Jump to content
SAU Community

Unusual Camber Setup? -1.5 Degree Front 0 Degree Rear


Recommended Posts

Guest qtvinsta

Hi all,

Now i just got a wheel alignment done and feel the person who did it may have been fibbing... was it a waste of my money?

background:

I drive a r34 gt-t which had tein flex coilovers installed and car lowered roughly an inch and a half. Now after having this setup for over 3 years i've had enough of the rear wheels wearing out on the inside faster. The front wheels seem to wear more evenly though the inside is probably only slightly more worn but not as bad as the rear.

Two week ago I installed a pair of jjr adjustable rear upper arms and on the weekend put 2 new rear tires.

I thought i'd now get the rear wheels adjusted to have less negative camber.... simple enough thought...

I've just taken to this tyre place (they've been good to me in the past, so i won't mention which one) and all i wanted was to reduce the negative camber in the rear... they said i must align the front too, which i agreed too...

In the end, only the front wheels had adjustments made and the rear wheels were untouched... after requesting the rear to be adjusted and getting resistance i gave up... the mechanic said that the rear was perfect the way it was and that if I wanted it adjusted then i need to have install adjustable front camber too to adjust the rear...

Actually i think i just answered my own question... I couldn't make any sense of what the mechanic said (i realised when I was trying to explain it in the paragraph above!)

I'm quite certain it was probably because the mechanic just feed me some BS to get out of doing more work.

Anyways, that's the reason for the topic title... is it unusal to have a bit of negative camber up front and 0 camber or close to it in the rear?

Any comments? Any recommended place where I can get my rear camber adjusted properly? anywhere between Strathfield and Liverpool is fine with me and surrounding suburbs.

Thanks,

Edited by qtvinsta

Not at all. quite a reasonable setup for a street car imo. I run around 2.5 degrees on the front and 1 on the rear. (both negative) my car does see trackworkand i couldnt be bothered getting an alignment every time i do it. If it wasnt quite so aggressive i would run heaps more but premature wear on the road deters me from doing it.

Guest qtvinsta

yeah I didn't think so either. No need to have the front and rear matching cambers.

Now that I know, I will be able to argue if this happens again...

Question now is whether or not to bring the car back to the same place to get the rear camber adjusted like I had wanted in the first place.

Also complain to the boss about his lazy mechanic. Hopefully not have to pay a second time for something that should have been done already

Maybe just forget them and take it to a reputable place like pedders.

any other reputable places that have experience with adjusting camber kits ?

Hi all,

Now i just got a wheel alignment done and feel the person who did it may have been fibbing... was it a waste of my money?

background:

I drive a r34 gt-t which had tein flex coilovers installed and car lowered roughly an inch and a half. Now after having this setup for over 3 years i've had enough of the rear wheels wearing out on the inside faster. The front wheels seem to wear more evenly though the inside is probably only slightly more worn but not as bad as the rear.

Two week ago I installed a pair of jjr adjustable rear upper arms and on the weekend put 2 new rear tires.

I thought i'd now get the rear wheels adjusted to have less negative camber.... simple enough thought...

I've just taken to this tyre place (they've been good to me in the past, so i won't mention which one) and all i wanted was to reduce the negative camber in the rear... they said i must align the front too, which i agreed too...

In the end, only the front wheels had adjustments made and the rear wheels were untouched... after requesting the rear to be adjusted and getting resistance i gave up... the mechanic said that the rear was perfect the way it was and that if I wanted it adjusted then i need to have install adjustable front camber too to adjust the rear...

Actually i think i just answered my own question... I couldn't make any sense of what the mechanic said (i realised when I was trying to explain it in the paragraph above!)

I'm quite certain it was probably because the mechanic just feed me some BS to get out of doing more work.

Anyways, that's the reason for the topic title... is it unusal to have a bit of negative camber up front and 0 camber or close to it in the rear?

Any comments? Any recommended place where I can get my rear camber adjusted properly? anywhere between Strathfield and Liverpool is fine with me and surrounding suburbs.

Thanks,

Well lets start with the technical stuff;

1. There is no one single right alignment settings for every R34GTT. It depends on what you do with the car, how you drive it, how much power it has, what other suspension modifications it has, what height it is, what tyres etc etc. A simple example, if you use it on the track then 2.5 degrees of negative camber is probably OK on the rear, but if you drive to work on a freeway every day then around 0.75 degrees is better for tyre wear, but if you use it at the drags then you need around 0.5 degrees positive camber. Without sufficient detail no one can tell you what alignment settings you should use.

2. Without the current alignment settings, no one can tell you which direction to go in adjustments. So what are they?

3. Changing only the rear upper control arms is a not a good solution technically speaking, you should adjust the traction arms in tandem with the upper control arms, otherwise you end up with undesireable bump steer (not that any bump steer is ever desireable in a performance car). Maybe that's what the alignment guy was trying to tell you?

