Jump to content
SAU Community

Ecu Error: Knock Sensor Signal?

Rekin

By Rekin,
in General Maintenance

 Share

Recommended Posts

Rekin Grand Master

Rekin

Posted
Posted

Hey,

My car has been playing up recently, where if i leave the car to idle for a while after driving. The revs drop and it starts to splutter, with the idle moving up and down and car acting all funny.

Once i start moving and accelerating everything is fine.

Connected a ecu diagnosis tool and an error came up;

34: Knock sensor signal

I have a stock ecu, Where is the knock sensor located? How much it cost to replace? Is there a part number?

Thanks all :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/234972-ecu-error-knock-sensor-signal/
Share on other sites
Rekin Grand Master

Rekin

Posted
  • Author
Posted
knock sensors are located under cylinder 3 and 5, to get the rear one off the starter motor has to come off.

and pm femno bout the knock sensors he gets them for a good price

Thanks for the quick reply :3some:

Would faulty knock sensors cause the car to splutter and erratic idle on idle?

I read somewhere that the knock sensors switch the map to safemode to protect engine.

If its switching between maps, this could be causing the spluttering?

battery Mentor

battery

Posted
Posted

yeh i had the same problem.

couldn't be bothered fixing the sensor so did a resistor mod, basically you put a 1M ohm resistor between the knock sensor wire and ground, it fools the ecu into thinking the sensor is fine.

i can give you more details if you want, ecu pinouts etc.....

Rekin Grand Master

Rekin

Posted
  • Author
Posted

From GTR.co.uk;

right at the top of the block under where the head meets the block, 8" apart.

very difficult to get to and remove with engine in place..look under the plenum at the block as above. they have a black plug on them..

pic33041ij2.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Duncan · Posted

      Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • funkymonkey
      Jacks that fit under GTR lips that can reach the subframe?

      By funkymonkey · Posted

      I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...