Jump to content
SAU Community

Error Code 21 On Bnr34

Alecci

By Alecci,
in General Maintenance

 Share

Recommended Posts

Alecci Apprentice

Alecci

Posted
Posted

I've been rebuilding my R34 GTR following a crash during a track event some two years ago.

I've modified most of the engine, basically only leaving the bottom end standard.

For a complete spec list, please visit this link and scroll down below the pictures. All parts used are brand new.

For some time now we've been trying to start the car. We've run diagnostics on it and gotten some error codes, and we've managed to sort them all out except for code 21 (primary ignition signal).

I've searched the forums for other threads describing the same problem, and while the search turned up a lot of results for error code 21, none of the threads has dealt with problems such as mine (i.e. the car will not start at all).

We have spark on all cylinders, and we have fuel going into the engine. Ignition angle is 16 degrees. The starter turns over quickly and the car sounds like it wants to start, but the closest thing to a running engine we've achieved is a lot of back-firing in the exhaust.

I'm a real newbie when it comes to troubleshooting cars and fixing problems, but my guess is that one of the following are broken or not functioning properly:

- cam-angle sensor

- coilpacks

- AFM's

Any thoughts? I've posted this question on a number of other forums, but I don't seem to get any help. Having spent the last 2 years rebuilding the car, whereof the last 2 months just trying to get it started, I'm close to losing heart and taking a sledgehammer to the car in order to smash it just for the sheer satisfaction of the act. Help is desperatly needed!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221889-error-code-21-on-bnr34/
Share on other sites
GeeTR Grand Master

GeeTR

Posted
Posted

I checked the link, nice setup man, looks smooth :blink:

If its complaining about the primary ignition signal, Id assume that to mean the CAS isn't behaving correctly. I'm not too familiar with RB26 CAS's, but id assume its a photodiode and chopper disk setup. 360 (=20) home slots and 6 trigger slots. If "Primary Ignition Signal" isnt refering to the whole CAS, maybe just one of those ouputs is broken, as i didnt think a RB would even fire without a CAS. I guess the obvious question is, have you tried a different CAS?

I'm just just thinking aloud here :(

GoodLuck

Alecci Apprentice

Alecci

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I checked the link, nice setup man, looks smooth :(

If its complaining about the primary ignition signal, Id assume that to mean the CAS isn't behaving correctly. I'm not too familiar with RB26 CAS's, but id assume its a photodiode and chopper disk setup. 360 (=20) home slots and 6 trigger slots. If "Primary Ignition Signal" isnt refering to the whole CAS, maybe just one of those ouputs is broken, as i didnt think a RB would even fire without a CAS. I guess the obvious question is, have you tried a different CAS?

I'm just just thinking aloud here :D

GoodLuck

Hi mate,

I don't have any clue whatsoever as to how the CAS is constructed, nor in which ways it could be broken to the point where the car will not start.

I've not had nor will have any chance of trying a different CAS. There's only about 12 BNR34's in Sweden altogether, and none of them are close to where I live. Being a delicate, rather expensive and crucial component of the engine there's no way I can borrow one either.

The same thing, of course, goes for the coilpacks.

Being a bit low on funds after spending some money on the rebuild of the car, I'd hate buying new stuff that's not really needed.

Many thanks for your reply, I really appreciate it.

Cheers!

blind_elk Grand Master

blind_elk

Posted
Posted

Error codes in Nissan ECUs are persistent, ie they "hang around" for something like 50 start cycles. Try clearing (resetting) the ECU, see if you still have the error code.

If you have spark, then the CAS is working correctly. That also rules out the coil packs. And most engines will start without an AFM.

Do you have fuel "going into the engine" because you have fuel at the rail, or because you have seen the injectors working?

Are you sure the cams are set correctly? You had the crank at TDC when you assembled the cambelt?

Alecci Apprentice

Alecci

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Error codes in Nissan ECUs are persistent, ie they "hang around" for something like 50 start cycles. Try clearing (resetting) the ECU, see if you still have the error code.

If you have spark, then the CAS is working correctly. That also rules out the coil packs. And most engines will start without an AFM.

Do you have fuel "going into the engine" because you have fuel at the rail, or because you have seen the injectors working?

Are you sure the cams are set correctly? You had the crank at TDC when you assembled the cambelt?

Diagnostics tool and ECU has been reset/cleared between starts. We also removed the cable to the CAS, and then we would only get error code 11 (cam angle sensor). When CAS was reconnected, we once again only get error code 21.

Fuel is going into the cylinders, the spark plugs got very wet prior to lowering the fuel pressure. The injectors still open 8.0 ms when cranking the engine, some people guess the reason for that is choke (fuel enrichment for cold starts). Fuel is still going into the cylinders after lowering the fuel pressure. If I'm not mistaken, the car would not be back-firing if there's no fuel present?

Crank was at TDC and we double, triple and quadruple checked the position of the cams prior to assembing the cambelt.

GeeTR Grand Master

GeeTR

Posted
Posted (edited)

The fact its spitting code 11 when the CAS isn't present, and a 21 when it is... I got my money on the CAS. Have you got access to a oscilloscope to check its output maybe? Could the loom be damaged between CAS and ECU?

Edited by GeeTR
Alecci Apprentice

Alecci

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The fact its spitting code 11 when the CAS isn't present, and a 21 when it is... I got my money on the CAS. Have you got access to a oscilloscope to check its output maybe? Could the loom be damaged between CAS and ECU?

Just like you said, the fact that a non-present CAS gives code 11 and a present one gives code 21 is what also made me suspect that it may be the CAS that's malfunctioning. Otherwise I think the first error code would still show up, right?

The wiring could be damaged I guess, but it's nothing that meets the eye at least.

I'll check access to an oscilloscope.

I'm very grateful for your input!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • funkymonkey
      Jacks that fit under GTR lips that can reach the subframe?

      By funkymonkey · Posted

      I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • Duncan
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Duncan · Posted

      You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...