Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have a R33 GTS25, currently it has K & N airfilter, extractors, and a 2.5" exhaust system. Currently I'm looking into enlarging the factory throttle body.

I'm haven't managed to find any one that has done it to there GTS25.

Have any of you guys/girls experimented with enlarging the throttle body?

Anyone know what sort of gains you could expect to get with a bigger throttle body?

Would enlarging the throttle body be likely to cause any problems?

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22222-throttle-body-questions/
Share on other sites

if u enlarge the throttle body u should also enlarge everything else from filter back to suit it. making it bigger allows more air flow and most likely leaner mixture (more KW) the airflow meter will adjust timing etc. prolly to its best cos of the good airflow. Try it man, lots of V8's and V6's usually do that as an upgrade. however im thinking 6 throttle bodies ;)

larger everything mite change the "volumetric efficiency", i think thats what its called.

In other terms, you mite find that you lose a bit or lower end torque, but gain more top end, pending on the changes you make.

Though i would LOVE to see 6 throttle barrels of the side of an RB25DE !

there is a place in melbourne i believe from melbourne, back in the day when i had my vl, that had an exchange program for like 300 hundred bucks for a bigger throttle body and they claimed it gave 30% more power, dont know if it fits ours or is relevant, but there are plenty of places that would be able to enlarge ours and make a new butterfly.

Thanks for the info guys,

I like the idea of multiple throttle bodies, but unfortunatly my pockets aren't that deep, and I've heard that they are difficult to tune, but if done properly can give you large gains.

So it would be a worth while mod to do.

Any body know what the T/B can be bored out to?

Multiple throttle bodies only give you better throttle response, not more power. If you think about it, when the throttle is fully open it does not really matter where it is located. At full throttle all you want is a big open hole for the air to pour through.

It is true that any decent racing engine has multiple throttle bodies as close to the valves as possible, but they are not there for power. Actually the reverse is true. Multiple throttle bodies can never be larger than the intake runner size, but a single throttle body can be as large as you want to make it.

If all you want is maximum steady state dyno horsepower, a single large throttle body is the way to go. In Japan The fastest drag racers all chuck the multi throttle bodies, and fit a single large throttle body on their GTRs for that very reason.

But suppose you wanted to drive a formula one car around a wet race track on the absolute limit of adhesion. A single throttle body would be undrivable.

Ever hear those things revving the engine in the pits? The rate the RPM rises and falls is unreal. No formula one driver would ever want to hear about a sluggish big horsepower single throttle body engine.

Now some guys like the sound that six open trumpets make at full throttle, and that is another thing entirely. You only have to figure out a way to run it with a MAP sensor instead of an airflow meter. And how the lack of an aircleaner is going to quickly destroy your engine.

But if you want to spend a few thousand to get that great induction sound, and do not really care about the minimal extra power gain, or reduced engine life, then go to it.

Thanks, so I guess what people have told me in the past was not quite the truth.

Any way Multiple throttle bodies are out of the question for me, I have to be careful what I do, for insurance reason.

I have had a quote for getting my T/B enlarged for around $500, so basicaly I am wanting to know if it would be a worth while modification to make or would I be wasting my hard earned $?

  • 2 weeks later...

I wouldn't recomend upgrading the throttle body untill you've at least fitted a larger lift/duration cam and had some port work done. All of which will will yield better power gains for the money spent. Only once you reach the limits of the factory throttle body should you think about changing it, any earlier and sluggish response and erratic behaviour will result.

Like Warpspeed said, multiples are only usefull for hard tuned engines that need very controlled thottle positions. And they cost a bucket, try $2500 for an RB,SR or L-series 6 version.

http://www.commsport.com.au/prod152.htm

thats it from commsport sorry i was going from memory its not 30 percent power gain but still conciderable, max before was 129rwhp and with the TB its 153rwhp

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
×
×
  • Create New...