Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As the title of this topic suggests, i want to know how to drag a car, to its maximum potential.

I've heard lots, about when to shift, 'flat-changing' etc. I just want to know what is the best way to take off, and follow through to get the most out of any car. (Manual ofcourse!)

THe problem is that i cop a lot of wheel spin. I'm young and inexperienced. So anyone with experience can help.....

Thankz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22963-how-to-drag-to-max-potential/
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Ali

i dont get it?

Its all just practice. You've gotta "feel" when it starts to spin and balance the revs with the clutch. I usually change 6200-6500. I wouldnt recommend flat changing for the sake of the gearbox's life.

keep the posts on topic and dont just post for the hell of it.... *cough* slywpn*/cough* :P

as mentioned it all depends on what u can do... when u decide to change... how u use ur clutch.... what revs u dump it from first.

in my car power peaks at around 6100 to 6200 so changing any later than that is really a waste of time as the power tapers off by 7000rpm... i hit max boost at 4100 so its a good idea not to stall the revs anywhere near that high or the wheels will just spin on the spot.

ive found in my car the ideal launch is at about 3500rpm... i normally dont floor it flat just hold it til i feel the car grip... once it grips i floor it and change it into second as hard as i can... rev out to about 7000 and change into third... by the time the revs hit about 7000 again im pretty much near the end of the qtr and just let it ring out to about 8500

Guest PatPat34

Hey dude, this is a bit of experience i gain.

first, you have to know at what RPM, your car is achiving the max torque.......like for R34 GTT, about 3500 RPM, it reached its max torque. but different with what u have done for mod...........better u check through Dyno.

i don't really like the hand brake take off style, cause normally the drag place woule be flag enough, then keep the RPM at the range of max torque, then almost your clutch release point. your will achieve max power if u do this

don't worry too much about your clutch, of course it will damage, but as long as it is not over the limit, lets say better not over 4500 RPM, your clutch woun't burn out imme

Depends on the whether, type of road etc etc, but what I found to be good was find out at what rev your wheels don't free-spin. Rev it up to that and maintain it. When the 3 white lights come on (i'm assuming here that you'r not a fullsik mario that wants to race at the traffic lights) give it one little touch of throttle, then drop the clutch and pump the throttle, then hold every gear to the end of your boost RPM range then change gears (double clutch preffered but whatever you can do will also be OK) should work well and shouldn't see you destroying anything in the car.

Just remember, you not only get one guy jealous if you win a drag but you give yourself and your car a headache if you break somthing doing it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...