Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Dude dont *** around with boost cut defenders and stuff when the stock r32 ecu is so easy to modify. Its just a matter of raising the afm cut up a few degrees.

Surely theres someone in the area that can do it or maybe i can send you an ecu thats already had it taken off.

You should hit 300 at the rear.

yeah i think im going to just get my ecu remapped all together and ditch the SAFC that way i get a/f ratios and ignition timing all done as well as speed/boost cuts. then i dont have to do anything else! and hopefully get that 300rwhp im aiming for!

You are making 207rwkw. Thats past the limit of the standard RB20DET AFM.

A Remaped ecu isn't going to do anything as the AFM is still going to send a 5v signal to the ecu. Slapping a Z32 AFM will send a lower voltage at a higher air flow rate.

Hence why you notice the boost cut more so in the higher gears as the turbo in higher gears pushes more air than in lower gears.

This is also generally why with turbo cars you will get a higher dyno reading in say 4th gear compared to third.

... i appreciate what all the fuss is with Z32 AFMs, but i dont think they are a physical wall when chasing power.

Ok RB20 AFMs run out of resolution but can be tuned around to still make good power (Am i right????)

This saves time (=money) when getting the car dyno'd/chip rewritten, as the whole rev range wont require changing as a result of the different AFM output.

My car made 160rwkw in third then 164 in fourth.

Apparently its due to the turbo having more time to spin up and get more air flowing.

Similiar to why with a big turbo on a smallish motor the turbo hasn't got time to feed air in to the motor in first gear.

But yer.. The torque is higher in lower gears just for some reason the peak power reading is slightly lower.

This is also why 3rd gear is known in turbo cars as the overtaking gear.

I've got the two runs that I can scan for you to compare if you like.

Its what the dyno said and when I asked Tim he said yer thats pretty normal for Turbo cars due to blah blah what I said above.

Joel, that's bizarre, I mean torque x rpm is power, so if you have more torque at any given rpm power must increase. Perhaps your dyno operator has been messing with correction figures or increasing load to spool the turbo up harder/quicer?

Sorry, I am not trying to naysay what you have got on paper, just trying to understand how it happened?

Joel: with the Z32 airflow meter is it possible to just slap it on without tuning the ecu? i keep getting mixed responses to this, i have a wiring diagram that shows me how to run a Z32 meter into my old afm wiring. and the instructions dont say anything about tuning computer - i dont know if it assumes someone doing this conversion will have aftermarket management or tuned ecu.

When or if i get my ecu tuned, would it be worth while fitting a Z32 afm? or is it a waste?

Maybe its the charastic of my EBC when in Auto mode.

My EBC if set to say 16psi will hit 15psi then slowly creep up to 16psi. Where as in manual mode it will hit 16psi then slowly drop as the rpm rises (i.e turbo running out of puff apparently)

When In auto mode the EBC in second gear will make a peak of maybe 15psi where as in third it will peak at 16psi.

Maybe the EBC influenced the factors?!?

bbenny..

For example...

Stock AFM: 10cfm passing the afm so it sends 1v to the ecu.

Z32 AFM: 10cfm passing the afm so it sends .5v to the ecu.

This to me would make the car do everything leaner as with z32 afm it thinks less air is entering the motor there for it puts less fuel in.

It would most probably affect your idling and mid range more likely. Would be interesting to see exactly how it would run.

Personally I would slap it in start the car and see what happens. If all seemed ok I would take it for a light spin with out hitting boost as i'm familiar with the or my cars feeling when it is running lean. Then off to a dyno to double check.

I was reading a zoom mag a couple of days ago and on the second page its got advertisements to the Dyno Dynamics Dyno.

If you photocopy or bring the token that is attached you get a free bottle of Nulon Pro Strength I think it is and a free dyno AF check. :)

so is it worth while doing a swap when i get my ecu tuned? it just seems a little dodgey running out of the std airflow resolution...

I wouldnt have a clue how to tune an ecu so i dont know if thats right, but does that mean the ecu will get an accurate signal if it is maxing out?

Air flow resolution will only be an issue if you say tune the car for 1.2 bar, get the mixtures right (using the dyno AF sensor), then when you get the car on the street turn the boost down. Reason is the AFM doesnt know the difference in flow of anything above its max of 5.115V. Bottom line is you will run rich as hell on lower boost. If you decide you dont car and want to run the boost the car is tuned at - it will make no difference.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...