Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey ya'll

can someone please take a photo of their R33 boot latch and boot locking mechanism

mine is cactus again and needs to be "re-fixed" by bending it the correct way

we did it last time at the grand prix (thanks scott) but i cant remember what was wrong

if someone can please post up some pics of their 33 boot latch and locking thingy, that would be ace

heres what mine looks like

Image038.jpg

Image039.jpg

Image040.jpg

Image041.jpg

Image042.jpg

:thumbsup:

:blush:

Mine stopped working for a bit. There is a little latch along the back wall of the boot. I was told to flick that up by a friend, and then it worked after that, dont know if its a similar issue.

I can't tell what I'm supposed to be looking at in your photos, but how does someone bend their boot lock mechanism?

There is a little latch along the back wall of the boot. I was told to flick that up by a friend, and then it worked after that, dont know if its a similar issue.

The 'little latch' is there to disable the boot being opened via the lever in the cabin.

I can't tell what I'm supposed to be looking at in your photos, but how does someone bend their boot lock mechanism?

The 'little latch' is there to disable the boot being opened via the lever in the cabin.

Yeah, I wasnt aware of that for a while. Thought the cable had snapped or something. Spent a month opening the boot using the key all the time.

just bend it back abit the lock mechanisim, till it locks properly thats what i did to mien also adjusted the bottom also by bending it also its easy simple fix unless hold thing is stuffed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...