Jump to content
SAU Community

Who's Got Pitbikes Or Dirtbikes?

RubyRS4

By RubyRS4,
in South Australia

 Share

Recommended Posts

RubyRS4 Grand Master

RubyRS4

Posted
Posted

The weather is turning to shit. Dirt turns to mud. Who's got a dirt bike they wanna get dirty? :blink:

I'm just curious to see who's got a pitbike/dirtbike and maybe we could put a day together to go riding on a track! Maybe end of June sometime? If I can pick the track, I'd chose Sellick's Hill. Love that track and come to grief many times. :P

Thoughts? :laugh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221239-whos-got-pitbikes-or-dirtbikes/
Share on other sites
RubyRS4 Grand Master

RubyRS4

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sellicks Hill is a good track too ... if it hasn't been hacked by the f**kwits with no idea that go there with shovels! Seriously, I hate the wankers who turn up with their shit chinese crap, hack up a decent jump with shovels for their own amusement, go over that jump a few times (for a whole of one half hour!), then go home when they hurt themselves or get bored or get the poser pics that want! Only to f**k up the a section of track me and my mates are tearing around for half the day on!

Got some decent jumps that'll test your manhood :P Its alot of fun too in winter when it gets greasy and you can 'drift' everywhere :banana:

RubyRS4 Grand Master

RubyRS4

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Where's this track of yours kidafa?

Sellicks Hill is definately not a beginners track. Your little track there looks good for practicing a decent jump. Got a shovel? Bobcat? We could throw in a few more 'challenges'! :woot:

skyhighR33 Community Regular

skyhighR33

Posted
Posted

man i wish i didn't give up my kx she was great for hitting freestyle ramps and stuff the longest jump ive done is 96ft at the motorcross track up here. thats pretty big but compared to the ramp for the first time was a little less scary.lol and i used to jump freestyle ramps on a 1984 xlx250.

RubyRS4 Grand Master

RubyRS4

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Track is very close to our lunch point on the cruise ruby :P

Id personally say sellicks is a beginners track...

The benched section of the track can be, but if you use the jumps that run off then back onto the track its not :happy: Then again, me and my mates run around the easier section in 3rd pinned to the stop.

For those not familiar with the track, the pic shows some of the track in the background:

reubenjump01.jpg

Found the only vid I can find of one of the jumps:

http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v129/Reu...eubenjump03.flv

And heres a pic of the Honda Sobe (with 140cc Lifan motor) that we broke on one of the jumps. Don't mind my mate, he's still out cold from the crash :ermm:

reuben002.jpg

dangerman4 Mentor

dangerman4

Posted
Posted

its amusing how a lot of you are keen as to ride at selicks and sound like youve done it hundreds of times.

i assume you all know its private land? and therfore you have all been trespassing?

the land is currently for sale, but as its hills face zone it would be hard to set up a ligit bike track as the greenies wouldnt allow it.

dam you greenies.....

piss of to tasmania, where its green all year round... lol

RubyRS4 Grand Master

RubyRS4

Posted
  • Author
Posted
its amusing how a lot of you are keen as to ride at selicks and sound like youve done it hundreds of times.

i assume you all know its private land? and therfore you have all been trespassing?

the land is currently for sale, but as its hills face zone it would be hard to set up a ligit bike track as the greenies wouldnt allow it.

dam you greenies.....

piss of to tasmania, where its green all year round... lol

The track at Sellicks Hill is Crown land. Cops have been out there a few times and have no problem with us there.

Dirt bikers have been going there for many years with no problems with any authority. And 'yes' Council is tolerant of this because there is no impact on the environment or wildlife or any residents.

That land is not currently for sale and won't be in the near future. If you've seen the land you'd understand why.

dangerman4 Mentor

dangerman4

Posted
Posted

sorry for pointing out the fact that your wrong,

but here is the link to the land in question,

i have looked into purchasing it to create a motorbike adventure park etc but im having issues getting past the hills face zoning requiremnents with council. be warned it is private land.

http://www.domain.com.au/Public/PropertyDe...did=2006645866#

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • GTSBoy
      DeAgostini 1/8 scale BNR32 Nissan Skyline GT-R Nismo

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's hilariously putrid!
    • GTSBoy
      R33 Fuel Pump & Brakes after alarm swap

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...