Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought I should put a post up because searching has not been working since last night (so my apologies if this was already answered elsewhere ages ago)

For the past few weeks I've been slowly been upgrading the factory turbos on my GTR with the HKS 2530's I bought ages ago but never had time to fit. I'm only spending an hour or 2 each day on it (missing some days for various reasons) and I'm right up to the end and I've hit the biggest snag I've hit in the whole project.

This is the situation as simply as I can put it - The aftermarket dump pipe from the front turbo touches the compressor housing of the rear turbo, which then touches on the aftermarket HKS metal intake of the rear turbo. Aside from this being a far from ideal situation for heat, the main problem is it stops the intake pipe flange from sitting in position on the turbo (ie, I can't bolt it in). I will post pics when the forum starts working again, it currently won't let me.

The problem is due to the aftermarket dump pipes being wider than the factory ones due to the split wastegate outlet, but I think it is also compounded by aftermarket the front pipe (unknown brand, came with car) being slightly pushed up and out of position after many years of hitting the occasional speed bump. There is no flex pipe in the front pipe so it's going to affect the fitting of the turbos and dumps directly.

Here are the things I've already thought of to fix it, along with my misgivings about each option.

1. Rotate the rear compressor housing slightly to allow fit - I'm not entirely sure that this will allow it to fit, but I may give it a shot anyway (it's hard to get to the bolts without removing the turbo though)

2. Replace the front turbo's dump pipe with the factory one, which will clear it - Ugh, for several reasons.

3. Take front turbo back out again and hammer a flat spot onto the bit that touches the rear turbo parts (already tried this in car, not working) - Not as much "ugh" as above, but still ugh.

4. Try to bend the front pipe inlets back into a more normal position to provide the extra 5mm or so space I need. I think there is enough free play n the manifold and turbo mountings to accommodate this - This is my prefered option, but it is very difficult to bend tough tubular stainless steel without using the road (speed bumps).

5. Replace front pipe with a new one and/or one with a flex fitting - kind of ugh because the front pipe is in good condition aside from being bent slightly out of shape. I imagine any second hand front pipe will have the same issues if it's ever scraped the concrete. I can't justify this expense without first trying to bend the old one back into alignment.

6. Tow the car to a mechanic and pay them to sort it out (ugh, and maybe even impossible given the location of my garage)

7. Grind some off the flange of the rear intake pipe, which will allow it to sit further back onto the turbo and clear the dump pipe - It's only aluminium so will probably weaken it more than it should be, and also I'd need this done professionally to get it 100% flat.

8. Replace rear intake pipe with one that fits - It'd have to be metal or it'd melt onto the dump pipe, and any metal ones would probably have the same issue I have now.

I'm sure there are other things I've thought of but can't remember them right now. Any other ideas?

What dump pipes are you using?

Assuming they are a decent brand everything should bolt up with no messing around at all.

I wouldn't be looking at modifying, grinding or bending anything, but rather find the cause of the fitting issue and fix it.

If your front pipes are bent and out of place, replace them.

If they are HKS dumps then you have them the wrong way arround, they are actualy slightly different front and rear

They aren't HKS dumps, just ebay cheapies. I will take another look when I get home tonight, but I think they won't go the other way around because of the different angle and height of the dump-to-front pipe flange. If they are the wrong way around though, the previous owner has shoehorned the factory dumps in the wrong way around too because I made note of each dump pipe as I took it out and matched them to the new ones.

Righto, check just in case anyway... With my hks ones the rear one was a bit longer then the front one and the front one had a little bend in it to clear the comp cover of the rear turbo. Ill see if I can find some pix later tonight if you want

Ok I had a look at some photos I took during each step when I was removing stuff (still can't attach files here) and even when it was the factory dumps and turbos, the exhaust flange almost touched on the rear turbo compressor housing. So I've definitely got the dumps pipes on the right ends, short on front and long on rear. It' s just a combination of the slightly bigger compressor housings and the dump pipes which take up more space than the factory ones even with the heat shields on.

I have gained some extra space by loosening everything and shifting it around a little and tightening back up. It would fit except for the heat wrap which makes it too thick, but without it then I will have hot stainless steel touching on the aluminium intake, which is not good. So I might have to hammer a small dent into the dump, but not as much as I first thought. I also found I have to either drop the front turbo down again or rotate the rear compressor temporarily to fit the bolt for the intake in.

I'm gonna have dinner now and and watch some Benny Hill.

Jim, we've had nothing but trouble with the fit of ebay dumps. one set we bought was literally so bad the rear dump fouled on the flywheel (yes the flywheel not just the bellhousing or firewall).

just whack a dent for clearance you will be fine. and think youself lucky they were so close to fitting :domokun:

I can finally upload pics so here is the before and after shots. As you can see, even the factory dump pipe flange is touching on the rear turbo compressor. Don't mind the heat wrap, it's been re-used from my old Skyline and that's why it's shredding all over the place. It's only a temporary measure for now.

I've been carefully bending the front pipes back into shape with a scissor jack levering a breaker bar off the chassis. If I can't get it happening in the next hour or so I'm gonna quit it and try the Duncan dent on the weekend :domokun:

post-502-1218723946_thumb.jpg

post-502-1218724081_thumb.jpg

post-502-1218724103_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...