Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ok. i've checked out both the original power graph and the new one. even on the old graph the car still wasn't running lean. i think its amazing that all you armchair mechanics can pass all these comments without even seeing the car or working on it to know what its doin and what power its making in relation to air/fuel and boost pressure. maybe you guys hould think less about how much boost pressure its making and be more concerned about the power output!!!!!

ok. i've checked out both the original power graph and the new one. even on the old graph the car still wasn't running lean. i think its amazing that all you armchair mechanics can pass all these comments without even seeing the car or working on it to know what its doin and what power its making in relation to air/fuel and boost pressure. maybe you guys hould think less about how much boost pressure its making and be more concerned about the power output!!!!!

i have to agree with cooldude! how can you no what that particular engine needs from your computer seats?

Attack of the noobs. How many cars have you personally dyno tuned from base tune? FYI when you are tuning a car, you basically dont look at the power output, whatever it makes, it makes. If its down 50kw at the end, its either mechanical or the tune.

what exactly is a 'noob'? or are you just guessing that its a word just like you are guessing about what the tune for this car should be. its pretty easy for all you guys to hang shit on people for doing their job when its possible you wouldn't know one end of spanner from the other

i hope you have more then 700hp at the rear wheels?
.

yeah just a little under 900 at all four wheels and losing traction. how bout yourself? :)

oh and cooldude1000...the spanner you need at the momment is a size suitable for you.....6 millimeter au't to do it...it'll have to do cause i dont have one smaller that you can borrow. .........noob.

Edited by nizmonut
what exactly is a 'noob'? or are you just guessing that its a word just like you are guessing about what the tune for this car should be. its pretty easy for all you guys to hang shit on people for doing their job when its possible you wouldn't know one end of spanner from the other

I know your a spanner.. does that count?

.

yeah just a little under 900 at all four wheels and losing traction. how bout yourself? :)

oh and cooldude1000...the spanner you need at the momment is a size suitable for you.....6 millimeter au't to do it...it'll have to do cause i dont have one smaller that you can borrow. .........noob.

WHOW!! you should be really proud of yourself you actually no ther is a 6mill spanner nice work, you must be a mechanic i wouldnt hang shit for all you no he might be a dyno tuner!!!

Who cares if he is? I wouldn't take my car too him based on his comments below

ok. i've checked out both the original power graph and the new one. even on the old graph the car still wasn't running lean. i think its amazing that all you armchair mechanics can pass all these comments without even seeing the car or working on it to know what its doin and what power its making in relation to air/fuel and boost pressure. maybe you guys hould think less about how much boost pressure its making and be more concerned about the power output!!!!!

Go look at the comments, and by whom they are posted. People with a substantial more than armchair experience.

Some have tuned cars with over 300rwkw from scratch, some full engine builds, some full engine conversions and so on.

If you try and say that first graph, the car isn't running lean with a AFR of 14.25:1, then you sir are an nothing more than a fool

Posts in this thread are about the poor AFR ratio and the average midrange that is associated with it, that is directly correlated to boost control issues or something else as it has a fairly wonky dip in there that should not be there.

Who cares if he is? I wouldn't take my car too him based on his comments below

Go look at the comments, and by whom they are posted. People with a substantial more than armchair experience.

Some have tuned cars with over 300rwkw from scratch, some full engine builds, some full engine conversions and so on.

If you try and say that first graph, the car isn't running lean with a AFR of 14.25:1, then you sir are an nothing more than a fool

Posts in this thread are about the poor AFR ratio and the average midrange that is associated with it, that is directly correlated to boost control issues or something else as it has a fairly wonky dip in there that should not be there.

lol

dear dick face look up what the stockometric air fuel ratio is for a stock engine is!! you must be the f**k wit that owns a black car that dosent show up particulate matter(hydrocarbons) which is unburnt fuel!!! all over you bumper bar.

its obvious that you want to be running a richer than stoich when your producing bulk power but the numbers these guys are talking about are ridiculous. these guys still need to find out what the stoich afr is and then go and re-check your figures and then maybe you can pull your dicks out of each others asses finally

This thread has become immensely entertaining :)

These are my fav bits... completely nonsensical...

dear dick face look up what the stockometric air fuel ratio is for a stock engine is!!
...these guys still need to find out what the stoich afr is and then go and re-check your figures...

Really, the best bit, is one guy with 3 posts, agreeing with another 3 poster... both of which joined 1 day apart... *cough* IP check

i have to agree with cooldude!
Edited by GeeTR
its obvious that you want to be running a richer than stoich when your producing bulk power but the numbers these guys are talking about are ridiculous. these guys still need to find out what the stoich afr is and then go and re-check your figures and then maybe you can pull your dicks out of each others asses finally

cooldude/paintman... Why do you feel the need to make personal attacks?

Peak torque is made as the afr's spike to 14:1. Not good.

Simple as that.

So pull your head in and discuss not attack.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...