Jump to content
SAU Community

Too Big Of A File

GTR32X

By GTR32X,
in Photography

 Share

Recommended Posts

GTR32X Experienced

GTR32X

Posted
  • Author
Posted
what format is it?

save it as a jpeg and it will result in a dramatically smaller file size, with almost no loss of quality

They are saved as a Jpeg file already

I just went and checked

I have already uploaded the files to my computer.

So i dont know what to do. Im not that good with computers and so forth.

adam-__- Grand Master

adam-__-

Posted
Posted

I don't know how others do it, but I just right click the image you want to resize, edit, it will open up in MS Paint, then go to the top drop down box thingy and click "image", then "stretch/skew", then just type in a percentage of what you want left of the original image in both the horizontal and vertical, then "ok".

If you end up resizing it too much, just press, "ctrl" and "z" at the same time to redo.

I'm the biggest computer noob I know, so if there's a better way of resizing images, let me know. hahaha

babyskyline Grand Master

babyskyline

Posted
Posted
I don't know how others do it, but I just right click the image you want to resize, edit, it will open up in MS Paint, then go to the top drop down box thingy and click "image", then "stretch/skew", then just type in a percentage of what you want left of the original image in both the horizontal and vertical, then "ok".

If you end up resizing it too much, just press, "ctrl" and "z" at the same time to redo.

I'm the biggest computer noob I know, so if there's a better way of resizing images, let me know. hahaha

Thats what i do a well. Seems easy and simple and doesnt seem to do anything to the quality of the image.

R34NRG Grand Master

R34NRG

Posted
Posted
go to www.photobucket.com

create an account

upload the picture it will resize it for you.

imageshack > photobucket

http://www.imageshack.us/

:D

I'm the biggest computer noob I know, so if there's a better way of resizing images, let me know. hahaha

always ALWAYS have a copy of Photoshop handy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • turbo76lx
      Torana Lx Gtr Hatch, Lots Of Pictures

      By turbo76lx · Posted

      Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • rahilp
      Requirements for Xenon Headlights? (Possible Solution)

      By rahilp · Posted

      Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • r32-25t
      R32 Gtr Long Term Love, Now Project

      By r32-25t · Posted

      Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • ARB26
      Stagea 260RS seats

      By ARB26 · Posted

      Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • Lithium
      Forced Performance Hta Turbos

      By Lithium · Posted

      I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...