module. It is completely separate from the ECU. Because of this, you will be required to purchase a TCU license and, if your tuner has it, the phone flash license required to tune it via phone/bluetooth.   Do I need TCU tuning? TCU tuning is NOT required. However, the faster your setup, the more it will assist in track and dragy time consistency.   If I’m ECU tuned by (tuner A) can I get my TCU tuned by (Tuner ? Yes, since it’s a different module and a completely separate flash, you can have two different tuners. However, it is highly recommend that you have both tuned by the same tuner. For me, my TCU tuning will directly complement my ECU tuning style and features and running my ECU and another TCU or vice versa MIGHT cause some issues. At this time and for the foreseeable future, I will only be tuning my current ECU tuned customers TCUs.     I have a SYVECS AWD controller. Do I still need it? Yes! The AWD controllers main job is to control your AWD system. However, with TCU tuning, you will no longer need the auto-shift function as that will be done through the TCU. The AWD controller will still be very beneficial for racers looking to maximize traction on the launch.     Shift schedule changes: holding gears longer at lower pedal input as well as max shift rpm changes. Please note, the new ECU race rom coming out will address 90% of the shitty drivability issues these cars have through custom maps from myself and Racebox—as well as others I am sure.   Increase shift speeds: as seen in the videos I’ve been posting, the TCU shifts much faster once tuned.   Increased shift pressures: as also seen in the videos, much firmer full throttle shifts.      
    • The fancy pants red shock tower brace is finally incoming from MX5 Mania, getting it shipped from 'Merica has been a long and problematic process, and GWR, the 'Merican supplier will not ship directly to consumers outside of the US, Mania basically had to order a heap of them, the colour choice was silver, or red, and we all know anything red adds 5 killerwasps of dynotorques..... Whilst it does fit over a 2.5, and I've seen a few photos and videos of it being installed and fitting, google also says it might get real close to the FAB9 intake front runner, people in the US says it does fit with the FAB9 intake, except for one person who said it slightly touched.......so there is that.....LOL..... As it seems that I am the first in AU to have this combination of parts there's no local knowledge about fitment, so I'm just a willing guinea pig in this endeavour, I'll cross my fingers and toes and hope for the best In other news, I ordered stuff from China  on the same day I ordered the 23° silicone bend from Victoria, the stuff from China arrived a day ago, the 23° silicone bend is still travelling around Australia thanks to Australia Post, and "may" be here next week
    • Very good news...I contacted Racebox about it last night. My car is a 2016 so remains to be seen if it is compatible, requires a TCU swap, or is impossible.
×
×
  • Create New...