Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

aren't you the goose a month ago came on saying you wanted to buy a turbo and your dad didnt want you to but he could go and get ^%#$%%^ and you mum was cool.... well we all now remember the storey

pretty sure that was you, bit of a spanner1.jpg

for those that cant put 2 and 2 together its a tool

EDIT

>>see his original thread<<

remember now we all told you buy NA to listen to your old man

LOL HAHAHA very funny i want something with a bit of style i want to spend about 7-10k maybe a bit over, my mum is fine with the car thing its just my dad he dosent want me getting something with a turbo but F*** what he says.... :D

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/17...45#entry3740945

:(:(

:nyaanyaa:

aren't you the goose a month ago came on saying you wanted to buy a turbo and your dad didnt want you to but he could go and get ^%#$%%^ and you mum was cool.... well we all now remember the storey

>>see his original thread<<

remember now we all told you buy NA to listen to your old man

lol, that was a painful 10 pages.....lost count how many times Pepsinator had to edit the crap out of his posts.

Just buy a F#@ked turbo for stuff all, and slap it on the kitchen table while the old mans having breakfast and say "fine you stupid balding old man, heres my stinking turbo, Its not in my car anymore"

Prob dont do that, cos you'll still speed and get more tickets and then you'll be living on the streets..........

Just buy a F#@ked turbo for stuff all, and slap it on the kitchen table while the old mans having breakfast and say "fine you stupid balding old man, heres my stinking turbo, Its not in my car anymore"

Prob dont do that, cos you'll still speed and get more tickets and then you'll be living on the streets..........

yeah and then you'll be busking Cat Steven & Glen Campbell songs in the Rundle Mall :P

lol stick a tennis ball under the throttle pedal so ya cant press it down as far lol

Hahahahaha thats gold..... or maybe amputate the right foot at the ankle!!

f*ck me im the opposite to you mate, no boost makes homer go crazy, oww and fellas shaun at boost works says that n/a loves being turboed. he estimates it will make 269kw atws when done thats if i get it done cause im a wally.

he estimates it will make 269kw atws when done thats if i get it done cause im a wally.

not without a lot of support mods. You will need injectors and fuel pump added to your list (as well as FMIC and ECU) to get those figures. Easier to start off with an RB26 front cut in that case

4 door sleeper and others have a read and tell me what you think would work out cheaper in the end apart from selling the car(which in a year may be an option to go gtr)

The N/a engine will respond well to turbo charging, The ideal way is to do it with aftermarket engine management that way the comp ratio of the engine wont be an issue until poss 16 odd pound boost is desired on ult 98, The way to go to be cost effective would be running std cast manifold, hi flo turbo, front mount cooler exhaust, and then injectors and engine management, You will spend prob around $ 8500- 9000.00 to get this to come together but you will have around 270 kw at the wheels, An engine transplant with front mount cooler and exhaust will be around the $ 6500.00 and will deliver approx 190kw at the wheels, all s/hand turb etc

Hope this helps your decision making

Cheers shaun

oww and the tennis ball under the celi, takes gold

but at least that 8500-9000$$ can be done in stages if you know what i mean

so get standard manifold few hundred with standard turbo and standard ecu run low boost untill the next round of mods can be afforded

thats my opinion

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...