Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not recommending this, but just showing it for interests sake:

http://www.draganddrift.co.uk/photos/rick_...ug16_051745.jpg

Holy macaroni, Ive never heard of this turbo! is it new?

i gotta find some cars using this on youtube

Holy macaroni, Ive never heard of this turbo! is it new?

i gotta find some cars using this on youtube

Yeah mentioned them earlier in the thread when "GT45xx" based turbos came up.. they are pretty new and will probably be a pretty limited run. There is a drag GTR in the UK which is having one installed and should be doing some runs with it in the near future, same car did an 8.2 with a T51R Kai so should be very interesting to see what it does with something this substantial.

The real different is that HKS T51R KAi and SPL turbos use Garretts old T51 series Turbine in 76 trim , the Garrett marketed GT4294R and GT4202R use Garretts GT42 UHP turbine in 84 trim which is a more modern design .

Don't forget that most of the HKS spec Garrett turbo line has been around for a while now and sometimes use older T series compressors and turbines . Aside from T51's you have T04Z's with T series compressor and turbine so they aren't always cutting edge technology by todays standards . This doesn't means they're old dungers because often their custom housings make the best use of older tech wheels .

As was mentioned one of the GT42R's is going to be cheaper and at least stay with a variation of the T4/T45 footprint , the point is if you trash it and need to replace it the zeros will be less and the parts easier to get .

IMO you're looking at big turbos for an RB2530 so I hope you have deep pockets for the engine driveline etc .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
Holy macaroni, Ive never heard of this turbo! is it new?

i gotta find some cars using this on youtube

I don't think you will find the T62R BB as they still haven't been released yet. We have one on order for a customer in Aust. and should have here shortly for him. They are made in limited number and are pre order only (if anyone else wants one better PM me fast).

The Garrett equivalent weighs 10kg more than the T51 on our scales so that makes a big difference for starters. Attached is a pic of the exhaust housing available in 1.00 or 1.20 A/R which is a lot different to the Garrett.

Cheers

Marty

post-45152-1219619906_thumb.jpg

Edited by Martin HKS
Hey guys, your right i couldnt find any videos on youtube with cars running this new turbo but that didnt stop me from typing in 't51r' and watching some amazing supras, gtrs and even silvias running it. The sound is unmistakable.

You'll find if you search for GT42R/GT42RS/GT4202R cars will sound suspiciously similar :rofl:

The real different is that HKS T51R KAi and SPL turbos use Garretts old T51 series Turbine in 76 trim , the Garrett marketed GT4294R and GT4202R use Garretts GT42 UHP turbine in 84 trim which is a more modern design .

Don't forget that most of the HKS spec Garrett turbo line has been around for a while now and sometimes use older T series compressors and turbines . Aside from T51's you have T04Z's with T series compressor and turbine so they aren't always cutting edge technology by todays standards . This doesn't means they're old dungers because often their custom housings make the best use of older tech wheels .

As was mentioned one of the GT42R's is going to be cheaper and at least stay with a variation of the T4/T45 footprint , the point is if you trash it and need to replace it the zeros will be less and the parts easier to get .

IMO you're looking at big turbos for an RB2530 so I hope you have deep pockets for the engine driveline etc .

Cheers A .

I think the driveline should hold up ok. Ive got a C4 built byProtrans, 2 way diff and GTR drive shafts.

Yupe , as someone already mentioned it before

HKS T51R KAI = Garrett GT4294R

HKS T51R SPL = Garrett GT4202R

HKS T04Z = Garrett T67

of course Garrett units arent as bling as the HKS units :rofl:

As stated above, the SPL is actually a GT4502 not a GT4202.

And HKS T04Z = Garrett T04Z

Nope , T51R's use a T51 turbine which is why for some reason they're called "T51R" .

GT42's (4294 and 4202) use GT42 turbines .

There is also a GT4094R which not surprisingly uses a GT40 turbine .

A .

Sorry, I must have missed the point to your comment. Are you referring to what I said or what someone else has said?

No one above , Garrett virtually always call their turbos by the units turbine series number ie GT30 GT35 GT40 GT42 T4 etc etc .

The thing you will notice with large frame Garrett ball bearing "T" series turbos ie T04Z and T51R is the method of fixing the turbine housing to the side of the bearing housing (center section) . T series turbos use clamp plates and bolts where Garretts large frame bush or ball bearing GT series units have four "ears" on the back of the center section through which bolts screw into a series of threaded holes in the side of the turbine housing .

Its just a way of making a more modern cartridge fit the old T series turbine housings which make a matching set with the old T series turbines ie T04 P trim and T51 turbines .

Pay no attention to the American term "T67" compressor wheel , it's a flawed method of attempting to identify a compressor wheel by it's inducer diameter which in the case of the T04R compressor (used in T04Z turbo) is ~ 66.7mm . Precision over there sometimes calls their version of the T04Z PT67 meaning T04 P trim turbine + "T67" compressor .

I've no doubt HKSs housings are lighter and more compact than Garretts , the volute and nozzle sections of their housings are very different and more like the TiAL stainless steel ones .

A HKS spec T51R is not exactly a compact turbocharger , I suggest people search around for pics of GTRs with them fitted .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

Turbonetics GTK Series (650, 800, 1000)

SEMA product of the year, less than half the price, can't go wrong.

And in case you're wondering what GTK stands for; according to them it's "Garrett Turbo Killer" :rofl:

And in case you're wondering what GTK stands for; according to them it's "Garrett Turbo Killer" :action-smiley-069:

Shame they are way more laggy and expensive than the Garrett GT series, at least they are pretty and strong :blink:

Shame they are way more laggy and expensive than the Garrett GT series, at least they are pretty and strong :action-smiley-069:

I think lag is comparable to the Garrett series (don't have actual proof so won't make any claims), but expensive? A GTK 650 turbo will cost you AUD $1800.00 delivered if you go through the right avenues.

And yes I concur they are pretty (not sure about the strong bit, no proof either)

Ive only heard bad reports about turbonetics turbos, can any confirm on reliability if any one in aus is using them?

I am in NZ, a mate of mine was running a Turbonetics T66 on his GTS4 for quite some time and it did hold on fine until he blew his motor and the oil got contaminated and stuffed the turbo. It was quite impressively laggy given it was on a 3litre, though granted it was a plain bearing/non GTK version. I'm surprised to hear they are potentially competitively price in Oz as here they are really expensive, probably part of the reason they are never used.

Its interesting that in their country of origin hardly anyone seems to use them either if you look through specs of all their time attack and top drag cars.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...