Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the get new posts thing is acting oddly. it comes up fine but when i try to access page two of the search i get this:

searcherrorqa0.jpg

i havent tried any other searches to see if its common to all of them. im running xp and ff3

EDIT: same thing with the "get active topics for: today" function

Heres a quick and dirty rundown;

The site has been moved to a new server and the old server has had its config updated to point to the new servers db. This means we have one db and two 'sites' until everybodies DNS is updated. Because I have fixed the search on the new server, people who are still getting the old server's 'site' will have some problems, but they will be fixed when the users' DNS is updated. (ie, I can search and view new posts with no errors at all).

Hopefully that makes sense, its hard to explain DNS stuff without pictures. Ask any q's, I might have to reply using an ms paint representation. :(:P:(

Christian

The error returned was:

Erreur Sphinx : connection to localhost:3312 failed

Merci de contacter un Administrateur !

Is this the DNS related issue still? Ive cleared the caches on my DNS servers and still cant get access.

Do this for me;

Open command prompt: Start -> Run -> Type 'cmd' -> Hit Enter

Type;

nslookup <enter>

set q=any <enter>

skylinesaustralia.com <enter>

skylinesaustralia.net <enter>

And then post the output here. (You may need to enable cut n paste, right click on the title bar of cmd, go to properties and tick 'quick edit').

> set q=any

> skylinesaustralia.com

Server: UnKnown

Address: 172.16.1.1

DNS request timed out.

timeout was 2 seconds.

*** Request to UnKnown timed-out

> skylinesaustralia.net

Server: UnKnown

Address: 172.16.1.1

skylinesaustralia.net nameserver = ns1.nexcess.net

skylinesaustralia.net nameserver = ns2.nexcess.net

skylinesaustralia.net MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail.skylinesaustra

lia.net

skylinesaustralia.net

primary name server = ns1.nexcess.net

responsible mail addr = admin.skylinesaustralia.net

serial = 1219358344

refresh = 7200 (2 hours)

retry = 2048 (34 mins 8 secs)

expire = 1048576 (12 days 3 hours 16 mins 16 secs)

default TTL = 21600 (6 hours)

skylinesaustralia.net internet address = 208.69.126.31

mail.skylinesaustralia.net internet address = 208.69.126.31

>

> set type=ns

> skylinesaustralia.com

Server: UnKnown

Address: 172.16.1.1

Non-authoritative answer:

skylinesaustralia.com nameserver = ns1.nexcess.net

skylinesaustralia.com nameserver = ns2.nexcess.net

ns1.nexcess.net internet address = 69.39.81.205

ns2.nexcess.net internet address = 208.69.120.2

> skylinesaustralia.net

Server: UnKnown

Address: 172.16.1.1

Non-authoritative answer:

skylinesaustralia.net nameserver = ns1.nexcess.net

skylinesaustralia.net nameserver = ns2.nexcess.net

ns1.nexcess.net internet address = 69.39.81.205

ns2.nexcess.net internet address = 208.69.120.2

>

And this too. Looks like your authorative DNS servers arent accepting connections so everyone is running from cached records in DNS even though the TTL has probably expired.

> set type=a

> server ns1.nexcess.net

DNS request timed out.

timeout was 2 seconds.

Default Server: ns1.nexcess.net

Address: 69.39.81.205

> www.skylinesaustralia.com

Server: ns1.nexcess.net

Address: 69.39.81.205

DNS request timed out.

timeout was 2 seconds.

DNS request timed out.

timeout was 2 seconds.

*** Request to ns1.nexcess.net timed-out

> www.skylinesaustralia.net

Server: ns1.nexcess.net

Address: 69.39.81.205

DNS request timed out.

timeout was 2 seconds.

DNS request timed out.

timeout was 2 seconds.

*** Request to ns1.nexcess.net timed-out

>

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...