Jump to content
SAU Community

The Battle For Japanese Supercar Stardom Begins Anew


Recommended Posts

stock for stock

the nsx has always been better than the gtr.

dont believe me go into youtube and search for best motoring;

once you start modding cars that is a different story

edit:

R34 GTR V's NSX-R 1/4 mile

Edited by [Michael]
  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

nice... 12.8sec nsxr very nasty :P

but if straight is all u wanna talk about.. then the r34 isnt the fastest gtr anyhow.. that "new" nsx would get eaten up by the old r32 gtr... theres a guy here who has run 12.4 with his STOCK gtr

i forgot his nick, but i could find it :P

nice... 12.8sec nsxr very nasty :P

but if straight is all u wanna talk about.. then the r34 isnt the fastest gtr anyhow.. that "new" nsx would get eaten up by the old r32 gtr... theres a guy here who has run 12.4 with his STOCK gtr

i forgot his nick, but i could find it :P

that was the 1st clip i found...

there are many more of the nsx handing it to the gtr on the round tracks

and vise versa :P

but like i said to the other dude..

the gtr when it raced against production cars, won every single time

and thus killed production car racing

the nsx didnt win a single race

Honda's philosophy since the early 80's was that they will never use turbo charging in their road cars, because back then turbo charged cars were unreliable. I wonder if this philosophy of theirs is going to come back and bite them.

I doubt it. Compared to its Japanese brethren, it differentiates them.

Most of the fast Euro supercars are NA (Enzo, Carrera GT, Zonda, etc) and they're still quick. The Nurburgring "production car" (and I use the term very loosely) record holder is a NA track day special.

It works for them. I'm more disappointed with the new NSX's front/mid engined AWDness than its lack of turbos.

They say that racing improves the breed but one thing i could never understand about Honda was that they spent so much time and money on Development on Turbos for F1 but didnt touch it with a 10 ft pole for the road cars......very odd

nice... 12.8sec nsxr very nasty :)

but if straight is all u wanna talk about.. then the r34 isnt the fastest gtr anyhow.. that "new" nsx would get eaten up by the old r32 gtr... theres a guy here who has run 12.4 with his STOCK gtr

i forgot his nick, but i could find it :down:

This NSX is quicker than the R35.

gorgeous cars... i love the nsx... that one is about as quick as my gtr was lol

beautiful cars thou :)

the new one is going to be an animal because its going straight to the gtr...

what a monster the new one will be :down: i love it when companies to head to head

stock for stock

the nsx has always been better than the gtr.

dont believe me go into youtube and search for best motoring;

once you start modding cars that is a different story

edit:

R34 GTR V's NSX-R 1/4 mile

Not true. The R34 N1 will destroy the NSX in the quarter. It makes something like 420Hp stock from the factory. And i haven't even mentioned the Z-tune R34 yet (which is stock from the factory as well).

Yes the S2000 and the NSX is RWD, but they are not in production anymore. I am talking about current production Honda's.

Edited by skyline_man
Not true. The R34 N1 will destroy the NSX in the quarter. It makes something like 420Hp stock from the factory. And i haven't even mentioned the Z-tune R34 yet (which is stock from the factory as well).

Yes the S2000 and the NSX is RWD, but they are not in production anymore. I am talking about current production Honda's.

you fail the n1 did not have 420hp from stock

the z-tune is a limited edition made by nismo, comparing two different cars there

again the video i posted was purely to make a point.

Edited by [Michael]
Not true. The R34 N1 will destroy the NSX in the quarter. It makes something like 420Hp stock from the factory. And i haven't even mentioned the Z-tune R34 yet (which is stock from the factory as well).

Yes the S2000 and the NSX is RWD, but they are not in production anymore. I am talking about current production Honda's.

Wtf? Double fail on the S2000!

The S2000 is still in production.

The Ztune R34 is NOT STOCK. Its a heavily modified factory special. "Stock" is a car that was built to original factory specs on the original platform and like Michael said, stock for stock the NSX has the GTR covered.

GTR is not God, my friend.

Im not talking about when the cars are modified and that has never been my point.

Oh and your double post on not knowing about the S2000 calls for a hot steamy little serving of

failredo-49.jpg

Oh and the N1, forget it - Sif that's even relevant in this discussion...and the Z-tune even less so.

Courtesy of teh Wiki:

"Only 45 R34 N1 models were produced from the factory, 12 of which were used by Nismo for Super Taikyu racing. The rest were sold to various customers, mostly racing teams, and tuning garages."

you won't find a single Honda that is rear wheel drive
S2000 :whistling:
NSX?

Owned x 1

The R34 N1 will destroy the NSX in the quarter. It makes something like 420Hp stock from the factory.

you fail the n1 did not have 420hp from stock

Owned x 2

Owned, owned, owned!1!k!! Give up while you're behind :P

I'm more disappointed with the new NSX's front/mid engined AWDness than its lack of turbos.

Yes, yes Honda realised their beautiful NSX was a total commercial flop and to make the new one practical have freed up cabin space by front/mid-mounting the motor and giving it plenty of grip with AWD, to cater for wealthy buyers that curl into a ball and cry when the tyres chirp.

Honda tried to be exotic and stand out with the old NSX, but they've given up. Nissan have never hidden the GTR was an all-rounder. They only hid its performance figures :D

The new NSX smacks of dirty, dirty daily driver to me :D

Edited by R338OY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...