4. "lowered roughly an inch and a half", lowered from what? When they role out of the factory they are 390 mm front and 380 mm (centre of wheel to guard). After 1,000 k's or so they settle at 385/375. After 60,000 k's or so they are usually at 380/370. By that time the standard shocks will be stuffed and if they aren't replaced the springs wear out faster and so the car will drop to around 375/365 fairly quickly. So if you are 1.5" (~40mm) lower then you could be at 340/330, which is actually 50 mm (2") lower than when it was new.

There is only one answer, get the tape measure out and measure the height, centre of wheel to guard on all 4 corners, then you will know for sure what height it is. Then we can help you.

Cheers

Gary

Guest qtvinsta

Straight after the 'camber' arm was fitted, I remember saying to myself that it looked as though toe would change if the camber was adjusted. I'm hoping that I won't need to install more like toe rod and traction rod and remove hicas...

Ultimately, I only wanted to have the vehicle sitting slightly lower to the ground. It's my daily ride so I definitely would appreciate longer tyre life, hence why I thought 0 degree rear camber and only slightly negative front camber

I will measure height and post tomorrow.

Cheers,

3. Changing only the rear upper control arms is a not a good solution technically speaking, you should adjust the traction arms in tandem with the upper control arms, otherwise you end up with undesireable bump steer (not that any bump steer is ever desireable in a performance car). Maybe that's what the alignment guy was trying to tell you?

Ok this interests me as i have aftermarket rear upper arms but no aftermarket traction rods. Can you suggest any good reading so i can understand bump steer a little better and how adjustable traction rods will affect it?

I'm not too sure the guy who does my wheel alignments will know what i'm on about... last time i got him to do a wheel alignment on my 32 he did it to the specs for a 300zx :D Not much choice of where to go where i live though :rofl:

Ok this interests me as i have aftermarket rear upper arms but no aftermarket traction rods. Can you suggest any good reading so i can understand bump steer a little better and how adjustable traction rods will affect it?

I'm not too sure the guy who does my wheel alignments will know what i'm on about... last time i got him to do a wheel alignment on my 32 he did it to the specs for a 300zx :thumbsup: Not much choice of where to go where i live though :thumbsup:

Rear bump steer is simple to measure. Take the spring and shock unit out of one side, disconnect that side swaybar link, stick the car on the wheel aligner, supporting the chassis at normal ride height of course and then measure the toe change (with the wheel aligner) as you jack that wheel up and down. Ideally there shouldn't be any change in the toe.

If you have adjustable traction rods then you simply adjust them to minimise the toe change.

I guess you already know that even by replacing the upper control arms (and traction rods) you have still left the soft, standard, old, worn out, rubber bushes in the uprights (hubs). So you are going to get some movement in toe as a result of that.

Cheers

Gary

Ahh thanks for that SK, that makes it a lot easier to understand! :thumbsup:

The bushes you mention in the hubs, is there an aftermarket option available? Also are they a diy job or something that has to be pressed in/out? Might give me something to do one weekend!

Cheers

Simon

Ahh thanks for that SK, that makes it a lot easier to understand! :D

The bushes you mention in the hubs, is there an aftermarket option available? Also are they a diy job or something that has to be pressed in/out? Might give me something to do one weekend!

Cheers

Simon

You guessed it, it's a pain in the ass job, you have to remove the uprights (hubs) and stick them in a press to remove the old bushes. I use the Whiteline rear camber kit ($125 on the Group Buy) and the 2 piece bushes just push in with your fingers, then it's just a tap with the hammer to fit the crush tubes.

Cheers

Gary

SYDNEY KID CAN YOU CONTACT ME !!! YOU`VE SENT ME THE WRONG SUSPENSION KIT. I HAVE R34 NOT R33. STOP IGONRING ME PLEASE.

Nobody is ignoring you. We get 40 to 50 PM's and emails a day, sometimes I have to actually do some work so I don't get to answer every PM and email every day. But I can assure you every single PM and every single email gets answered in the order in which we receive them. Sticking posts in innapropriate threads won't help you jump the que.

Cheers

Gary

what are the rubber bushes in the hubs

?

Rear bump steer is simple to measure. Take the spring and shock unit out of one side, disconnect that side swaybar link, stick the car on the wheel aligner, supporting the chassis at normal ride height of course and then measure the toe change (with the wheel aligner) as you jack that wheel up and down. Ideally there shouldn't be any change in the toe.

If you have adjustable traction rods then you simply adjust them to minimise the toe change.

I guess you already know that even by replacing the upper control arms (and traction rods) you have still left the soft, standard, old, worn out, rubber bushes in the uprights (hubs). So you are going to get some movement in toe as a result of that.

Cheers

Gary

what are the rubber bushes in the hubs?

Where the upper control arm and the traction rod are bolted to the upright (hub) there are rubber bushes, generally called the outer pivot point. They are pressed into the upright (hub). So you need to remove the uprights (hubs) from the car to press them out. They are the same physical size as the inner pivot points which are located in the arms.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...