Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

not being technical at all here.

but i just took my friends 300zxtt for a spin, he just fitted a lightweight underdrive pulley kit.. the main pulley is 800g compared to the original 8kg.. and it DEFINETLY accelerated heaps harder.. reved faster. made the whole car feel lighter, as if the engine had less of a job to do.

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmmm funny. I gave GFB a call about their crank pulleys and belt sizes the other day concerning my SR20. Anyways, after that I asked them why they dont make pulleys for the RB. They plainly stated that it ruins the bearings and that they 'learned the hard way'.

Food for thought...

Give them a call i guess. I remember a few days ago i was reading about a H22A honda using a pulley, and after 40,000ks, a teardown was performed. It was found that the main bearing #1 was completely hammered compared to main bearing #5. I'll try and dig it up.

Also alot of WRXs seem to have trouble with pulleys, as it causes the CAS to go whacked at 6000rpm. Sounds like nasty vibrations are responsible, and this is on a short crank EJ20.. Tonnes more info on NASIOC.

This is the email Reply I got from Brett turner at Go Fast Bits:

Hi Ryan,

We don't do a pulley for the RB series engine, because they rely on the harmonic balancer. Without it, the oil pump will fail and therefore the engine will shortly after if it is not stopped in time, which is unfortunate because there would be a significant gain to be had by removing the extremely heavy factory pulley.

Regards,

Brett Turner

Engineer/Technical Sales

Go Fast Bits

+612 9569 7648

www.gofastbits.com.au

Perhaps if they were to satisfy us with underdriven/lightened pulleys and forgo the balancer we would be happy?

Thanks for the great discussion guys. Heaps more interesting than the weapons engineering I'm stuck with now.

Hi guys, we have been running lightweight pulleys on race engines for years (not RB's, yet) without any signs of these bearing issues. Since they have all been very tightly balanced, maybe this is why we have no problems.

This of course doesn't not fix any harmonic problems, but I can't see how that would be an issue with RB20/25/26 's. But RB30's, because of their longer stroke, may be an issue.

I am about to test a set of lightweight pulley's on an RB31DET on the engine dyno in the next few weeks, so that will be interesting to see if there are any vibrations. They show up readily on the engine dyno as it has sensors mounted in the bed.

Interesting thread...........

hmm... torsional vibration and whatever else aside.. if people are really keen on reducing the rotational mass.. wouldn't a more simple solution to cut a few items out of the equation?

Wouldn't simply just removing the belt to the aircon compressor (and you may as well remove the compressor at the same time to save that 10kg or so), removing the engine fan, replacing that with a thermo fan, and putting in an electric water pump (craig davies, etc) give you similar results in terms of reduced rotational mass? Ok, maybe its not as simple, but same end results(??)

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2000/08...ump/index.shtml - is an interesting article..

p.s. has anybody run a craig davies pump in their RB? What were the results like? Its about $600 for the kit.

predator, I dont think ppl wanna forgo AC. And besides, you loose almost no power to the compressor anyway when its not operating! And the fan is viscous coupling, so you'd only loose coupla hp you wouldnt feel at best (unless its fully locked due to being fooked or ur engine is running hot)

Also ~80% of the gain from a pulley is actually removing the weight from it, and the rest is from underdriving the accessories!

I'd agree that off the aircon off is barely making a difference.. my physics isn't great but wouldn't *any* friction on the pulley caused by the belt would cause some loss? Even if is not actively spinning?? But anyhow, the aircon wasn't the main factor, as like above, you'd get the same effect just by turning it off (simple)

However the fan would have to place some noticeable placing draw?? and like wise the waterpump must be placing draw?? as again (physics knowledge not great) isn't any device running off that pulley system effectively creating an increase in rotational mass?? it works as "one" system, rather than simply a weight of an individual component??

as you can see with the question marks I have absolutely no idea, but I'm just keen to find out why/why not :-)

Hi predator, I have already completely removed the A/C and the viscous fan has been replaced with an electric one. Based on other results I have seen, an electric water pump is not on my list. I have also replaced the standard flywheel and clutch with an OS Giken twin plate. So pulleys are next on the list of rotating things to lighten.

You are right Predator, the water pump does draw power from the engine... but if we could get our hand on a light weight crankshaft pulley, it would be easier, and less expensive.

Out of interest, Issue 40 of "High Performance Imports" (GTR Special No. 4) - has an add on page 11 for a super light weight crankshaft pulley for the RB26DETT, by Power Enterprise. I wonder if they make one for the RB25DET?

Trust/Greddy makes a set of pulleys, all *bar* the the main crank (I assume for the risk/perceived risk of the balancing issues discussed).. Favourites nengun have them for approximately $300: http://www.nengun.com/product_info.php?cPa...4694af6628dcbea

Pulley.jpg

I guess the main one everybody has been talking about is the main crank pulley, however I feeling trust would have invested a bit to see whether it was safe enough to reliably put on a stock balanced RB engine and the answer was no. For fitment, I assume they are same across RB25 and RB26, seeing as everything around this "area" is pretty much transferable (water pump, timing belt, ex. and inlet cam gears, even the cam cover)

Hi Sydneykid,

Curious to hear about the results of your rotating mass reduction experiments. Have you produced any sort of measurable results thus far? I guess in racing it all matters, but I was just wondering if you have been able to deduce how much power was being sapped by the heavy pulleys experimentally? Also, I dont understand how the state of engine balance, i.e. dynamic balance of the crank, and static balance of rods/pistons etc, has anything to do with the harmonic balancer. I was under the impression that its task was to reduce torsional oscillations, not moments produced by dynamic imbalances which lead to crank bending perpendicular to its axis. Do you think you'll get an accurate representation of torsional effect without the use of an encoder device on the crank snout? Interesting...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...