Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 665
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

this happeneing this saturday then? we got a time place e.t.c for it , im working all weekend but! maybe ill get charmaine to get mine and make a special delivery! she doesnt know about it yet, but ill soonly let her know! hehehe, or is this bbq thing a whole joke and i should have read a few pages back! ??? devo but, sau has a good bunch of fellas and chicks on ere that i would like to get to know better!

Haha, i love when this:

hahahah sau bbq on sat to collect!!

turns into this:

this happeneing this saturday then? we got a time place e.t.c for it , im working all weekend but! maybe ill get charmaine to get mine and make a special delivery! she doesnt know about it yet, but ill soonly let her know! hehehe, or is this bbq thing a whole joke and i should have read a few pages back! ??? devo but, sau has a good bunch of fellas and chicks on ere that i would like to get to know better!

In just a handful of posts! ahh SAU :O

Now forgive me if this sounds a little harsh

it turns into your above quotes because you 2 have run this group buy like a couple of asshats making jokes there coming there not that no one really knows what to believe there's so many pages of random bs in this thread :O

your right, it is harsh. We sold 87 hoodies, and your the only one who has been harsh Steve. They are being printed at the moment, and the delay has definately been on their side, as they had to wait 4-5 days for a few sizes and colours to come into the country.

Like i have said before, i do apologise for the delay, and as Adrian said before, next week.

thanks damo... hoodies will be finished printing this week...

they will be dispatched late this week/early next for arrival mid next week....

i have emailed them on every second day to find a out progress and thats all we can do atm...

we get them when we get them and thats it! as as soon as they arrive i will be more than happy to make a meet on tues or wed night if thats when they come! just to get them out earlier!!!!

thanks for ur patience guys!

Fact: not once did i mention the delay caused by changeing manufactuer

Fact: 87 hoodies sold doesnt mean you done a good job just means there's a market

you look at all the other group buy threads and you wont see the school yard carry on that is in the last 15 pages

look you've done a great job i foot deny that i just think there didn't need fuel added to the fire and just because im the only one to speak up doesn't mean there isn't others

so its settled. no more posting in here guys, the very next post should be the post that says hoodies are here, pick them up at this time.

Well I consider this a good announcement:

thanks damo... hoodies will be finished printing this week...

they will be dispatched late this week/early next for arrival mid next week....

we get them when we get them and thats it! as as soon as they arrive i will be more than happy to make a meet on tues or wed night if thats when they come! just to get them out earlier!!!!

How about merging it in with the karting night next Friday? Hand out the hoodies and go racing in them ... what better way to christen them! :banana:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...