Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ITB just like an M3 lol.

From my experiance with NA. ITB will let the car breath a lot better but you can stop there. How far are you going, are you doing cams exhaust computer?

Results will be interesting

I would love to see the head built to raise your redline up^^

i recken you need to bump up the compression more, run a e30 fuel.

im not sure if the rally side of motorsport is allowed to run ethenol fuel yet. i know its been approved for general motorsport use.

although you then possibly want to play around more with your extractors and look at throttle postion ajustable trumpets. and some form of a ducted cold air box. im still waiting for you to come down to wellington with your crazy setup.

the link has the ability to be tuned via tps for setups like this, the newer g4 link is even better with sequencial injecton. on turbo cars it has 4d mapping, so you can tune it to make full boost on 20% throttle if you wanted.

Hey Geoff, I was halfway to Welly yesterday racing in forestry north of Taupo. Looks like I was 2nd 2WD so I'm happy with that.

The car is running a G4 Link, planed and ported head, cams with adjustable gears. The motor is going pretty strong at the moment, but there is more in it yet. We're doing away with the brake booster soon so I can run bigger trumpets so we can dial in more duration on the cams and get rid of the reverberation out the intake.

I run it on 98 cause it's easy to get from any BP and stick to that. We've changed the exhaust a few times and the current system seems to be the goods.

The G4 is tuned just off the tps at the mo, because we can't get enough vacuum off the itb's with the cam overlap.

It's something different and turns heads wherever I race it. Surprises a few the fact that we've got it working so good on the gravel.

sliidetaslo21.jpg

shane i was talking to a guy that builds quite a few race engines, you may of heard of him, mark maholland.

and the topic of itbs on na came up,

he was telling me about how he built for some race car, i can't rember now, it was ajustiable trumpets with vacume operated valves,

so say if you planted boot the trumpt, chamber drops right down, as soon as you back off it snaps backup.

not the easyest system to explain.

apparantly a couple years later they started using it on f1 cars.

he was also telling me that if you spent a bit of time developing the intake system you could actually build boost, yes boost with out a turbo. its all to do with capturing the sound waves and getting it to go all towards the trumpets at the right time.

it was a rather interesting conversation i must say, brought up some rather interesting ideas. all bought up by the suzuki g13b offroad racer we were tuning for the taupo 1000km race.

good to hear its all running well and your doing well, good to see you also got a g4 link, there an awesome piece of gear.

he was also telling me that if you spent a bit of time developing the intake system you could actually build boost, yes boost with out a turbo. its all to do with capturing the sound waves and getting it to go all towards the trumpets at the right time.

it was a rather interesting conversation i must say, brought up some rather interesting ideas

Helmholtz resonance tuning shouldn't be a new idea really for anyone exploring using ITBs or any serious NA tuning really, the whole idea behind going to ITBs is to redefine the intake runner resonance and use that to maximise throttle response and torque across the utilised rev range. Such tuning is also what good exhaust design is all about :-)

Yeah I've heard of Mark. I'm quite lucky really, my Dad builds race motors, from rotary's to chevs and now an RB, been doing it for about 30 - 40 years now.

Variable length intakes would be ideal, but I'm not going down that track. 100% perfect tune at every throttle percentage isn't required on a loose surface like gravel, plus it's just another thing to go wrong. Part of what we are doing with the new trumpet design will effectively create boost, but I'm not plumbing in an intercooler just yet!

Right on the money there Lithium.

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...